Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs.dr. Rajendra Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8687/2017 and CM APPL. 35657/2017 (stay) UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Advocate. versus DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0612.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present petition by the Union of India is directed against an order dated 6th February, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi disposing of OA No.456 of 2014 filed by the Respondent and directing that he should be granted Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) with effect from 23rd January, 2007 i.e. the date when his juniors were so promoted, ignoring the two Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for the years ending in March 2001 and March 2003. The Respondent was held entitled to all consequential benefits. The said impugned order was to be complied with within 3 months.2. This is the 7th round of litigation ...
Rattan Mehta & Ors. Vs.gayatri Shah & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h December, 2019 + CM (M) 1738/2019 RATTAN MEHTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. G.P. Thareja & Ms. Shalini (M- Advocates Gandharva, 9811123833) versus GAYATRI SHAH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora & Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates. (M-9811006760) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 1st August, 2019, by which the Plaintiffs/Respondents (hereinafter, Plaintiffs) application under Order XI Rule 1 CPC has been allowed by the ld. ADJ.2. The petition arises out of a suit for possession, mesne profits and damages in respect of a shop located in property bearing No.25-A, C-Block, Vasant Vihar Market (local shopping Centre-I), New Delhi (hereinafter, suit property), filed by Smt. Preeti Shah and Smt. Santosh Shah against various Defendants who are part of the same family and one M/s Mahima Caps...
Sh. Arun Vats vs.ms. Pallavi Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * CRL.REV.P. 751/2018 IN THE MATTER OF: CRL.REV.P. 751/2018 Reserved on Decision on :02. 12.20 06.12.2019 ........ Petitioner SH. ARUN VATS Through: Mr. S.C. Vats, Advocate. versus MS. PALLAVI SHARMA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate along CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI with R-1 in person. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order 1. dated 05.07.2018 passed by the Family Court in MT No.696/2016 whereby in the respondents petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., an interim maintenance of Rs.33,005/- per month was granted to the respondent/wife and the minor child.2. In the aforesaid petition, it is the case of respondent/wife that she was thrown out of her matrimonial house and was with her mother at her parental home along with her minor child. It was also stated that she had no source of income and claimed Rs.80,000/- per month as maintenance. CRL.REV.P. 751/2018 Page 1 of 4 3. It w...
Sunil Kumar & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6240/2019 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. L.P. Singh and Mr. Raj Chaudhary, Advs. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State ASI Anil Kumar/ IO, PS-Kanjhawala Ms. Seema Gulati, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41907/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6240/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.876/2015 dated 30.12.2015 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6240/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 2...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors. Vs.naresh Kumar Tanwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~41 to 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & CM APPL.22033/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners RAUT SUNITA NIVRATIRAO Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot Kaur and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 5642/2018 & CM APPL. 22036/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners BHARAT versus Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Keekshay Juneja and Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates ..... Respondent * + + + W.P.(C) 6161/2018 & CM APPL. 23830/2018 (stay) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 10 + NARESH KUMAR TANWAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Kaur Advocates W.P.(C)...
M/S Chet Ram Sanjay Kumar vs.rajender Prakash Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2019 RC.REV. 104/2017 & CM APP Nos.8481/2017, 10904/2018 M/S CHET RAM SANJAY KUMAR RAJENDER PRAKASH GUPTA versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Ms. Vidhi Nigam and Mr.Vipual Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Lalit Gupta, Mr.Siddharth and Mr.Sachin Jain, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns orders dated 01.04.2016 as also order dated 25.01.2017. By order dated 01.04.2016, the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed. By order dated 25.01.2017, review petition filed by the petitioner seeking review of order dated 01.04.2016 has also dismissed.2. Respondent has filed the subject eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereina...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.nilamani Mohanty
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + W.P.(C) 8705/2014 ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv versus K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates NILAMANI MOHANTY Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 2262/2015 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. R.C. GARG & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0512.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates 1. Both the present petitions by the Union of India are directed against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and involve an W.P.(C) 8705/2014 & W.P.(C) 2262/2015 Page 1 of 8 identical question of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.2. While W....
Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors vs.raut Sunita Nivratirao
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~41 to 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & CM APPL.22033/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate versus ........ Petitioners RAUT SUNITA NIVRATIRAO Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot Kaur and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 5642/2018 & CM APPL. 22036/2018 (stay) GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners BHARAT versus Through Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Keekshay Juneja and Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates ..... Respondent * + + + W.P.(C) 6161/2018 & CM APPL. 23830/2018 (stay) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus W.P.(C) 5640/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 10 + NARESH KUMAR TANWAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Prabhjot and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Kaur Advocates W.P.(C)...
Sita Ram vs.sanam Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 614/2019 & CM APPL. 47460/2019 Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2019 SITA RAM versus SANAM AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Baloni, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Brij Bhushan Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Lalit Gupta and Mr. Siddharth Awana, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 47459/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CAV. 1087/2019 Since learned counsel for the respondent/caveator has entered appearance, caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 614/2019 & 47458/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 01.05.2019, whereby the Leave RC.REV.614/2019 Page 1 of 3 to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of...
Rajesh Anand vs.rahul Wadhwani & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2019 CM (M) 1375/2018 & CM APPL. 46175/2019 RAJESH ANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma & Mr. Yugant Kuhar, Advocates (M-9999989082) RAHUL WADHWANI & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr. Sachin Sangwan, Mr. Sachin Choudhary & Mr. V.P. Singh, Advocates (M- 9811164628) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff/Petitioner (hereinafter, Plaintiff) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 1st June, 2018, by which the ld. ADJ has dismissed the application under Order XV-A CPC.2. The case of the Plaintiff is that he is the owner of shop bearing No.6 (private No.6A), adjoining Shop No.5, Central Market, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi - 110024 (hereinafter, suit property). The Plaintiff claims to have purchased the suit property from one Ms. Pushpa Kapoor vide registered sale deed dated 7th September, 2015. A copy of the registered sale deed h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »