Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raunaq Singh Sawhney vs.central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2152/2018 % 1. RAUNAQ SINGH SAWHNEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Tyagi, Adv. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for CBSE ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a mandamus to the respondent Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to change the name of the father of the petitioner, in the Class X class mark sheet issued to it, from Raminder S. Sawhney to Raminder Singh Sawhney.2. Admittedly, the name of the petitioner, is Raunaq Singh Sawhney. In his Class X certificate, his name was recorded as W.P.(C) 2152/2018 Page 1 of 3 Raunaq S. Sawhney and the name of his father is recorded as Raminder Sawhney.3. It is not in dispute that, in all other official documents including the Aadhaar Card, birth certificate and other school records of the petitioner, the ...
Sainath Sales and Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.government of Nct of De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision :5. h February, 2019 W.P.(C)No.1170/2019 SAINATH SALES AND SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Mr. Saurabh Mishra and Mr. Himanshu Pal Singh, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Additional Standing Counsel, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) CM Nos.5269-70/2019 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C)No.1170/2019 & CM No.5268/2019 1. The petitioners, security and sanitation providing agencies, complain of violation of their rights under Articles 14 and 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and seek directions for setting aside certain conditions (Para 1.4, 2.2.9 and 3.3.2 of the Instructions to Bidders) in the Notice Inviting Tenders (NIT hereafter) issued by the W.P.(C)No.1170/2019 Page 1 of 9 respondent, Govt....
Harendra Singh Khokhar vs.m/s Japna Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 646/2017, CRL.M.A.-. 27Date of Order: February 05, 2019 VIPUL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain, Ms. Barkha Rastogi, Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Mr. Ayush Jindal, Mr. Khurram Salim & Ms. Shephali Ailawadi, Advocates. versus M/S JAPAN ESTATE PVT LTD Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Advocate. .....Respondent CRL.M.C. 1323/2017, CRL.M.A.-5339-5340/2017 HARENDRA SINGH KHOKHAR Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with .....Petitioner Mr. Mudit Jain, Ms. Barkha Rastogi, Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Mr. Ayush Jindal, Mr. Khurram Salim & Ms. Shephali Ailawadi, Advocates. versus M/S JAPNA ESTATE PVT LTD Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Advocate. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Since the above captioned petitions arise out of one complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI CRL.M.C. 646/2017 & CRL.M.C. 1323/2017 Page 1 of 4 Act), therefore with the consent of learned counsel for ...
State of Nct of Delhi vs.shyamlal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 720/2017 Judgment delivered on:05. 02.2019 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus SHYAMLAL & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Ms. Purnima, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 with respondent Nos.1 and 2 in person. SI Sunil Kumar, PS Govind CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. State has filed this revision petition impugning order dated 20.02.017, whereby, respondents have been discharged of the offences under Section 498A/34/304B IPC.... RESPONDENTS are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already facing trial.2. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that the Trial Court has erred in not appreciating the entire material that was placed on record along with the chargesheet and ba...
J R William Singh vs.the Institute of Chartered Accountants
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA2452018 J R WILLIAM SINGH .....Appellant Through: Ms Tamali Wad and Ms Saumya Jain, versus Advocates. THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ....Respondent Through: Mr Rakesh Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT0502.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 2nd April, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition being W.P.(C) No.8681/2005 filed by the Appellant was dismissed. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge held that the prayer of the Appellant that he should be granted the pay scale in the designation of Section Officer (SO) since 5th March, 1993 under the Time-Bound Promotion Scheme (TBPS) and as Executive Officer (EO) from 5th March, 2002 cannot be granted.2. The background facts are that the Appellant joined the Central Office of the Institute of the Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) (the Respondent herein) on Del...
Shri Hitesh Sharma & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 05, 2019 CRL.M.C. 639/2019 SHRI HITESH SHARMA & ANR Through: Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Rajender Singh Mr. Amit Biswas, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 2659/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 639/2019 Quashing of FIR No.1119/2015, under Sections 354/451/509/506(1)/3of IPC, registered at police station Malviya Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Affidavit of 16th January, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Amit Biswas, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent...
Ngk Spark Plug Co. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 4882/2013 NGK SPARK PLUG CO. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Panjwani and Sheikh F. Kalia, Advs. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. G. Tushar Rao and Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advs for R1and 2. Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv. for R4. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 25th July, 2011 (hereafter the impugned order) rejecting the petitioners application under Section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereafter the Companies Act).2. The petitioner had, inter alia, filed the aforesaid application praying that directions be issued to respondent no.4 to delete the W.P.(C) 4882/2013 Page 1 of 14 letters NTK from respondent no.4s corporate name NTK Bearings Private Limited. The said application was founded o...
M/S Popular Steel vs.raj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) No.7107/2012 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Satender Verma, Adv. M/S POPULAR STEEL + W.P.(C) 7108/2012 RAJ KUMAR versus Through: Mr.H.R. Jha, Adv. ..... Respondent M/S POPULAR STEEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Satender Verma, Adv. versus JAHANGIR ALAM Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. At the outset, it may be noted that on 01.02.2019, the parties were granted one final opportunity of six weeks to file their written submissions. However, at the joint request of the learned counsel for the parties, a short adjournment was granted and the matter was listed for W.P.(C) 7107-2012 & W.P.(C) 7108-2012 Page 1 of 11 today. Today, the learned counsel for the parties have handed over their written submissions in Court itself and, therefore, with the consent of all the parties, the matter has been taken up for final disposal.2. Vide the present peti...
Shri Aman Agarwal vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 05, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1520/2017 BAIL APPLN. 1539/2017 SHRI VIRENDER BANSAL SHRI AMAN AGARWAL .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Fanish K. Jain and Mr. Deepanshu Garg, Advocates Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Tulika Mr. R.S. Goswami, Mr. Sahil Munjal and Mr. Anish Sharma, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two anticipatory bail applications, petitioners are father-in-law and husband of the complainant-Ekta Aggarwal, at whose instance FIR No.98/2017 under Sections 498A/406/354/3of IPC, was registered at police station Keshav Puram, Delhi. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned two bail applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. While entertaining these bail applications, interim protection was ...
Luv Kush vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2019
$~15 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 1738/2018 Decided on:5. h February, 2019 LUV KUSH Through: Mr. Rajesh Bagga& Mr. Manoj ........ Petitioner versus Nagar, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Govind Puri. Ms. Shalini Sharma & Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 14.11.2010. On 18.06.2013, she lodged first information report (FIR) No.416/2013 with police station Govind Puri under Sections 498A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against the petitioner (husband). On conclusion of the investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on which cognizance was taken, the said matter being pending on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate. The petitioner is on trial on the charge for offence...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »