Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harish Chandra Joshi vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 05, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2830/2018 & CRL.M.A. 10039/2018 HARISH CHANDRA JOSHI Through: Mr. Vishalakshi Singh, Advocate .....Petitioner versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State SI Chetan Mandia Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.162/2009, under Sections 193/196/197/198/421/468/120B of IPC, registered at P.S.: Economic Offences Wing, Delhi is sought on merits in this petition. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed. Learned counsel for petitioner relies upon orders of 3rd May, 2018 (Annexure-A) in CO.PET. 418/1998 titled In the matter of M/s Vinkas General Carbon Ltd. and of 4th February, 2013 in CRL.M.C. 3627/2012 titled Sushil Singhla & Anr. vs. State & Anr. to seek quashing of FIR in question. Since...
Vikram vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2099/2018 VIKAS ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 2534/2018 VIKRAM STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Jaiswal with Mr. Deepak Choudhary and Mr. Sanju Rana, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh, PS Samaipur Badli. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.599/2018 under Sections 394/397/5of the IPC registered at Police Station Samai Pur Badli, Delhi. BAIL APPLN.2099/2018 & BAIL APPLN.2534/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was walking on the road when he was apprehended by a boy from behind who had his face covered with a handkerchief. In the scuffle, the handkerc...
State vs.ashish @ Nirmaland Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 05th December, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 4th February, 2019 + CRL.LP. 655/2017 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu ASC (Crl.) with Ms. Suman Saharan and Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocates for State with SI Amit Rana, Police Station - Swaroop Nagar versus ASHISH @ NIRMAL& ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Akhil Sharma and Ms. Isha Aggarwal, Advs. for respondent No.1. Mr. K. Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The present leave petition has been filed by the State under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) assailing the impugned judgment dated 04.03.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in case FIR No.125/2012 under Sections 302/363/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter refe...
Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd vs.geeta Anand & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decision dated:4. h February, 2019 + + CS(OS) 1006/2015 & I.As. 7612/2015, 16813/2015, 19265/2015, 20026/2015 INDIABULLS REAL ESTATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Mr. Aayush Malhotra & Ms. Abhilasha Vij, Advocates (M-9560703760) versus GEETA ANAND & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Dube & Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, Advs. (M-9891860220) Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Mamta Tiwari & Ms. Charu Ambwani, Advs. (M- 7838683884) for D-4 CS(OS) 1016/2015 & I.As. 7682/2015, 16808/2015 INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AND ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Mamta Tiwari & Ms. Charu versus Ambwani, Advocates VERITAS INVESTMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Dube & Mr. Rajul Shrivastava, Advocates Ms. Mumtaz Bhalla, Mr. Aayush Malhotra & Ms. Abhilasha Vij, Advocates for D-4 CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) 1. The Plaintiff, India Bulls Real Estate Limited and India ...
Rajesh Kumar Pandey vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 04, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2118/2017 & Crl.M.As. 8711/2017, 12176/2017 CRL.M.C. 3569/2017 and CRL.M.As.14525-14527/2017 & 16730/2017 RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bankim Kulshreshtha and Mr. Attar Singh, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP for CBI with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned first petition, challenge is to impugned order of 7th April, 2017 which rejects petitioners application for further investigation. Similar application of petitioner in connected case stands dismissed by the trial court vide order of 13th July, 2017, which is assailed in the above captioned second petition. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned two petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Learned counsel for petition...
Aarshiya Gulati (Minor) Thr. Next Friend & Ors vs.kuldeep Singh Gulati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2223/2013 & I.A. 18257/2013, I.A. 18981/2013, I.A. 19439/2013, I.A. 4408/2014, I.A. 11701/2014, I.A. 14676/2014, I.A. 3114/2015, I.A. 9434/2015, I.A. 9564/2016 AARSHIYA GULATI (MINOR) THR. NEXT FRIEND & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divyanshu Goyal and Ms. Swati Jain, Advocates as well as Ms. Divya Gulati in person. versus KULDEEP SINGH GULATI & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. V.K. Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aditya Soni, Advocate for D-1, 2 and 5. Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate for D-3. Mr. Mudit Gupta, Advocate for D-4. Reserved On :21. t December, 2018 Date of Decision:04. h February, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 4780/2014 1. Present application being I.A. 4780/2014 has been filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on behalf of the defendants No.1, 2 and 5 for rejection of the plaint filed by the minor plaintiffs through their mother. CS (OS) 2223/2013 Page 1 o...
u.p. State Bridge Corporation Ltd vs.dda & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 663/2012 Date of Decision :4. h February, 2019 U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.K.Chandwani, Mr.Sameer Chandwani, Advs. versus DDA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vaibhav Agnihotri, Mr.Bhrigu Dhami, Mr.Rudresh Jagdala, Mr.Vinayak Harshwardhan, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 09.04.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the following work that had been awarded in favour of the petitioner by respondent no.1 vide its letter dated 24.02.2003:-"(i) Construction of one clover leaf to Sarita Vihar flyover at intersection of NH-2 Road No.13-A, OMP No.663/2012 Page 1 (ii) Construction of one clove...
M/S Satya Parkash & Bros (P) Ltd vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
% + * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h February, 2019 FAO(OS) 27/2019, CM Nos. 5217/2019, 5218/2019 & 5219/2019 M/S SATYA PARKASH & BROS (P) LTD Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. ..... Appellant versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM Nos. 5217/2019 & 5218/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM No.5219/2019 (for delay) This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 30 days delay in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 30 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO (OS) 27/2019 Page 1 of 9 FAO(OS) 27/2019 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated November 14, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in O.M.P. 27/2012 filed by the a...
Pradeep Dabas vs.the State.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 19th November, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 04th February, 2019 CRL.A. 234/2016 PRADEEP DABAS ....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior advocate with Mr.R.S. Malik, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav and Mrs. Aayushi S. Khazanchi, Advocates THE STATE. Versus . Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with insp. Ajay Kumar, + CRL.A. 236/2016 YOGESH@ SONU THARU .... Appellant I.O (Original), PS Bholaswa Dairy Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior advocate with Mr.R.S. Malik, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav and Mrs. Aayushi S. Khazanchi, Advocates THE STATE. Versus Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with insp. Ajay Kumar, I.O (Original), PS Bholaswa Dairy CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J CRL.A. 234/2016 & CRL.A. 236/2016 1. The present Appeals are instituted on behalf of the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter ref...
Ajay Kumar & Ors. Vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 04, 2019 CRL.M.C. 6336/2018 AJAY KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ram Naresh, Advocate Versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Pawan Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.6336/2018 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 6336/2018 Quashing of FIR No.280/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Kalkaji, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 1st September, 2018 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pawan Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 6336/2018 Page 1 of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »