Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Mallarika Sinha Roy and Ors. Vs.jawaharlal Nehru University and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6855/2018 & C.M.APPLN. 2309/2019 DR. MALLARIKA SINHA ROY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Ranvir Singh, Adv. with Mr.Rahul Chaprana, Adv. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS. Through Ms.Monika Arora, Standing counsel ........ RESPONDENTS with Mr.Harsh Ahuja, Mr.Kushal Kumar & Mr.Praveen Singh, Advs. with Mr.Naveen (officer) for JNU. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The main prayer in the present petition is to quash and set aside orders dated 19.12.2016, 16.03.2017, 05.04.2017, 24.08.2017, 19.09.2017 and 01.06.2018 whereby the term of the petitioners as Wardens of the various hostels has been expired.2. Annexure P-10 speaks about the terms of the wardens in some other cases where Dr.Ram Nath Jha has been warden of Sutlej hostel for 16 years, Dr.Sunita Reddy of Godavari hostel for 14 years, Dr.Rajan Kumar of WP (C) 6855/2018 Page 1 of 6 Narmada hos...
Rohitash Institute of Elementary Education vs.national Counil for Teac ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5965/2018 % 1. ROHITASH INSTITUTE OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, SC- NCTE with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Adv. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as The Act), which came into force on 29th December, 1993, provided for the establishment of a National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as NCTE), aimed, inter alia, at achieving planned and coordinated development of the teachers education system in the country, regulation and proper maintenance of norms and achievement of appropriate standards in the system of education of teachers.2. On 26th November, 2012, the NCTE issued a Public Notice, inviting applications for recogn...
Rakesh Jain vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 02.2019 CRL.L.P. 164/2019 & Crl. M.A. Nos.4473-75/2019 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) RAKESH JAIN STATE & ANR. Versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Charan Singh and Mr. S.C.Sharma, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, Additional Public Prosecutor for State.1. The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order dated 24.07.2018 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (East), Karkardooma Court, Delhi, dismissing his complaint case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act). It is the petitioner's case that the impugned order erred in so far as it did not take into account the prior business relationship between the petitioner and respondent no.2 on account of which the petitioner had given a loan of Rs.5,00,000/- to respondent no.2. Moreover, the impugned order also disregarded the statement of respondent no.2, where he admits to hav...
Anil Kumar vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1130/2019 & Crl.M.A. 4420/2019 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Javed Ashraf Khan, Advocate Date of Order: February 27, 2019 STATE & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Prem Pal Sharma Mr. Mohd. Ayaz, Advocate with respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.625/2018, under SectionsIPC, registered at police station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 6th February, 2019 of second and third respondents. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, are the complainant party of the FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by SI Prem Pal Sharma on the basis of identity proof produced by them.... RESPONDENTS No.2, wife of petitioner and respondent No.3, daughter of p...
Living Media India Limited vs.lallantop Media and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~O-21 * % + 1. Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 CS(COMM) 1054/2018 & I.A.10158/2018 LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED Through: Mr. Sajad Sultan, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus LALLANTOP MEDIA AND ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants JUDGMENT (ORAL) The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent and mandatory IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI injunction and damages against defendant No.1.2. The plaintiff is a part of India Today Group which is into media business for more than four decades. The plaintiff created and registered an online domain name THELALLANTOP.COM on 16th October, 2015 and designed a full-fledged Hindi News website catering to news, entertainment, sports and overall infotainment. The plaintiff in order to protect and secure its trademark/brand name THELALLANTOP.COM filed trademark applications for registration of trademark THELALLANTOP.COM under various classes, which are currently registered in favour of the plaintiff under TM application No.3527389 under...
Minni Chaudhary vs.iqbal Singh @ Iqbal Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"27th February, 2019 CRL. M.C. 2681/2016 & Crl.M.A. 11481/2016 MINNI CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi, Adv. versus + IQBAL SINGH @ IQBAL AHMED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Prakarsh Airan & Mr. Apoorva Ahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was married to the respondent on 01.01.1993 and gave birth to a daughter on 01.11.1995, the child being named Divyanshi. It has been the case of the petitioner that she separated from the respondent sometime in June, 2001, the child having continued to be in her custody. It is alleged by her that on 15.08.2013, the respondents driver had taken the girl to market, but instead took her out of her guardianship she being sent away to Dubai. It is against this backdrop that she claims to have visited the office of the respondent on 15.08.2013. She filed a criminal complaint on 19.12.2013 alleging offences p...
The Self Financing Educational Institutions Association vs.ggsip Unive ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2019 W.P.(C) 7966/2017 THE SELF FINANCING EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ........ Petitioner ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Rohatgi, Mr. Namit Suri, Mr. Kunal Kumar, Mr. Akshit Pradhan, Ms. Shibani, Ms. Vaishali Rawat and Ms. Parul, Advs. versus GGSIP UNIVERSITY AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition, which has been filed by the Self Financing Educational Institutions Association, essentially seeks to submit that the members of the petitioner-association were, by virtue of a judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 31st August, 2017 in W.P.(C) 2217/2016, entitled to recover arrears of fee for the academic session 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, but that, as degrees were being awarded by the Respondent No.1 University (hereinafter referred to as the Un...
Bses Yamuna Power Limited vs.kanohar Electricals Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~12, 14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2019 12 + 14 + 15 + BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED O.M.P. (COMM) 268/2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016, 267/2016, 268/2016 & 300/2016 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2016 Through: Mr. Manish ........ Petitioner Srivastava, Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. (M:9971635549) versus M/S KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. (M:9810126664 & 9599248485) WITH O.M.P. (COMM) 267/2016 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED Through: Appearance not given. versus ........ Petitioner KANOHAR ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani, Mr. S. C. Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Kshitiz Rao, Mr. Mannat Singh, Ms. Mythili Srinivasamurhty and Mr. Aditya Shrotriya, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Hars...
Abhinav Jain & Anr vs.j.v.restaurant pvt.ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~OS-26 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :27. 02.2019 CS(OS) 624/2017 ABHINAV JAIN & ANR. Through None versus J.V.RESTAURANT PVT.LTD. Through None ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This matter was heard on 15.02.2019. However, while signing the order it was thought necessary to seek some clarification from the plaintiffs. The matter has been listed several times for directions i.e. on 20.02.2019 and 25.02.2019 but none has appeared for the plaintiffs. The defendant had not also appeared on 15.02.2019 or thereafter. IA No.15346/2018 1. This application is filed under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree of Rs.3,15,47,547/- based on admissions.2. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking a decree of possession and recovery of arrears of rents against the defendant for the suit premises being Nos.N-and 64B, First Floor, Connaught Circus, New Delhi, measuring 7920 sq. ft. (hereinafter referred...
Om Parkash Jatav vs.subhash Chand Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:27. 02.2019 Tr. P. (C) No.233/2018 OM PARKASH JATAV Through:... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Versus SUBHASH CHAND JAIN & ORS. Through: Respondent No.1 in person. .....Respondents Mr.Pawan Kumar Jain, for R2, R3 & R4. Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for R5 along with ASI Dharambir. Mr. Deepak Kumar, DEO SR-VIII, Geeta Colony. Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khad, ASC (Civil), GNCTD for R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL The petitioner seeks transfer of his civil suit No.388/2016 1. pending in the Court of Ms.Shuchi Laler, learned Additional District Judge-04 (East District), KKD Complex, Delhi (ADJ) to Shahdara district for the reason that the suit property falls within the jurisdiction of Shahdara District. He draws the attention to the order dated 12.04.2018 passed in this regard by learned ADJ.2. Since the property in question is situated at Shahdara District, the said civil suit is ordered to be transferred to the Cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »