Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ved Parkash Khurana & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~54 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6249/2019 Date of decision:05. 12.2019 VED PARKASH KHURANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Bharat Bagga, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Balwan Singh PS Mangal Puri. Mr.Uttamjit Singh, Adv. for complainant/R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT CRL. M.A. 41929/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6249/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.640/2016 dated 26.05.2016 registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6249/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors. Vs.satyanaryan Bairwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~41 to 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & CM APPL.22033/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners RAUT SUNITA NIVRATIRAO Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot Kaur and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 5642/2018 & CM APPL. 22036/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners BHARAT versus Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Keekshay Juneja and Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates ..... Respondent * + + + W.P.(C) 6161/2018 & CM APPL. 23830/2018 (stay) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 10 + NARESH KUMAR TANWAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Kaur Advocates W.P.(C)...
Sarvinder Singh & Anr. Vs.the Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2019 CS(OS) No.633/2019, IA No.17123/2019 & IA No.17124/2019 SARVINDER SINGH & ANR. .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal, Advs. Versus THE CHIEF MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS. ...Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The two plaintiffs viz. Sarvinder Singh and Arindra Singh, have instituted this suit for (i) declaration that the notices dated 10th July, 2019, 23rd November, 2019 and the order dated 2nd November, 2019 of the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM), Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, are invalid, non est and illegal, (ii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants viz. (a) The Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank (PNB), New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, (b) Vikram Badhwar, HUF through its Karta Vikram Badhwar, and (c) Beechams Ace Mart Pvt. Ltd. from interrupting in the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs or from taking over possession ...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.r.c. Garg & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + W.P.(C) 8705/2014 ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv versus K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates NILAMANI MOHANTY Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 2262/2015 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. R.C. GARG & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0512.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates 1. Both the present petitions by the Union of India are directed against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and involve an W.P.(C) 8705/2014 & W.P.(C) 2262/2015 Page 1 of 8 identical question of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.2. While W....
Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors vs.bharat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~41 to 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & CM APPL.22033/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners RAUT SUNITA NIVRATIRAO Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot Kaur and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 5642/2018 & CM APPL. 22036/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners BHARAT versus Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Keekshay Juneja and Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates ..... Respondent * + + + W.P.(C) 6161/2018 & CM APPL. 23830/2018 (stay) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 10 + NARESH KUMAR TANWAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Kaur Advocates W.P.(C)...
Abdul Hameed & Anr vs.mohd Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2019 RC.REV. 365/2016 & CM App No.26452/2016 ABDUL HAMEED & ANR ........ Petitioners versus MOHD AHMED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Ansari with Mr. I.Ahmad, Advocates along with petitioner No1. in person. For the Respondent: Mr.Anis Ahmed with Mr.Suhail Rizwan Ahmed, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 30.01.2016 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act on the ground of bona fide necessity seeking eviction of the petitioner from one shop measuring 25.7 x 7.5 feet on the ground floor of the property bearing No.2559, Ward No.XI Bazar Tiraha Behram Khan, Daryaganj, Delhi, more RC.REV.365- 2016 Page 1...
Laxmi Devi vs.suresh Mendiratta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h December, 2019 + CM(M) 1202/2019 LAXMI DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advocate (M:98180. 4129). versus SURESH MENDIRATTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Pinki Aggarwal, Advocates along with Respondent person. (M:9999936866) in CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) REVIEW PET. 473/2019 & CM APPL. 49623/2019 1. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that there is no challenge filed by his client against the earlier orders passed by this Court on 30th October, 2019 and 5th August, 2019.2. The present review petition seeks a review of order dated 30th October, 2019, by which this Court, after hearing the ld. counsels for the parties had directed that the DNA test would be required, to establish as to whether Mr. Suresh Mendiratta @Suresh Chander Mendiratta is the son of Smt. Laxmi Devi or Smt. Geeta Devi. On the said date, the Court had also fixed the date and ...
M/S b.e.c. Industries vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~2, 3 and 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:-"5th December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10040/2019 and CM APPL. 41542/2019, 52388/2019 M/S B.E.C. INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Rudrartti and Ms. Avani Kapoor, Kaur Advocates (M:98103. 6869). UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Prashar, GP and Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocates for UOI (M:98100. 9901). 3 + W.P.(C) 11284/2019 and CM APPL. 46493/2019 WITH30+ ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Sumant Narang, Mr. Abhiti Vacher & Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Advocates (M-8017571175). THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Sr. Examiner TM and Mr. Anil Awasthi, NIC (M- 9999285585). KISHORE KUMAR ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 2325/2010 AND Through: Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Advocate (M:98115. 5888). UNION OF IN...
Man Singh vs.reliance Integrated Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~5 & 6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 12.2019 LPA6852019, CM APPL. 47291-47294/2019 (Arising out of order dated 13.08.2019 passed in W.P. (C) 6699/2017) MAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr. Mohit Tyagi and Mr. Aman Kharb, Advs. + versus RELIANCE INTEGRATED SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. LPA6872019, CM APPL. 47646-47649/2019 (Arising out of order dated 13.08.2019 passed in W.P. (C) 6694/2017) KRISHAN DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr. Mohit Tyagi and Mr. Aman Kharb, Advs. versus M/S SAPPHIRE CABLES & SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI Through: Nemo. VIPIN SANGHI, J.(Oral):1. The two appeals have been preferred by the aforesaid appellants to assail the decisions dated 13th August, 2019 rendered by the learned Single Judge in their respective writ petitions taken note of hereinabove. Since the relevant facts, as well as...
Prerna Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 2601/2019 PRERNA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Prashant with Mr. Prithvi Raj, STATE Advs. versus Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State SI Parnesh Lamba, PS South Campus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner in criminal case No.58944/2016 and FIR No.520/2015 dated 10.09.2015 under section 3 of The Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007 before the learned CMM, Patiala House Court, New Delhi.2. It is not in dispute that the complainant and the IO in the present case is the same officer and as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that complainant has investigated the case and if he makes deposition before the Crl.M.C.2601/2019 Page 1 of 4 court then the conviction will be in his credit. However, the co...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »