Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6301/2019 Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: RAVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Advocate Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Dheer Singh, P.S. Farsh Bazar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 42084/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6301/2019 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking setting aside/recall of the impugned order dated 12.02.2019 passed by the learned ASJ/Special Judge (NDPS), Karkardooma Courts, whereby the petitioners application to recall the witness Chetan Sharma (PW-6) for cross examination in FIR No.183/2011 under Section 307 IPC & Sections 25/25(54)/59/307 of Arms Act, 1959 P.S. Farsh Bazar, Delhi was dismissed. CRL.M.C. 6301/2019 Page 1 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitione...
Asha Kumari vs.technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Counc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 W.P.(C) 2576/2017 & CM APPL. 11122/2017 ASHA KUMARI Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Ms. Shweta Kapoor and Ms. Priya Pande, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION FORECASTING AND ASSESSMENT COUNCIL (TIFAC) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant petition, the petitioner, in effect, seeks issuance of a writ of Mandamus for being regularized to the post of Hindi typist with the respondent-Technology Information Forecasting And Assessment Council in short, TIFAC. The facts emerging from the record are that 2. the committee of Parliament on Official Language recommended 27 items of work to be done in Hindi by TIFAC. At that point of time, there was no Hindi typist in It resulted into TIFAC undertaking a process for selection for the TIFAC. W.P.(C.) No.2576/2017 Page 1 of 13 typist w.e.f. 18.05.2006....
Mahesh Pal & Anr vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6297/2019 Through Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus MAHESH PAL & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Respondent no.2 in person W/SI Sangeeta, PS Seempuri Crl. M.A. 42070/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6297/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.353/2016 dated 08.03.2016 registered at Police Station Seema Puri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6297/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.02.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born o...
Sanjay Grover & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3227/2019 Date of decision:06. 12.2019 SANJAY GROVER & ANR. STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. versus Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State Mr. Ashish, Adv. for R-2. ASI Suresh PS Bindapur. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.937/2017 dated 21.12.2017 registered at Police Station Binda Pur and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 29.11.2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely Crl.M.C. 3227/2019 Page 1 of 2 Yug. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and responden...
Gopal Chawla vs.yogita Saxena @ Pooja Chawla & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 924/2019 Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GOPAL CHAWLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Banerjee and Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocates. YOGITA SAXENA @ POOJA CHAWLA & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Versus Through: Mr.(appearance not given), Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order dated 30.05.2019 passed by Judge, Family Court, Shahdara District, Delhi wherein the Court granted maintenance of Rs.8000/- to the respondents (Rs.5000/- to Respondent no.1 and Rs.3000/- to Respondent no.2) 2. The marriage between the petitioner and Respondent No.1 was solemnized in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 09.07.2011. A daughter namely Dipanshi (Respondent No.2) was born out of the said wedlock on 11.07.2013. However, due to difference between the parties, Crl. Rev. P. 924/2019 Page 1 of 3 ...
Schloss Chanakya Private Limited vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6270/2019 SCHLOSS CHANAKYA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K R Chawla, Mr. Vijay Chawla, Mr. Prashant Mehta & Mr, Dhruv, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State SI Kishore, PS Sarojini Nagar Mr. Prateek Kumar and Mr. Sunil Sehgal, Advocates for R-2 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL MA419962019 (exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6270/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing the FIR No.97/2018 dated 11.08.2018 registered at Police Station- CRL.M.C. 6270/2019 Page 1 of 5 Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 338/304A IPC and the proceedings emanating therefrom.4. The present petition has been filed on the ground that petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 6 have already...
Bijender Singh Lather vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 3023/2019 BIJENDER SINGH LATHER ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Siddhartha Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jasbir Malik, Mr.Shantanu Sharma & Mr.Neeraj Khapra, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. SI Kamal Kohli PS EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 42063/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Bail Appln.3023/2019 & Crl.M.A. 42062/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to grant anticipatory bail to the... Petitioner in FIR No.59 of 2019 dated 04.04.2019 Police Station, Economic Offences Wing, Mandir Marg, New Delhi under Sections 406, 420 & 120-B of IPC. Bail Appln.3023/2019 Page 1 of 10 4. The brief facts leading to filing of the said petition are that Prabhu Shanti Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Company"), a priva...
Consortium of Siemens Ltd. India, Siemens Sa Spain and Siemens Ag Germ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~31, 34 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 + W.P.(C) 12857/2019 CONSORTIUM OF SIEMENS LTD. INDIA, SIEMENS SA SPAIN AND SIEMENS AG GERMANY & ORS.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Bhavna Mishra, Advocate. versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG with Mr. Jitender Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Advocate and Ms. Saurabh Sharma, for respondent No.1. Mr. Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh, Advocate and Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2. Advocate Singh, Jagjit + W.P.(C) 12868/2019 CONSORTIUM OF SIEMENS LTD. INDIA, SIEMENS SA SPAIN AND SIEMENS AG GERMANY & ORS.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Advocate, Mr. WPC12857/2019, 12868/...
Balram Meena vs.railway Protection Force and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h November, 2019 Decided on:6. h December, 2019 WP(C) 10240/2017 BALRAM MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal with Ms. T.Banerjee and Mr.Manu Kharra, Advocates. RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND ANR. versus Through: Mr.Jitendra .....Respondents Standing Counsel with Mr.Amit Kumar and Mr.Saurav Sharma, Advocates. K.Singh, CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner challenges an order dated 22nd August, 2017 passed by the Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force (RPF) terminating his services as Constable.2. This is the third round of litigation.3. Pursuant to an advertisement issued in 2011 the... Petitioner applied for the post of Constable. He was duly called for in the selection and was appointed as Constable by a letter dated 1st October, 2014. By an order dated 15th June, W.P.(C) 10240/2017 Page 1 of 5 2015 his selection stood cancelled on the grou...
Sathiyapriya & Anr vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2019
$~56 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 4862/2019 & CRL.M.A. 36811/2019 CRL.M.A. 36813/2019 SATHIYAPRIYA & ANR. Through Adv. (appearance not given) ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Vijay Pal, North Avenue Respondent nos.2&3 in person ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seeks quashing of FIR1 09/2018 dated 26.03.2018 and Final Report No.SC. 260/2019 dated 13.2.2019 u/s 12 of the POCSO Act and the proceedings arising out of the said FIR pending in the Court of Ld. ASJ ( POCSO Act), Patiala House Court, New Delhi against the... Petitioners and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4862/2019 Page 1 of 4 2.3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. Learned couns...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »