Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 10 of about 750 results (0.020 seconds)Kuldeep vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1101/2019 & Crl.M.A. 4329/2019 KULDEEP Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with WSI Vidya Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.179/2014, under Sections 354D/506 IPC, registered at police station Paschim Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 5th January, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by WSI Vidya on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, affirms the contents of her Affidavit of 5th January, 2019 supporting this petition and s...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Aar Ess & Company Thr Sushil Kumar Raut vs.haryana State Industria ...
Court: Delhi
$~22 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2019 + + + HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS. O.M.P. 235/2009 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravindra Bana and Mr. Satsheel Advocates. Sheokand, (M:9811141842 & 9990920276) versus SH. SHUSHIL KUMAR ROUT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates. (M:7275432305) AND O.M.P. 62/2012 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravindra Bana and Mr. Satsheel Sheokand, Advocates. versus M/S AAR ESS & COMPANY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates. AND M/S AAR ESS & COMPANY THR SUSHIL KUMAR RAUT O.M.P. 311/2012 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Bhagwat Prasad vs.laxman and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:26. h February, 2019 + MAC.APP. 181/2014 BHAGWAT PRASAD S/o Sh. Gokal Dev, R/o H-5, 2nd Floor, Daveli, Delhi. ...Appellant Through: Mr. D. S. Bhandari, along with Advocate Appellant in person. versus 1. LAXMAN S/o Bishan Singh R/o Ni 71, Dugarpur Mohalla, Johripur, Delhi.2. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Suman Bagga, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The instant appeal is arising from the impugned award dated 07.11.2013 in MACT Case No.2passed by Sh. Dinesh Bhatt, Presiding Officer, MACT-2 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) whereby the... Petitioner (Appellant herein) was awarded Rs. 1,46,572/- (Rupees One Lakh MAC.APP. 181/2014 Page 1 of 6 Forty Six Thousand Five Hundred and Seventy Two Only) at 9% p.a. from the date of filing of DAR i.e. 13.05.2013 till the date of its r...
Tag this Judgment!P B vs.p
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + P B P Date of Judgment:26. 02.2019 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 54/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ankit Mutreja, Mr.Aditya Agarwal and Mr.Zain Ahmed Advocate with along with appellant in person. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.A.Banerji, Advocate with respondent in person. (DHCLSC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment passed in a petition filed under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 dated 23.11.2017 by which the petition was dismissed. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 07.05.2008. Out of their wedlock, a son was born on 25.03.2009, who is in the care and custody of the respondent/wife. MAT. APP (F.C.) No.54/2018 Page 1 of 13 2. The grounds on which the divorce was sought amongst others are that soon after the marriage, the...
Tag this Judgment!Court on Its Own Motion vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 26, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 809/2018 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through: Nemo. ........ Petitioner STATE Versus Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional ..... Respondent Standing Counsel for State with Ms. Ayushi Rajput, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The legality and propriety of order of 22nd December, 2017 is under scrutiny in this petition.2. Vide aforesaid order of 22nd December, 2017, the court concerned had returned the application under Section 115(4) of Trade Mark Act to the concerned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (hereinafter referred to as ACMM) with observation that the concerned court was not the link court in the chain provided in the link roster and that there is no binding Circular whereby concerned ACMM could mark the application of his own court pending investigation, even when the link MM of concerned ACMM-01 was available.3. The background which led to passing of the afo...
Tag this Judgment!Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd & Ors. Vs.sh. Shu ...
Court: Delhi
$~22 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h February, 2019 + + + HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS. O.M.P. 235/2009 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravindra Bana and Mr. Satsheel Advocates. Sheokand, (M:9811141842 & 9990920276) versus SH. SHUSHIL KUMAR ROUT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates. (M:7275432305) AND O.M.P. 62/2012 HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravindra Bana and Mr. Satsheel Sheokand, Advocates. versus M/S AAR ESS & COMPANY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates. AND M/S AAR ESS & COMPANY THR SUSHIL KUMAR RAUT O.M.P. 311/2012 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Keshari, Mr. Apurva Bharadwaj and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Nitin Jain vs.govt. Fo Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~7 & 8 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 658/2016 & Crl.M.A. 2728/2016, 8038/2017 Decided on:-"26th February, 2019 NITIN JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Adv. versus + GOVT. FO NCT DELHI & ANR. Through: + CRL. M.C. 1968/2017 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Bikramjeet, PS Dabri. ........ Petitioner ANIL KUMAR JAIN Through: Mr. Randhir Jain, Adv. versus GOVT. FO NCT DELHI & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Bikramjeet, PS Dabri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both these petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) arise out of a criminal case relating to first information report (FIR) No.55/2011 of police station Dabri, registered at the instance of the second respondent. Since they relate to facts which are substantially common and have been pressed through the same advocate for each of thes...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjeev Kumar vs.asim Kumar
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:18. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:25. h January, 2019 + RC.REV. 357/2018 CM Appl. Nos. 30209/2018 SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Pushpendu Shukla, Advocate versus ASIM KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.P.R.Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision challenges the impugned order dated 01.12.2017 passed by the learned ACJ-CCJ-ARC(EAST), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter Trial Court) in Eviction Petition No.RC/ARC5252016 in Asim Kumar vs Sanjeev Kumar filed by the landlord/ respondent herein against the tenant/petitioner herein under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act).2. The learned Trial Court vide impugned order had dismissed the leave to defend application of the petitioner and had passed an eviction order in respect of shop No.4, Ground Floor in property bearing No.X/438, Gali No.O, Ram Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi 110031 (here...
Tag this Judgment!Shashi Ranjan Kumar vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5670/2018 SHASHI RANJAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Saakshi Agrawal, GP for Respondent No.1/UOI with Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC Law, Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI and Mr. R.N.Pareek, ASI, CRPF UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER2502.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner is an Inspector in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 10th June, 2016 passed by the Directorate General, CRPF (Respondent No.2) rejecting his prayer that his seniority should be reckoned from December, 2003 i.e. the same date on which the batchmates of the... Petitioner who participated in the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) Examination of 2002 and were appointed as Sub-Inspector (SIs), and to grant all consequential benefits accruing thereof especially the Old Pension Scheme which was applicable ...
Tag this Judgment!Piyush Gupta vs.delhi Legal Services Authority, Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 952/2018 and CM APPL. 12812/2018 PIYUSH GUPTA Through:... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sumer Sethi, Advocate with Ms Geetanjali Goel, Special Secretary, DSLSA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2502.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning a notification dated 22.12.2017 (hereafter the impugned notification) issued by the respondent (Delhi State Legal Services Authority DLSA) for empanelment as Senior Legal Services Advocates for providing legal services.2. The petitioner is an advocate practicing in Delhi. DLSA issued a notification dated 06.04.2017 inviting applications from advocates for empanelment as Legal Services Advocates for providing Legal Services in the District Courts. Pursuant to the said notification, the petitioner applied for being empanelled on Magisterial Panel in South East ...
Tag this Judgment!