Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vibhav Kharagpuria vs.school of Planning and Architecture
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7037/2017 & CM APPL. 29218/2017 (for stay) % 1. VIBHAV KHARAGPURIA Through: Mr. Vibhor Kush, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R. K. Singh and Ms. Deepa Rai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition is directed against a notice dated 9th August, 2017, issued by the School of Planning and Architecture (the respondent herein), whereby the petitioners admission to the said institution stood cancelled due to non-submission of OBC certificate (as per the reservation rules of Government of India).2. The facts are briefly stated.3. A notification, inviting applications for admissions to academic programmes conducted by it, for the academic session 2017-2018, was issued by the respondent. The said notification contained the following clause, in respect of reservations for Scheduled Castes/ S...
Balbir Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5688/2014 BALBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER2602.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The... Petitioner who joined General Reserve Engineering Force (GREF), BRO as Charge Mechanic [merged/re-designated as Junior Engineer (Electrical & Mechanical) - JE (E&M)]. by way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks benefits (Grade, Badge, Rank & Seniority etc.) attached with the said post of JE (E & M) at par with his counterparts who are diploma holders.2. The relevant facts that are necessary to be noted for the disposal of the present petition are as follows. The... Petitioner retired from Indian Army and applied for appointment for the post of Charge Mechanic in the category of W.P. (C) 5688/2014 P...
Ircon International Limited vs.m/s Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :21. t January, 2019 Date of decision :26th February, 2019 + O.M.P. 403/2010 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Leena Tuteja and Mr. Ishaan Chawla, Advocates. (M:9810049061) versus M/S JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate. (M:9810010392) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) challenges the impugned award dated 15th April, 2010 whereby the Ld. Sole Arbitrator has awarded the claims raised on behalf of M/s. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (hereinafter the Contractor) against IRCON International Limited (hereinafter IRCON).2. IRCON awarded contract dated 15th March, 2004 to the Contractor, for construction of civil works including tunnels, bridges, earthwork etc. in Zone-III (KM134142) of Laole Quaziund Sectio...
Amar & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1085/2019 & Crl.M.A. 4294/2019 AMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Atul Mathur, Advocate with ........ Petitioners petitioners in person Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Pradeep Kumar Mr. Parul Rohtagi, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.953/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Model Town, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st February, 2018 (Annexure-C) reached between the parties. Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State, accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by her counsel as well as by SI Pradeep Kumar on the basis of identity proof pro...
Sumer Chand Gupta & Ors vs.c B I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3739/2016 Decided on:26. h February, 2019 SUMER CHAND GUPTA & ORS Through:... Petitioner no.1 in person ........ Petitioners C B I versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had registered first information report (FIR) No.RC06/2006-EOU-IX, New Delhi on 02.11.2006 and took up investigation into offences allegedly committed under Section 120B read with Section 420, 468, 471 of Indian Penal code, 1860 (IPC) and substantive offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC. Upon conclusion of investigation, a report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) was submitted in the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) seeking trial of the petitioners for the aforementioned offences. The CMM took cognizance and issued process after securing the presence o...
Rohinish Pathak vs.medical Council of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5907/2015 & CM Appl. Nos. 10689/2015, 24631/2015 & Decided on:26. h February, 2019. 45110/2017 ROHINISH PATHAK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Ms. Shweta Soni, Mr. R.K. Mehta, Mr. Harshit Agarwal & Mr. Pramod Kali Rana, Advs. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Tarun Verma, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarti, Advs. for R- 1/MCI. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Madhuri Dhingra, Advs. for R- 2/UOI. Mr. Kirtiman Singh & Mr. Waize Ali, Advs. for R-3/NBE. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.% 1. The writ petitioner is a qualified doctor, having being granted an MBBS degree by Soochow University in Shanghai, China. By way of this writ petition, he assails the constitutional validity of Regulation 4(4) of the Screening Test Regulations, 2002 (hereinafter, the STR) issued by the Medical Council of India (hereinafter, MCI) and...
Flipkart Internet Private Limited vs.www.flipkartwinners.com & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1177/2018 & I.As.14229/2018 AND142322018 FLIPKART INTERNET PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Saurabh Srivastava with Ms.Shilpa Gupta and Mr.Vaarish K.Sawlani, Advocates. versus WWW.FLIPKARTWINNERS.COM & ORS ...... Defendants Through Mr.T.N.Durga Prasad with Mr.Gagan Kumar and Mr.Siddharth Jain, Advocates for D-6. Mr.A.C.Mishra with Ms.Pallavi Dubey, Advocates for D-15 & 26. Mr.Azhar, Advocate for D-22. Date of Decision:26. h February, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery up, damages etc. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"CS(COMM) 1177/2018 Page 1 of 8 In light of the foregoing, it is most respectfully prayed 42. that this Honble Court may be pleased to: is to trademark rights), identical and/or similar i. Pass an order and decree of permanent injunction restraining the...
Shaikh Abdul Khalik & Anr vs.director General & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:26. 02.2019 W.P. (C) 11415/2017 SHAIKH ABDUL KHALIK & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sureshan, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated 07.10.2016 passed by the respondents directing petitioner no.1 to await his turn for grant of HRA as well as to declare Rule 61 of the CISF Rule, 2001 as ultra vires and a direction to grant HRA to the petitioner no.1 along with Transport Allowance (TPT) from July 2016 to 30.06.2017 and HRA and Transport Allowance to petitioner no.2 for the period June, 2016 to May, 2017.2. The facts relevant for the present petition are, that the first petitioner was appointed as Constable GD with the CISF on 01.04.2001 while the second petitioner who is the wife of petitioner no.1,...
Sahendra Lal Treahan vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~9 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1883/2016 Decided on:26. h February, 2019 SAHENDRA LAL TREAHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Ms. Bhawani Gupta, Ms. Monalisha Chowdhury, Ms. Snigdha Singh & Ms. Sarabjeet Kaur, Advs. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. Mr. Pulkit Kaushik, Proxy Adv. for Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.239/2005 was registered by police station Lajpat Nagar on the complaint of the petitioner, the allegations having been made against second and third respondents for offences punishable under Sections 420/203/468/471/182/120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed. The second respondent is the son of the petitioner, while the third respondent is the wife of the second respondent and thus, daughter-in-law to the petitioner. The parties had been involved in some dispute in the run ...
Patanjali Ayurved Limited & Anr. Vs.google Llc. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h February, 2019 + CS(OS) 104/2019 & I.A. 2577/2019 PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar & Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocates with Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Sonali Dhir & Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal, Advocates (M-8826374673) versus GOOGLE LLC. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Senior Advocate with Ms. Mamta, Ms. Priyadarshi Banerjee, Mr. Shruttima & Ms. Sakshi Shalani, Advocates for D-1&2 (M-9502321779) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejas Karia, Ms. Richa Srivastava, Mr. Shijo George, Ms. Nayantara Narayan, Mr. Dhruv Bhatnagar, Mr. Rishabh Kapur & Ms. Mishika, Advocates for D-3 (M- 9717892442) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Plaintiffs Patanjali Ayurved Limited and Swami Ramdev through his Power of Attorney holder have approached this Court by filing the present suit for permanent and mandatory inj...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »