Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hemant Kumar Singhal vs.indian Overseas Bank & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2019 + CM(M) 1457/2019 and CM APPL. 44339/2019, 44340/2019 HEMANT KUMAR SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Gautam, Advocate (M:98182. 3060). versus INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prem Chhetri, Mr. Promod Kumar and Ms. Sebika Lama, Advocates (M:79085. 7433). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) 1. The... Petitioner/Defendant No.2 - Mr. Hemant Kumar Singhal (hereinafter Defendant No.2) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17th August, 2019 passed by the ld. ADJ allowing the application under Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC for leading evidence in rebuttal and evidence of an expert witness.2. The Respondent No.1/Plaintiff - Indian Overseas Bank (hereinafter Bank) filed a suit for recovery of Rs.5,71,920/- along with interest against Respondent No.2/Defendant No.1 - Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain who had allegedly taken a loan vide application dated 2nd March, ...
Mohit Ahlawat vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10769/2017 MOHIT AHLAWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0912.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who has been medically boarded out of the Border Security Force (BSF), on account of being found permanently unfit, has approached this Court seeking two reliefs. The first is for a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to grant him extraordinary pension or disability pension and the second is for grant of ex-gratia compensation.2. The facts in brief are that the... Petitioner joined the Armed Force Headquarters, Ministry of Defence as Lower Division Clerk (LDC) on compassionate grounds on 16th October, 2009. While working as such, he applied for the post of Assistant Commandant in the Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) through the Union Public Service Commiss...
Rakesh Kumar Solanki vs.raj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2019 + CM(M) 1148/2019 & CM APPL. 34830/2019 RAKESH KUMAR SOLANKI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate for R (M:9818582376) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr. Sachin Nawani Advocates for R-4. (M:9910770311) Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, SC for DDA with Mr. Nazia Parveen, Advocate. (M:9278693021) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) 1. Ld. Counsels for the parties have been heard. It is submitted that Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are ex-parte before the Trial Court.2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 1st April, 2019 by which the witnesses of the... Petitioner/Defendant No.6 were not permitted to be examined and the evidence of... Petitioner was closed by the Trial Court. The submission of ld. counsel for the... Petitioner is that on the earlier occasion, vide order dat...
Unibros vs.all India Radio & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:9. December, 2019 Judgment reserved on:22. d November, 2019 FAO(OS) 229/2010 UNIBROS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jagdish Vatsa, Advocate. Versus ALL INDIA RADIO & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri and Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates for respondent no.1 Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against the judgment dated 25.02.2010 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which objections filed by respondent No.1 to the Award dated 15.07.2002 have been allowed, and also costs of Rs.50,000/- have been granted in favour of respondent No.1.2. Some necessary facts required to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal are that the parties e...
Subhash Gulati vs.harish Kumar Sethi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 691/2019 & CAV. 1210/2019 Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2019 SUBHASH GULATI ... Petitioner HARISH KUMAR SETHI ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kunal Mada, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr.Neeraj Yadav and Mr.Siddharth Arora, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APP No.52918/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 691/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 17.09.2019 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed and an eviction order passed.2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that the proceedings were listed on 02.09.2019 before the Rent Controller, RC.REV. 691/2019 Page 1 of 3 when the arguments on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC were heard and thereafter, the matter was adjourned to 17.09.2019 for orders/clari...
Nikhil Saxena vs.state (n.c.t of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1244/2018 NIKHIL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jai Khanduja, Advocate. versus STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. CRL.A. 1249/2018 WITH VISHAL SONKAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. AND CRL.A. 95/2019 PUNIT @ RAJU Through Mr. Sahil Talwar, Advocate with Mr. Chander Kant and Mr. Nikhil Garg, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus CRL. A. Nos.1244/2018, 1249/2018, 95/2019 Page 1 of 33 THE STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. % Reserved On :02. d November, 2019 Date of Decision:09. h December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE...
Micromax Informatics Limited vs.shivi Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~A-43 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h Decemeber, 2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 504/2019 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Nishant Arora, Advocate. versus SHIVI ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anukul Raj, Mrs. Nikita Raj and Ms. Priscilla Ghales, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. Nos. 17276-77/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 504/2019 1.2. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance on advance copy and accepts notice.3. Present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award.4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 504/2019 Page 1 of 2 5.6. Arbitration Clause in the Contract Agreement was inv...
Bajrang Vats vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 12.2019 + W.P.(C) No.12966/2019 BAJRANG VATS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Bajrang Vats, petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr.Aaryan Verma, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Naman Jain, Adv. for Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 5. Insp.Pharlad Singh, SHO, PS Barakhamba Road. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) ORDER1 This public interest litigation has been preferred for the following prayers:-"a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/directions to the... RESPONDENTS to shift the protestors from Mandi House Periphery to other suitable place immediately and Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/directions to the... RESPONDENTS to open the Sikandra Road (One-way from ITO to Mandi b) WP(C) No.12966/2019 Page 1 of 2 c) House Periphery) and Bhagwan Dass Road (Two-way from red l...
Smt. Bharati Sharma vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 09, 2019 + TEST.CAS. 84/2018 SMT. BHARATI SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bakshi, Mr.Abhishek Mohan and Mr. Amitesh Singh Bakshi, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anya Singh, Adv. for R-1 / State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 276 of India Succession Act, with the following prayers:-"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may most graciously be pleased to: a) Grant in favour of the... Petitioner, Letters of Administration, with the WILL dated 30.12.2013 annexed thereto, in respect of the estate of the deceased, namely Smt. Susheela Ambike; a) Pass any other order in favour of the... Petitioner as is deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court. 2. In substance, the petitioner is seeking Letters of Administration, with the WILL dated Decembe...
Jayant Ghadia vs.hindustan Tradex & Manufacturing Pvt Ltd and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 10.04.2019 Judgement pronounced on 09.12.2019 + EXECUTION PETITION No.79/2014 & EXECUTION APPLICATION (OS) Nos. 833/2015, 837/2015, 1122/2015, 167/2016, 68/2017 & 363/2017 JAYANT GHADIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain & Mr. Siddhant Nath, Advocates. versus HINDUSTAN TRADEX & MANUFACTURING PVT LTD AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, with Mr. Senior Advocate Shohit Chaudhry, Advocate, for judgment debtor No.1 Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocate, for objector Kuldeep Singh Dalal. Ms. Kajal Chandra with Ms. Prerna Chopra, Advocates, for Objector Ms. Amna Bi. Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Mr. Mrinal Srivastava, Advocates, for objector VP Gupta. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface 1. Principally I have been called upon to adjudicate upon Ex. P. 79/2014 (in short Execution petition). This execution petition has been filed by one Mr. Jayant Ghadia (in short, Ghadia). Ghadia h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »