Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hindalco Industries Limited vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3022/2019 and CM Nos. 13936-13937/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, versus Senior Advocate with Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate, MsMuleta Dutta and Sanyam Saxena, Advocates. HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr T.P. Singh, MrViplav Acharya, Advocates and MrSambhav Jain, Ministry of Coal for UOI. ORDER2603.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a demand letter dated 25.03.2019 issued by respondent nos.1 and 2 calling upon respondent no.4 (Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.) to transfer an amount of 64,29,31,200/- to the respondents by partly invoking the performance bank guarantee furnished by respondent no.4 at the instance of the petitioner. The said bank guarantee has been invoked by respondent no.2 as the c...
National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Bhagheeratha Engineering L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :26. h March, 2019 + + O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Amit George, Mr.V.M. Vishnu, Mr.Rishabh Dheer & Mr.Amol Acharya, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Siddharth Pandey & Ms.Isha Bansal, Advs. O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr.Siddharth ........ Petitioner Pandey versus Ms.Isha Bansal, Advs. & M/S BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Dr.Amit George, Mr.V.M. Vishnu, Mr.Rishabh Dheer & Mr.Amol Acharya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.2962/2019 (Exemption) in O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 IA No.3058/2019 (Exemption) in O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 & 88/2019 Page 1 O.M.P. (COMM) 85/2019 & O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2019 & IA No.3059/2019 (Stay) 1. These two petitions have been filed unde...
Rishi Pal vs.delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h March, 2019 RISHI PAL + W.P.(C) 4116/2018 versus Through: Mr.Fidel Sebastian, Advocate ........ Petitioner DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr.U.N. Tiwary, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court dated 1. 09th September, 2015 whereby his statement of claim was dismissed.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as a Conductor in 1983. On 31st May, 1993, the petitioner took voluntary retirement under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS). However, he subsequently withdrew from the VRS Scheme and was reinstated in service on 19th January, 1995 pursuant to an order dated 08th September, 1994 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 5440/1993.3. On 30th March, 1995, the respondent issued a charge sheet to the petitioner for unauthorized absence of 176 days between September, 1992 and May, 1993. According to the respondent, the...
Vijay Pal @ Sittu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 698/2019 VIJAY PAL @ SITTU ........ Petitioner STATE versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Siddharth Pandit with Ms. Aradhana Pandit, Advocates. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of 45 days in FIR No.189/2014 under Sections 302/3IPC read with Sections 25/25(54)/Arms Act, Police Station Mehrauli on the ground of surgery of the father of the petitioner.2. It is contended that the petitioner is the only son and there are only female members in the family, i.e., the wife and the mother of the petitioner, both of whom are suffering from several ailments. BAIL APPLN.698/2019 Page 1 of 3 3.4. Status report has been filed. The same is taken on record. The medical condition of the father of the petiti...
D S G vs.a K G
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:26. 02.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:26. 03.2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 312/2018, CM No.50248/2018 & CM No.2409/2019 D S G A K G ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Yudhishter Sharma and Mr. Nishant Sharma, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. By way of the present matrimonial appeal, the appellant seeks to challenge an order dated 16.11.2018 passed by the Learned Family Court, whereby the Learned Family Court has directed that the custody arrangement of the 11 years old daughter of the parties would continue as decided by the earlier order dated 28.07.2018 wherein the interim custody of the child is to remain with the father for four days MAT.APP. (F.C.) 312/2018 Page 1 of 12 and with the mother for three days.2. The relevant and necessary facts for the adjudication of the present appeal are ...
Anil Kumar vs.state ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: March 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1582/2019 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Shukla, Advocate. Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with ASI Ranvijay Singh and SI Yashdeep. Mr. Sunil Ahlawat and Mr. Rohms Davin Ahlawat, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 6329/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1582/2019 Quashing of FIR No.12/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Crime (women) Cell, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 24th January, 2018 (Annexure P-3 colly.) between petitioner and respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be ...
S G vs.s G
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:26. h March, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 217/2017 S G CORAM: S G ..... Appellant Through Mr. Aman Mehta, Advocate versus Through Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Advocate ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 06.12.2017 passed by the Family Court, more particularly, the order pertaining to release of Rs.1.09 Crores deposited in HSBC Bank in favour of the respondent/husband.2. In this case, the marriage between the parties was solemnized as far back as on 06.07.1999. Parties have been residing separately since 14.01.2006. A flat was purchased in Mumbai in the joint names of the parties in February, 2005. Admittedly, the EMIs of the flat have been paid by the respondent/husband. Since the amount of loan could not be cleared by the parties, the Bank took recourse to SRFAESI Act, 2002 MAT.APP.(F.C.)217/2017 Page 1 of 4 and ...
Mahender Singh vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 75/2019 MAHENDER SINGH STATE OF DELHI ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Khosla and Mr. Sarvesh Tyagi, Advs. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Naresh and SI Sumit P.S.Mohan Garden. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.1004 of 2018 under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Uttam Nagar (now transferred to Police Station Mohan Garden).2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant who was outside his house was accosted by some boys, one of whom was co accused Himanshu. They threatened him and attempted to stab him. When his father intervened they stabbed his father. The complainant received injuries on his hand whereas his father received stab wounds in his sto...
Draegerwerk Ag & Co Kgaa vs.ion Bio Med-I-Care Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EFA(OS) 21/2018 & CM Appl.No.52743/2018 (stay) DRAEGERWERK AG & CO KGAA Through Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Jyoti Kumar Singh, Ms. Shweta Bharti, Ms. Katyani Mahendru, Ms.Malllika Kamal & Ms. Upasana Chandrashekaran, Advocates ..... Appellant versus ION BIO MED-I-CARE PVT LTD Through Mr. Samrat K.Nigam, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER2603.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 1st November, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in EA No.139/2015 in Execution Petition No.271/2014.2. The aforementioned Execution Petition was filed by the Appellant/Decree Holder (DH) seeking execution of an Award dated 29th June, 2012 in its favour by the ICCs International Court of Arbitration, against the Respondent/Judgement Debtor (JD) ION Bio Med I-Care Pvt. Ltd. EFA(OS) 21/2018 Page 1 of 10 3. The disputes between the DH and the JD arising out of Joint Ve...
Smt. Gulzar Begum vs.the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:14. h March, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:26. h March, 2019 CRL.LP. 827/2018 SMT. GULZAR BEGUM ....Appellant Through: Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI Rajender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J CRL.M.A. 49520/2018 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 49521/2019 (Delay in filing) This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking condonation of 326 days delay in filing the appeal. Learned counsel for the state has no objection if the delay is condoned. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRL.A. /2019(To be numbered) Page 1 of 13 CRL. L. P. 827/2018 1. I...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »