Delhi Court March 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited vs.malvinder Mohan Singh and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. No.11934/2018 inOMP (EFA) (COMM) No.6 /2016 Reserved on:30. 10.2018 Date of decision:29.03.2019 DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED .....Decree Holder Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam & Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Ms. Kanika Singhal, Mr. Mohit Singh, Ms. Samridhi Hota, Ms. Kazmi, Mr. Rohan Jaitley, Mr. Aditya Shankar, Ms. Bani Brar, Mr. Mikhil Sharda, Mr. Kunal Chaterji, and Mr. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu, Advocates. versus MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS ..... Judgment Debtors Through Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan & Mr. Sanjay Jai, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Ms. Shikha Tandon, Mr. Abhijit Mittal, Mr. Robin Grover, and Ms. Rhea Verma, Advocates for Fortis Healthcare Limited. Mr. Akhil Sibal with Ms. Vijayalakshmi Menon, Ms. Ekta Kapil, Ms. Neeharika Aggarwal, Mr. Shobhit Ahuja, Mr. Pradeep Chhindra and Ms. Nitya Gupta, Advocates for judgment debtor Nos. 1 to 4 and 13. Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Sayib Qureshi, and Mr....
Harinder Singh & Ors vs.lt. Governor & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9698/2017, CM APPLs.39496/2017 & 46868/2018 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Leeza Taneja with Ms.Swati Yadav, Advocates. versus HARINDER SINGH & ORS LT. GOVERNOR & ANR CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachin Nawani, Advocate for R1. Mr.Ajay Verma, Sr.Standing Counsel with Ms.Sapna Chauhan & Mr.Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. % ORDER2903.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayers in the present writ petition read as under: It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate Writ Order or direction, more specifically in the nature of Certiorari to quash the. award 26/2002-2003 dated 23.10.2002 in respect of the land of... Petitioner No.1 measuring 2 acre, in Khasra No.30/16,17,24/1,25,29,31/20,21/1, further in respect of land of... Petitioner No.2,3 and 4 measuring 1 acre forming part of Khasra No.19/16/2,17/2,24/2,25/2,234/1, f...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd vs.vikas Kumar @ Vicky & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~10 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h March, 2019 + MAC.APP. 1087/2017, CM No.45052/2017(stay) IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Adv.1. versus VIKAS KUMAR @ VICKY & ORS Through: Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Adv. for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS along with Respondent no.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged an order of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.5,35,000/- has been awarded to respondent no.1.2. On 7th August, 2014, respondent no.1 was driving his scooter at Village Dhipur when he was hit by Maruti Swift Dzire Car No.DL8 AW0893from front side which resulted in grievous injuries. Respondent no.1 was taken to Babu Jagjivan Ram Memorial Hospital from where he was shifted to JPN Hospital. The respondent no.1 suffered fracture of right femur bone for which he underwent a surgery and a rod was inserted in his right leg. The Medical Board assessed t...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.sanjeev Hans and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved On: March 12th 2019 Judgement Pronounced On:29th March, 2019 CRL. L. P. 564/2015 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI Prabhakaran, PS Dabri versus SANJEEV HANS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Astha,Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By this petition under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter as Cr.P.C), the petitioner/State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 11.02.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, Dwarka Courts, Delhi whereby the respondents (1)Sanjeev Hans, (2)Sunil Jain, (3)Rohit and (4)Pankaj were acquitted of the charge under Sections 304/34, 325/34, 3and 308 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter as IPC) in Sessions Case No.21/2012 in FIR No.519/2006, PS Dabri.2. Brief facts of the case are as under:-"1. The case of the prosecution as per sta...
Shri Jose C. Mundadan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :7. h February, 2019 Decided on:-"29th March, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4363/2018 M/S RAJASTHAN CYLINDERS & CONTAINERS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sushil Gupta, Mr. Manan Verma & Mr. Siddarth Bhatia, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prashanto C. Sen, Sr. Adv. with Sanjeev Chhikara, Adv. and Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Joint Director CCI. + CRL.M.C. 5324/2018 SHRI JOSE C. MUNDADAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saiby Jose Kidangoor, Mr. Raneev Dahiya & Ms. Yammi Phazang, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. Mr. Prashanto C. Sen, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Jain, Mr. T.N. Durga Prasad, Mr. Gagan Kr. & Mr. Anoop Kr., Advs. for R-2. Crl.M.C. 4363/2018 etc. Page 1 of 24 + CRL.M.C. 5371/2018 JOSE C MUNDADAN Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Saiby Jose Kidangoor, Mr. Raneev Dahiya & Ms. Yammi Phazang, Advs. versus G...
Rohit @ Jayant vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 03.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2353/2018 & Crl. M.A. 33745/2018 ROHIT @ JAYANT STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Nair and Mr. Avdhesh Nuhiwala, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with ASI Suresh Kumar Mr. Rakesh Wadhwa and Mr. Raghav Alok, Advs. for the Complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.165/2018 under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Inderpuri.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had a dispute with the petitioner and on the day of the incident, it is alleged that complainant was standing outside his factory when the petitioner BAIL APPLN.2353/2018 Page 1 of 3 along with his father, brother and other co-accused came on the spot and starting assaul...
C S Aggarwal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h March, 2019 TEST.CAS. 8/1995 C S AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil K. Kher, Senior Advocate and with Ms.Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocates Mr.D.R. Bhatia STATE versus Through: Mr.Manoj Swarup and Mr.Akshat ..... Respondent Goel, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioner is seeking letters of administration in respect of the will dated 02nd August, 1988 of late Shanti Devi Aggarwal (hereinafter referred to as Shanti Devi).2. The petitioner instituted this petition on 22nd February, 1995 on the averments that Shanti Devi died at New Delhi on 04th January, 1995; Shanti Devi was the permanent resident of Delhi at the time of her death and she was staying at flat No.3, 4th floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110001 at the time of her death; Shanti Devi executed her last will and testament dated 02nd August, 1988 duly registered with the Sub- Registrar as documen...
Campus Eai India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.neeraj Tiwari & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h March, 2019. CS(OS) 482/2016 & IAs No.11735/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 11736/2016 (u/O XXVI R-9 CPC), 7876/2017 (u/S151CPC), 17171/2018 (u/S151CPC) & 17172/2018 (u/O XIII-A CPC) CAMPUS EAI INDIA PVT. LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Ms. Achal Shekhar and Mukul Kochar, Advs. Versus NEERAJ TIWARI & ORS ...Defendants Through: Mr. Ankit Relan, Ms. Ekta Sharma and Mr. Vishesh Kumar, Advs. for D-1. Ms. Julien George, Ms. Anu Paarcha and Mr. Arjun Gadhoke, Advs. for D- 2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff instituted this suit against defendants No.1 to 6 namely (i) Neeraj Tiwari; (ii) Girish Kumar; (iii) Shivendra Kaushik; (iv) Raoul Ghosh; (v) Orryworx Private Limited; and, (vi) Bigrock Solutions Limited, pleading (a) that the plaintiff is the exclusive subcontractor and successor in interest to CampusEAI Inc., a software information technology services and consulting comp...
Bank of Baroda vs.susmita Saha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 02.2019 Pronounced on:29. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 2143/2018 & CM APPLN. 8876/2018 BANK OF BARODA ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Praveena Gautam, Adv. with Mr.Jitesh P. Gupta, Mr.Pawan Shukla & Mr.Raja Ram, Advs. versus SUSMITA SAHA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shashank Khurana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, petitioner/Bank of Baroda seeks direction thereby setting aside order dated 24.10.2017 passed in case No.7776/1024/2017 by the learned Chief Commissioner for person with Disabilities, Delhi.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner issued an advertisement for the year 2014-2015 (13th Batch) for candidates seeking admission to one year Post Graduate Diploma in Banking and Finance (PGDBF), through Baroda Manipal School of Banking (BMSB), and subsequently, W.P.(C) 2143/2018 Page 1 of 22 appointment in the Banks Service as Probationary Officer in JMG/S-I cadre on su...
Dheeraj Jaggi & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2019
$~1 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"29th March, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4746/2015 and Crl. M.As. 13030/2016, 11985- 11986/2018 DHEERAJ JAGGI & ORS Through: Mr. D. Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State Mrs. Renuka Gupta, attorney of R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 08.10.2008. The said parties separated from each other on 05.01.2011. On 11.03.2014, the second respondent lodged first information report (FIR) no.52/2014 with police station CAW Cell Nanak Pura, alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second petitioner), his mother (third petitioner) and his sisters (fourth to seventh petitioners). On conclusion of the investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »