Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manoj Nagpal & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 27, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1157/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4499/2019 MANOJ NAGPAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate with petitioners in person Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. M. P.Singh, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Dharmendra Mr. D.K.Singh, Advocate with respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.103/2018, under Sections 420/406/ 120B/34 IPC, registered at police station Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits for respondents No.2 & 3. Upon notice, Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, are the complainant party of the FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by their counsel as well as by SI Dharmendra on the basis of identity proof produced by them.... RESPON...
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited (Earlier Known as North Delhi Po ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
John Nagar vs.hans U Nagar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 1767/2016 Decided on:-"27th February, 2019 JOHN NAGAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjwal Jha, Adv. versus + HANS U NAGAR & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. B.S. Joon, Mr. Karan Chaudhary & Mr. Neeraj Balhara, Advs. for R-1, 2 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Steps have not been taken for service of third and fourth respondents. The counsel appearing for the petitioner states that since their whereabouts are not known, he is under instructions to submit that the said parties may be dropped from array of parties, the petitioner not pressing any action against them. The names of third and fourth respondents are thus, struck off from the array of parties.2. The petition at hand challenges the orders dated 12.01.2015 and 16.03.2016 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate and Additional Sessions Judge in a complaint case (CC No.174/012012) and Crl. Rev. No.12/2015, as a result of which the criminal compl...
Raj Bhandari vs.central Board of Secondary Education and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8589/2017 RAJ BHANDARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Banamali Shukla, Adv. versus with petitioner in person CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANR Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner appears to be a man with multiple identities. In his birth certificate, the petitioners name is shown as % 1.2. Rajender Bhandari.3. The petitioner passed his X class examination in 2006 and his XII class examination in 2008. The certificates issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education (hereinafter referred to as the CBSE), on both the occasions, reflected the name of the petitioner as Rajender Singh 4. Thereafter, the petitioner obtained his B.Com degree in 2012. In his B.Com degree, dated 14th January, 2012, the name of the W.P.(C) 8589/2017 Page 1 of 4 petitioner is reflected as Bhandari Rajender Rupe...
Bses Rajdhani Power Limited vs.kanohar Electricals Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Satpal Singh vs.land Acquisition Collector & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7348/2016 & CM Appl.No.6186/2019 ........ Petitioner $~10 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SATPAL SINGH LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ORS. Through Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & versus Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain & Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/ L & B Mr. Ajay Verma, Sr.Standing counsel, Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri & Mr. Vinayak Harshwardhan, Advocates for Respondent/DDA ORDER2702.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayers in the present petition read as under: a) set aside the impugned award i.e. 10/2008-2009 (SW) passed by the Office of the ADM/LAC(SW) Room No.12, Old Terminal Tax Building, Kapashera, New Delhi-110037. b) further directions to the... RESPONDENTS to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings as per the new enactment. c) Further directions to grant compensation as per the new law by consideration of the market value of the land by setting-aside the ...
Pico Deepali Overlays Consortium vs.organizing Committee Commonwealth ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27.02.2019 + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 3/2016 PICO DEEPALI OVERLAYS CONSORTIUM ..... Decree Holder Through: Ms. Tara Shahani, Advocate. versus ORGANIZING COMMITTEE COMMONWEALTH GAMES2010..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocates for applicant/Deepali Designs & Exhibit Pvt. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) O.A. No.24/2019 (Against order dated 14.01.2019) 1. This is a chamber appeal filed against the order dated 14.01.2019, passed by the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) (in short JR).2. Via the impugned order, the JR has dismissed the application for impleadment filed by an entity going by the name: Deepali Designs and Exhibits Private Limited (in short DDEPL).3. Briefly, the background in which the application for impleadment and the instant appeal is filed are as follows:-"4. An entity by the name: Pico Deep...
Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs.m/s Kanohar Electricals Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Ajit Gogna vs.jitender Gogna & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2019. AJIT GOGNA CS(OS) 346/2016 Through: Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. Versus JITENDER GOGNA & ORS ...Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with .... Plaintiff Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Sanjeev Sahay and Ms. Prerna Sharma, Advs. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Review Petition No.439/2018 & IA No.16862/2018 (u/S151CPC) of the defendant No.1 1. Review, after disposal vide order dated 18th October, 2018 of FAO(OS) No.51/2018 preferred thereagainst with the following order: 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that appropriate for the appellant is to file an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge seeking review of the impugned order on the grounds as urged by the learned Sr. Counsel for the appellant today before us. If such a review application is filed before the learned Single Judge within a period of on...
Raj Singh & Ors. Vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2019
$~27 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4612/2014 & CM Appl.No.9177/2014 (stay) ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Esha Mazumdar & Mr. Setu Viket, Advocates versus RAJ SINGH & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ........ RESPONDENTS LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Sr.Standing counsel with Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for Respondent/DDA Mr. Yeeshu Jain with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L & B % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2602.2019 1. The prayers in the petition as amended pursuant to the permission granted by this Court by an order dated 21st February, 2015 read as under: thereof, the nature thereby quashing a. writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the notification No.F.10(29)/96/L&B/LA/19599 u/s 6 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 dated 20/03/2013 and in consequence thereof quashing notification No.10 (29)/96/L & B/ LA11394 dated 27/10/1999 under section 4 of the said act. (bb) wri...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »