Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
k.k.kharbanda vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 6303/2004 K.K.KHARBANDA Date of decision:26. h March, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Meenu Mainee, Advocate. $~7 Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing the order of the respondents in terms of which the case of the petitioner has been placed in a sealed cover and further giving directions to the respondents to open the sealed cover and release promotion of the petitioner, if selected from the date from which his juniors had been promoted with all consequential benefits.2. The brief facts of this case are that the petitioner was appointed as an L.D.C. under the respondents on 14.12.1967 and thereafter, he got regular promotions and finally he was promoted as a Section Officer on 12.12.1979. The petitioner was eligible for the next post of As...
Surya Food and Agro Limited vs.om Traders & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h March, 2019 CS(COMM) 10/2019 & IA No.259/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) SURYA FOOD AND AGRO LIMITED .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. N. Mahabir and Mr. P.C. Arya, Advs. OM TRADERS & ANR. Versus ...Defendants Through: Mr. Hemant Sharma, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit against the two defendants namely (i) Om Traders; and, (ii) Raja Udyog Private Limited (RUPL), for permanent injunction restraining selling, offering for sale any goods, advertising or promoting any product under the packaging, get up, trade dress of the defendants product BUTTER KRUNCH or any packaging, get up, trade dress which is similar to that of plaintiffs product BUTTER DELITE and likely to cause passing off and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 10th January, 2019, when though not finding any case of passing off to have been made out but observing that the...
Constable Uma Shankaran vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 15th March, 2019 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 W.P.(C) 4680/2006 Through: Mr M.G. Kapoor, Advocate. + CONSTABLE UMA SHANKARAN ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Dr Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for versus UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner who was working as Constable in the Border Security Force (BSF) in the 62nd Battalion, has challenged the proceedings, the findings and the sentence of the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) on 5th January, 2005, dismissing him from service. He has also challenged the order dated 22nd November, 2005 passed by the Director General (DG), BSF (Respondent No.2), rejecting his appeal against the above order.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner was enrolled in the BSF on 30th July, 1983. The charge against him was that whilst he was deployed at the Border Outpost (BOP), Ramnagar, Chandn...
Anil Kumar Singh @ Sunny vs.state Through Sho p.s. Nabi Karim, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 683/2019 ANIL KUMAR SINGH @SUNNY ........ Petitioner versus STATE THROUGH SHO P.S. NABI KARIM, DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kotnala with Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocates. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Insp. Vijay Kumar Gupta with SI Ramavtar, PS Nabi Karim. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.31/2007 under Sections 386/380/392/4IPC, Police Station Nabi Karim.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was enlarged on bail on 30.03.2007 and continued on bail till his bail was cancelled by order dated 12.12.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail of the petitioner was cancelled solely on the ground that the matter pertained to the year 2007 and was BAIL APPLN.683/2019 ...
Swarn Bhanot vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 02.2019 Pronounced on:26. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 8597/2009 & CM APPLN. 5681/2009 SWARN BHANOT ........ Petitioner Through Dr.Aurobindo Ghose, Adv. with Mr.Prem Bhushan Dewan & Ms.Gurjeet Kaur, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. with Mr.Shyam Agarwal, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor & Mr.Parth Semwal, Advs. for UGC. Ms.Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. with Mr.Aakash Yadav, Adv. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 12712/2009 & CM APPLN. 13404/2009 & 21945/2010 R C BHATIA ........ Petitioner Through Dr.Aurobindo Ghose, Adv. with Mr.Prem Bhushan Dewan & Ms.Gurjeet Kaur, Advs. versus SHYAM LAL COLLEGE(EVENING) THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. with Mr.Shyam Agarwal, Adv. for R-1. W.P.(C) 8597/2009, 12712/2009 & 3679/2017 Page 1 of 30 + W.P.(C) 3679/2017 KANCHAN SAINI ........ Peti...
Simplex-Aanav Jv Through Manish Sachdeva vs.south Delhi Municipal Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h March,2019 REVIEW PET. 87/2019 IN W.P.(C) 12018/2018 & CM Appl. 9368/2019 SIMPLEX-AANAV JV THROUGH: MANISH SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D. Singh & Mr. Kartik Arora, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH: COMMISSIONER ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC for SDMC with Mr. Komal Soront & Mr. Rajeev Jha, Advs. for SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. Review of the judgment dated 20.11.2018 by which the writ petition was dismissed, is sought by this proceeding. The review petition has been filed pursuant to an order dated 18.02.2019 passed by the Supreme Court in SLP(C) No.487/2019. The petitioner had challenged the judgment under review by way of the said Special Leave Petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn with the following observations:-"REVIEW PET. 87/2019 in W.P.(C) 12018/2018 Page 1 of 14 the Le...
Ramesh Chander Mohanty & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1575/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6368/2019 RAMESH CHANDER MOHANTY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Kalra, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Megha Ram. Mr. Jaladhar Das, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.560/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Sangam Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 6th March, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Megha Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been ami...
Indian Railway Stations Development Corporation Ltd. Vs.pr. Commission ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h March, 2019. + W.P.(C) 6782/2018 INDIAN RAILWAY STATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava & Mr. Suvinay Kumar Dash, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Std. Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % 1. The writ petitioner seeks the intervention of this Court to set aside an order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax [CIT]. under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner is aggrieved by the assessment order made by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the assessment year (AY) 2013-2014, wherein the AO disallowed three items of expenditure claimed as deduction, i.e., depreciation, preliminary expenses, and employees remuneration.2. The assessee/petitioner company was incorporated under the old Companies Act on 12.04.2012 as a joint ven...
M/S p.m. Mines & Minerals Private Limited vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:26. 03.2019 + W.P. (C) 5121/2015 & CM Nos. 9274/2015 & 12629/2015 B. RUDRAGOUDA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS ...Petitioner ...Respondents :Mr S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate, Mr Dhruv : Mehta, Senior Advocate and Mr Sameer : Abhyankar. :Mr Joseph Aristotle S for R-3, Mr Sandeep : Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms Kirti : Mishra and Ms Apurva Upmanyu for R-4. AND + W.P.(C) 6456/2015 ...Petitioner M/S P.M. MINES & MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus ...Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. :Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr T.P. Singh, Advocate for R1. Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms Kirti Mishra, Ms Apurva Upmanyu, Advocates for R4/SAIL. Mr Joseph Aristotle S., Advocate with Ms Priya Aristotle, Mr Shikq P., Advocate for R2 and R3 State of...
Smt. Avtar Kaur vs.mrs. Zuleikha Karnik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~11 & 27 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 153/2018 SMT. AVTAR KAUR Through: Mr. Sukhbir Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiff % MRS. ZULEIKHA KARNIK versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Tajinder Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER2603.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.: I.A. 921/2019 (delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the application is condoned and the application is disposed of. I.A. 4150/2019 (delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the application is condoned and the application is disposed of. I.A. 920/2019 (Application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) read with Section 151 CPC) 3. The Plaintiff has approached this Court by invoking Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The prayers made in the suit read as under; (i) To pass a decree for Rs.2,65,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore & Sixty Five Lacs only), being the amount of bill of exchange, under Order XXXVII CPC, in favour of the plain...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »