Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jamia Cooperative Bank Limited vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~72 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12817/2019 and CM APPL. 52336/2019 (stay) JAMIA COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarique Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Ms. Reetika Gupta and Mr. Aamir Zaidi, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. versus Through: CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0512.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Dacchita Shahi and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advocates for R1 and R2. Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Notice. Mr. Gautam Narayan, learned ASC, accepts notice on behalf of the Government of NCT of Delhi/Respondent No.1 and the Registrar of Co- operative Societies (RCS) (Respondent No.2).2. Since the point involved is short, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is heard finally at this stage itself.3. The... Petitioner is a Co-operative Bank, as defined under Section 2 (f) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (...
Kishore Kumar vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~2, 3 and 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-"5th December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10040/2019 and CM APPL. 41542/2019, 52388/2019 M/S B.E.C. INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Rudrartti and Ms. Avani Kapoor, Kaur Advocates (M:98103. 6869). UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Prashar, GP and Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocates for UOI (M:98100. 9901). 3 + W.P.(C) 11284/2019 and CM APPL. 46493/2019 WITH30+ ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Sumant Narang, Mr. Abhiti Vacher & Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Advocates (M-8017571175). THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Sr. Examiner TM and Mr. Anil Awasthi, NIC (M- 9999285585). KISHORE KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 2325/2010 AND Through: Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Advocate (M:98115. 5888). UNION OF IN...
Ranjit Singh vs.lata Kumari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 450/2019 Date of Decision:05. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: RANJIT SINGH LATA KUMARI Through: Nemo. Versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, petitioner remained unrepresented despite a pass over. The matter is still at the admission stage.2. The present petition has been filed against the impugned order 14.11.18 whereby the Family Court, while considering the monthly income of Rs.20,000/- mentioned in the income affidavit filed by the petitioner/husband, directed him to pay ad interim maintenance @ Crl. Rev. P. 450/2019 Page 1 of 3 Rs.7,000/- per month to the respondent/wife along with further direction to pay the arrears as well as sum of Rs.8,000/- towards litigation expenses.3. In Annurita Vohra Vs. Sandeep Vohra reported as 110 (2004) DLT546 this Court has held...
State Bank of India vs.sanjay Narayan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6248/2019 STATE BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Siddharth Sangal, Adv. with Mr.Saurabh, Law Officer (SBI) versus SANJAY NARAYAN SINGH Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 41928/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.C.6248/2019 & Crl.M.A. 41927/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner prays as under: a) To allow this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and pass an appropriate order or direction thereby quashing/setting-aside the Orders dated 01.10.2019 & 23.10.2019 passed by the CRL.M.C. 6248/2019 Page 1 of 11 ASJ/Spl. Judge (NDPS), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Revision No.22 of 2019; and b) To allow this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and pass an appropriate order or direction thereby declaring that the Criminal Revision No.22 of 2019 was not m...
Meena Oberoi vs.cambridge Foundation School and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand, Adv. + WP (C) 1363/2013 MEENA OBEROI % 1. versus CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION SCHOOL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pramod Gupta, Adv. with Ms. Manogya Singh and Ms. Ankita Khanna, Advs. for R-1 and 2 Ms. Latika Choudhary, Adv. for R-3 and 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR The petitioner was appointed as Office Assistant, in the JUDGMENT0512.2019 Respondent No.1 School (hereinafter referred to as the School), on 4th July, 1991, and was confirmed, on the post, in 1993.2. Consequent on the acceptance, of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 6th CPC) by the Central Government, and the extension, thereof, to teachers, the petitioner represented, on 21st April, 2009, to the School, objecting to the fixation of her pay without extending, to her, the benefit of the said recommendations. This was followed by reminders, dated 5th May, 2009 an...
Asianet Star Communications Pvt Ltd. Vs.the Registrar of Trademarks & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~2, 3 and 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-"5th December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10040/2019 and CM APPL. 41542/2019, 52388/2019 M/S B.E.C. INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Rudrartti and Ms. Avani Kapoor, Kaur Advocates (M:98103. 6869). UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Prashar, GP and Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocates for UOI (M:98100. 9901). 3 + W.P.(C) 11284/2019 and CM APPL. 46493/2019 WITH30+ ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Sumant Narang, Mr. Abhiti Vacher & Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Advocates (M-8017571175). THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Sr. Examiner TM and Mr. Anil Awasthi, NIC (M- 9999285585). KISHORE KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 2325/2010 AND Through: Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Advocate (M:98115. 5888). UNION OF IN...
Sachin Khurana & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6253/2019 SACHIN KHURANA & ORS Through Mr.Bharat Bagga, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Balwan Singh PS Mangal Puri. Mr.Uttamjit Singh, Adv. for complainant/R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41941/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6253/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.13/2016 registered at Police Station Ashok Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.6253/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed...
Krishan Dabas vs.sapphire Cables & Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~5 & 6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 12.2019 LPA6852019, CM APPL. 47291-47294/2019 (Arising out of order dated 13.08.2019 passed in W.P. (C) 6699/2017) MAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr. Mohit Tyagi and Mr. Aman Kharb, Advs. + versus RELIANCE INTEGRATED SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. LPA6872019, CM APPL. 47646-47649/2019 (Arising out of order dated 13.08.2019 passed in W.P. (C) 6694/2017) KRISHAN DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr. Mohit Tyagi and Mr. Aman Kharb, Advs. versus M/S SAPPHIRE CABLES & SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI Through: Nemo. VIPIN SANGHI, J.(Oral):1. The two appeals have been preferred by the aforesaid appellants to assail the decisions dated 13th August, 2019 rendered by the learned Single Judge in their respective writ petitions taken note of hereinabove. Since the relevant facts, as well as...
Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors. Vs.deepika
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~41 to 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & CM APPL.22033/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners RAUT SUNITA NIVRATIRAO Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot Kaur and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 5642/2018 & CM APPL. 22036/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners BHARAT versus Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Keekshay Juneja and Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates ..... Respondent * + + + W.P.(C) 6161/2018 & CM APPL. 23830/2018 (stay) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 10 + NARESH KUMAR TANWAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Kaur Advocates W.P.(C)...
Ravi Kumar & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3482/2019 Date of decision:05. 12.2019 RAVI KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sachin Kaushik, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Jatand Veer PS Krishna Nagar. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No 1. 768/2015 dated 23.10.2015 registered at Police Station Krishna Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 3482/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 12.12.2013 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately .5. The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the interventio...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »