Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 2 of about 750 results (0.018 seconds)Aarushi Goyal vs.central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:-"25.02.2019. Date of Decision:-"28.02.2019. + W.P.(C) 8552/2017 AARUSHI GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Khagesh B.Jha with Ms.Shikha Sharma, Advs. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J Review Petition No.432/2018 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 09.02.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.8552/2017, whereby this Court while directing the respondent/C.B.S.E. to supply the petitioner with copies of her revaluated answer-sheets in the subjects of Economics and English (Core), had rejected her prayer for a direction to the respondent to carry out a further re-evaluation of her aforesaid answer-sheets.2. The facts emerging from the record that are necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are that the petitioner, a commerce student had appeared for her Class XII AISSCE examination condu...
Tag this Judgment!Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs.noble Chartering Inc.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 225/2018 & IA71362018 Reserved on:20. 12.2018 Date of decision :28. 02.2019 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Santosh Kumar, Mr.Sarthak Agarwal, Advs. versus NOBLE CHARTERING INC. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.K.Ramabhadran, Sr. Adv. with Mr.J.K.Asher, Mr.B.H.Patel, Mr.D.Mehrotra, Mr.Sudhanshu Sikka, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Award dated 27.12.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator.2. The parties entered into a Contract of Affreightment (hereinafter referred to as the COA) on 20.08.2008. The period of the contract was three years from September, 2008 to August, 2011. The Cargo quantity was specified as 18,00,000 MT of coking coal (5% more or less at petitioners option), with parcel size of 70,000 MT (5% more ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Titoo Chadha & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1168/2019 SHRI TITOO CHADHA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Anand Prakash Mr. Sanjay Verma & Ms. Kavita Chopra, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1038/2014, under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 20th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by her counsel as well as by SI Anand Prakash on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar vs.state (g.n.c.t) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:08. 02.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:28. 02.2019 CRL.A. 328/2003 MANOJ KUMAR Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, Advocate, Amicus ... Appellant versus STATE (G.N.C.T) OF DELHI Curiae ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Ranbir Singh, P.S. Nangloi. CRL.A. 543/2003 RAMESH KUMAR ... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State SI Ranbir Singh, P.S. Nangloi. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MS JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present batch of criminal appeals, being Criminal Appeal Nos. 328/2003 and 543/2003 instituted under the provisions of section 374 of the CRL.A. 328/2003&543/2003 Page 1 of 18 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C), assail the judgment dated 29.11.2002 and order on sentence dated 30.11.2002, rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessio...
Tag this Judgment!g.l. Bajaj Educational Trust (Regd.) and Ors. Vs.state Bank of India a ...
Court: Delhi
$~29. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2083/2019 Date of Decision:28. 02.2019 G. L. BAJAJ EDUCATIONAL TRUST (REGD.) AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rahul Gupta, Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Mr.V. K. Jain, Ms. Priyal Jain, Ms.Mehtaab Singh Sandhu and Mr.Pratishth Kaushal, Advs. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A.K. Singh, Mr. S.N. Kapoor, Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Ms.Khushboo Kapur, Ms. Alisha Kalra and Mr.Sourjya Das, Advs. for R-1 with Mr. Kishan Lal, SBI AGM and Mr.Saurabh Singh, SBI, DM (Law). Mr. S.K. Garg, Advocate for the respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.208/2019 1. Since the Caveator has entered appearance, Caveat stands discharged. W.P.(C.) No.2083/2019 Page 1 of 35 C.M. No.9699/2019 2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C...
Tag this Judgment!T T v Dhinakaran vs.the Election Commission of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI08h February, 2019 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on 28th February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10725/2017 V K SASIKALA Through : Dr.A.M.Singhvi, ... Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr.Vivek Singh, Mr.N. Raja Senthoor Pandian, Ms. Mary Mitzy, Ms.Shakun Sharma, Ms.Harshal Gupta and Ms.Devyani Gupta, Advocates versus THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for respondent Kohli, Ms.Garima Sengupta, no.1/ECI Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr.K.V. Viswanathan and Mr.Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, Mr.Siddhant Jain, Ms.Pallavi Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Ms.Lakshmi Rao, Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Mr.Harsh Vaidyanathan Shankar, Mr.Ram Shankar, Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Mr.Ravi Raghunath, Ms.Srishti Govil, Mr.Arunava Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Mr.Babu Murugavel, Mr.Prakash Kumar Gandhi and Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Samsung Electronics Co Ltd & Anr vs.lakhan a & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 255/2018 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Advocate Sahay, with Mr. Ayush Advocate. versus LAKHAN A & ORS. ...... Defendants Through Mr. Nishant Sharma, Proxy counsel for defendant no.34 and defendants no.8 and 21 are exparte Date of Decision:28. h February, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction, infringement of trademarks and copyrights, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, rendition of accounts, delivery up and recovery of damages etc.2. In the plaint, it is stated that the plaintiffs are a part of Samsung Group of companies which is a South Korean multinational CS(COMM) 255/2018 Page 1 of 5 conglomerate company established in Seoul, Korea under the house mark and trademark SAMSUNG. It is stated in the plaint that the plaintiff no.1 since its inception has grown to be one of the worlds mos...
Tag this Judgment!Nimish Jain & Anr. Vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1177/2019 & Crl.M.A. 4572/2019 NIMISH JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocates Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Hari Ram Ms. Anusuyea, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.578/2014, under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC, registered at police station Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 1st November, 2018 (Annexure P-2). Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/ first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by her counsel as well as by SI Hari Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in ...
Tag this Judgment!Symphony Ltd. Vs.thermo King India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h February, 2019 + CS (COMM) 321/2018 SYMPHONY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Advocate. (M:9818844415) versus THERMO KING INDIA PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Symphony Ltd. (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered designs and for damages. The Plaintiff is a company, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of consumer home appliances including air coolers. The design for the model Symphony Storm 70i was registered on 14th March, 2011 under Classification 23-04 (Air Cooler) bearing Design Registration No.235189.2. Copies of the the representation sheets and registration certificates for each of the models have been filed on record and have been exhibited as Ex. PW-1/8. The design is registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and is val...
Tag this Judgment!Rihan Khan vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"28th February, 2019 BAIL APPLICATION no.3045/2018 + RIHAN KHAN STATE Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Javed Ali, Mr. Pradeep, Mr. Prinay Vasandani & Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with Insp. Ram Niwas, SHO Nabi Karim. Mr. Sumit Kumar & Mr. Rabindra Nath, Advs. for complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This petition for release on bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), in case arising out of first information report (FIR) No.224/2016, involving offences punishable under Sections 354A/365/367/376/377/342/506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) of police station Nabi Karim, has brought to light a very disturbing background. Bail Appl. 3045/2018 Page 1 of 22 2. The petitioner is ...
Tag this Judgment!