Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pawan Shah & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 04, 2019 CRL.M.C. 577/2019 PAWAN SHAH & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, for Ms. Priyanka Verma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 and prosecutrix in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 2416/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 577/2019 Quashing of FIR No.61/2017, under Sections 354/354B/5of IPC & 8 of POCSO Act, registered at police station Narela, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 of 28th January, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 and prosecutrix are present in the Court and has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis of identity proof produced by her. C...
Anju vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi &Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 730/2016 Judgment delivered on:04. 02.2019 ANJU ........ Petitioner Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kr.Ranjan, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Vikram Singh, P.S.Karawal Nagar. Mr.Kishan N.Rana, Adv. for R-2 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 17.08.2016 whereby the Revisional Court has accepted the revision petition filed by respondents Nos. 2 to 7 and set aside the order on charge and discharged the respondents of the charge under Section 498A/34 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Revisional Court has erred in not appreciating that there was sufficient material available on record to substantiate framing of charge under Section 498A/34 IPC. CRL.REV.P7302016 Page 1 of 4 3. Per contra, learned cou...
Bimla Sachdev vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12172/2016 & CM APPLs. 48057/2016, 15579/2018 BIMLA SACHDEV Through: Mr. Sameer Rohatgi Mr.Akshi Pradhan, Advs. ........ Petitioner and % 1.2. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Sharma, Mr. Mohit Siwach and Mr. Rohit Kaliyar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The facts, in this case, are undisputed. Sh. Lila Krishan Sachdev, the deceased husband of the petitioner, Bimla Sachdev, was declared successful, in a draw of lots, conducted by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the DDA), on 20th August, 1975, for allotment of a residential plot, in the Low/Middle Income Group Scheme of the DDA and was, consequently, allotted plot No.C-71, Vikas Puri, New Delhi. Subsequently thereto, on 29th September, 1975, the petitioners husband deposited the amount demanded by the DDA.3. Physical possession of the plot was hand...
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited vs.veritas Investment Research Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decision dated:4. h February, 2019 + + CS(OS) 1006/2015 & I.As. 7612/2015, 16813/2015, 19265/2015, 20026/2015 INDIABULLS REAL ESTATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Mr. Aayush Malhotra & Ms. Abhilasha Vij, Advocates (M-9560703760) versus GEETA ANAND & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Dube & Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, Advs. (M-9891860220) Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Mamta Tiwari & Ms. Charu Ambwani, Advs. (M- 7838683884) for D-4 CS(OS) 1016/2015 & I.As. 7682/2015, 16808/2015 INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AND ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Mamta Tiwari & Ms. Charu versus Ambwani, Advocates VERITAS INVESTMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Dube & Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, Advocates Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Mr. Aayush Malhotra & Ms. Abhilasha Vij, Advocates for D-4 CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) 1. The Plaintiff, India Bulls Real Estate Limited and India ...
Ifci Ltd. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 04, 2019 CRL.M.C. 620/2019 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 2554-2555/2019 IFCI LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Mr. Nikhil Menon, Mr. Somay Kapoor and Mr. Zeeshan Diwan, Advocates Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Budhiraja, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Aman Gupta, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.99/2018, under Sections 406/420/120B registered at P.S.: Economic Offence Wing (EOW), Delhi is sought on merits. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that the investigation of this FIR is at preliminary stage and no coercive steps against petitioner are contemplated as of now. CRL. M.C. 620/2019 Page 1 of 2 Learned counsel for petitioner submits that allegations leveled in the FIR a...
Bharti vs.ramji Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:04. 02.2019 % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 72/2018 B Through: Ms. Kavita Kapil, Advocate ..... Appellant R Y versus ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 12.02.2018 passed by the Family Court by which the petition filed by the appellant/wife seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been dismissed. Despite service, none has chosen to appear in the matter on behalf of the respondent/husband. We may note that the respondent/husband had not appeared even before the Family Court and the matter was proceeded ex-parte.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 29.03.2007 at District Aara, Bihar. One male child was born on 18.06.2007 from the said wedlock, who is in the ...
Vikas vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2099/2018 VIKAS ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 2534/2018 VIKRAM STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Jaiswal with Mr. Deepak Choudhary and Mr. Sanju Rana, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh, PS Samaipur Badli. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.599/2018 under Sections 394/397/5of the IPC registered at Police Station Samai Pur Badli, Delhi. BAIL APPLN.2099/2018 & BAIL APPLN.2534/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was walking on the road when he was apprehended by a boy from behind who had his face covered with a handkerchief. In the scuffle, the handkerc...
Dev Raj Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6690/2010 DEV RAJ SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Madhu Mukul Tripathi and Mr Arvind Kumar, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Ms. Anju Bhattacharya, Ms. Deepika Kumari and Ms. N. Chandra, Advs. for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0402.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the decision of respondent no.2 to reject the petitioner's claim for reimbursement of 5,31,510/- incurred by the petitioner for his medical treatment.2. The controversy involved in the present petition is whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefits of the scheme framed by respondent no.2- Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation (hereafter DSCSC) for providing medical benefits to its employees. Whereas, the petitioner claims that he is entitled to the same notwithstanding that he is not a member of the said Scheme and had not contributed to the same; t...
Yogesh Alias Sonu Tharu vs.the State.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 19th November, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 04th February, 2019 CRL.A. 234/2016 PRADEEP DABAS ....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior advocate with Mr.R.S. Malik, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav and Mrs. Aayushi S. Khazanchi, Advocates THE STATE. Versus . Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with insp. Ajay Kumar, + CRL.A. 236/2016 YOGESH@ SONU THARU .... Appellant I.O (Original), PS Bholaswa Dairy Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior advocate with Mr.R.S. Malik, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav and Mrs. Aayushi S. Khazanchi, Advocates THE STATE. Versus Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with insp. Ajay Kumar, I.O (Original), PS Bholaswa Dairy CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J CRL.A. 234/2016 & CRL.A. 236/2016 1. The present Appeals are instituted on behalf of the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter ref...
Surinder Aggarwal vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 04, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2422/2018 SURINDER AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Brij Bhushan Solanki, Advocate Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sachin Mann Mr. Krishan Garg, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.342/2013, under Sections 420/120-B of IPC registered at police station Begum Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 18th April, 2018 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Krishan Garg, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is c...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »