Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 9 of about 750 results (0.013 seconds)Ashok Jaipuria vs.tejinder Kumar Acit Central Circle 19 Income Tax Dep ...
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2859/2017 & CRL.M.A. 11859/2017 ASHOK JAIPURIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Shivika Singh and Mr. Akshay Sehgal, Mr. Karan Khaitan, Mr. Adarsh Priyadarshin and Mr. A.T. Patra, Advocates Versus TEJINDER KUMAR ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE19INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Zoheb CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Hussain, Advocates ORDER (ORAL) In a complaint under Sections 276-C(1) & 277 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2002-03, respondent had filed an application for getting the present Assessing Officer examined as an additional witness and another application for filing additional documents. Both these applications have been allowed by trial court while observing as under:-"The present complaint pertains to the undisclosed foreign bank accounts of the accused. It is to ...
Tag this Judgment!Kent Ro Systems Ltd. & Anr. Vs.vikram Jeet & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Order:26. 02.2019 + F.A.O. No.75/2019 & C.M. Nos.8780-8781/2019 KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. & Mr. Kumar Chitranshu, Advocates. Versus VIKRAM JEET & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2602.2019 F.A.O. No.75/2019 & C.M. No.8780/2019 (for stay) & C.M. No.8781/2019 (for appointment of Local Commissioner) 1. The impugned order dated 20.02.2019 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-02, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ADJ) in Civil Suit being TM No.08/2019, dismissing two applications of the appellants/plaintiffs; one under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), and another under Order XXVI Rule 9, is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal. FAO752019 Page 1 of 14 2. As per the factual matrix, the appellants company has been in the business of manufacturing and selling Mineral RO Water Purifier S...
Tag this Judgment!Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ministry of Defen ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:26. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 5173/2017 CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr Rajshekhar Rao, Ms Zehra Khan, Mr Zahid Lalq Ahmed, Advocates. :Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-1. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 14.05.2017 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the respondent, whereby the petitioner has been debarred from participating in submission of any tenders to the Director General, Married Accommodation Project (DGMAP). The said punitive measure has been taken against the petitioner on an allegation that the petitioner had failed to exercise proper financial checks during the scrutiny of the final bills relating to a contract entered into between the respondent and one ...
Tag this Judgment!Munish Dalal vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4887/2017 MUNISH DALAL Date of Order: February 26, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Divya Kumar Kaushik & Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh, Advocates Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Vishal Tiwari Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.105/2015, under Sections 323/354/509/3IPC, registered at police station Vikas Puri, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 28th July, 2016 (Annexure- B colly) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Vishal Tiwari on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits ...
Tag this Judgment!The State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.om Prakash
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 10.2018 Judgment delivered on:26. 02.2019 CRL.A. 593/2018 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP along with Inspector Satish Chandra, P.S. Badarpur, for the State. versus OM PRAKASH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumer Sethi, Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the State upon grant of leave, to assail the judgment dated 19.12.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 01, South-East District in Case No.1549/2016, SC No.54/2014 arising out of FIR No.91/2014 registered at PS Badarpur under Sections 363/354A IPC and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), acquitting the respondent/accused of the charge framed against him. Crl.A. No.593/2018 Page 1 of 24 2. The aforesaid FIR was initially...
Tag this Judgment!Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs.m/s ...
Court: Delhi
$~22 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2019 + + + HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS. O.M.P. 235/2009 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravindra Bana and Mr. Satsheel Advocates. Sheokand, (M:9811141842 & 9990920276) versus SH. SHUSHIL KUMAR ROUT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates. (M:7275432305) AND O.M.P. 62/2012 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravindra Bana and Mr. Satsheel Sheokand, Advocates. versus M/S AAR ESS & COMPANY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates. AND M/S AAR ESS & COMPANY THR SUSHIL KUMAR RAUT O.M.P. 311/2012 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Jain vs.govt. Fo Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~7 & 8 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 658/2016 & Crl.M.A. 2728/2016, 8038/2017 Decided on:-"26th February, 2019 NITIN JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Adv. versus + GOVT. FO NCT DELHI & ANR. Through: + CRL. M.C. 1968/2017 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Bikramjeet, PS Dabri. ........ Petitioner ANIL KUMAR JAIN Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Adv. versus GOVT. FO NCT DELHI & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Bikramjeet, PS Dabri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both these petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) arise out of a criminal case relating to first information report (FIR) No.55/2011 of police station Dabri, registered at the instance of the second respondent. Since they relate to facts which are substantially common and have been pressed through the same advocate for each of thes...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Pratap vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1088/2019 MANISH PRATAP Date of Order: February 26, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. I.V.Raghav & Mr. S.S. Raghav, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with ASI Praveen Kumar Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.208/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Ghazipur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 10th September, 2018 (Annexure-C) reached between the parties. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, accepts notice. Mr. Ramavtar Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of second respondent and submits that respondent No.2 is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she is unable to appear before this Court today due to personal difficulty and she has instructed him t...
Tag this Judgment!Manoranjan Biswas vs.dig Cisf & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~4 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C).11425/2017 MANORANJAN BISWAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Advocate Versus DIG CISF & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocate along with Inspector Sanjay Kumar, CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by the 1. petitioner. The petitioner has inter alia prayed that the letter bearing no.424 dated 25.07.2016, whereby the House Rent Allowance (for short HRA) benefit of the petitioner was cancelled, be set aside and declared as illegal and arbitrary. A writ of mandamus is sought to restore the HRA benefit to the petitioner from May, 2016 to March, 2017.2. The brief facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner is serving as a Constable in ...
Tag this Judgment!Thdc India Ltd vs.jai Prakash Associates Limited
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t January, 2019 Date of decision:26. h February, 2019 + O.M.P. 504/2011 THDC INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Laxmi Kumar, Advocates (M-9810208494) versus JAI PRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate (M- 9810010392) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.The present Section 34 petition has been filed challenging arbitral 1. Award dated 22nd January, 2011 passed by a three-member Tribunal. The Respondent-contractor was awarded a contract for construction of Chute and Shaft Spillways at Tehri for the Tehri Dam for the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC). The Letter of Intent was issued on 15th December, 1998. The date of commencement of the work was 29th December, 1998, with a completion period of 54 months. The scheduled date of completion was 28th June, 2003. However, the actual date of completion was 31st December, 2007. ...
Tag this Judgment!