Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 02 2019

Shri Sandeep Dahiya vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12643/2019 SHRI SANDEEP DAHIYA ........ Petitioner and Singh Through Mr. Abhishek Mr.Abhist, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shashi Gupta and Mr. Mayank Ahuja, Adv. for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER0212.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This public interest litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction to the Respondent No.1, for taking action against the Commercial properties bearing Plot No.WZ-671, Main Market, Rishi Nagar, Rani Bagh, DeIhi- 110034, Plot No.861, Rani Bagh, Delhi 110034, Plot No.1484, Rani Bagh, Delhi-110034, Plot No.320, Rishi Nagar, Rani Bagh, Delhi 110034, Plot No.936, Rishi Nagar, Rani W.P.(C) 12643/2019 Page 1 of 3 Bagh, Delhi 110034, Plot No.3381...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Rahul Dev Mandal @ Rahul vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1117/2015 Judgment Reserved :18. 11.2019 Date of Decision :02. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF RAHUL DEV MANDAL @ RAHUL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram and Mr.Avinash, Advocates. STATE Versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The appellant has instituted the present appeal assailing the judgment of conviction dated 01.06.2015 and order on sentence dated 06.06.2015, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.201/2013, registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and 4 POCSO Act, 2012 P.S. Chankyapuri whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, 2012 and was sentenced to undergo RI10years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 376 IPC, in default whereof to undergo SI for 8 months.2. The brief facts as noted by the trial court are reproduced herein below:-"CRL.A. 1117/2015 Page 1 of 9 2. The facts in brief ar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Shree Vijay Shanti Suri Education Trust & Anr. Vs.arun Kumar Purohit & ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CONT.CAS(C) 1042/2019 Date of decision:2. 12.2019 SHREE VIJAY SHANTI SURI EDUCATION TRUST & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Devyani Ashna, Mr. Kunal Gosain and Ms. Pallavi Mohan, Advs.1. versus ARUN KUMAR PUROHIT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Ms. Sanjna Dua and Mr. Tushar Mathur, Advs. for R-2. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave and Mr. Kumar Prashant, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Addl. Adv. General with Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): The captioned contempt petition is pivoted on the alleged breach and/or non-compliance of the order dated 23.10.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.10840/2019 and CM No.44879/2019. CONT.CAS(C) No.1042/2019 Page 1 of 14 Background:-"2. For disposal of this contempt petition, the following broad facts are required to be noticed:2. 1.... Petitio...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Ateet Bansal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:2. d December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6266/20 1. ATEET BANSAL Versus Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Sr. Govt. Counsel for R-1, 3, 4 & 5 Mr. Vipul Pankaj Sanghi, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Amit Bansal, Ms. Seema Dolo & Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advs. for R-8 & R-9. Ms. Survehi Suri, Adv. for R-10 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT This so-called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (i) issue writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent No.1 Union of India to make present "National Career Service" portal proper, functional, comprehensive portal for advertisement to all central government, state governments and other instrumentalities of State recruitments. All Government jobs and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Union of India vs.vinod Ashwini Saxena & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h November, 2019 Decided on:2. d December, 2019 W.P. (C) 5954/2016 & CM245362016 (stay) UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus VINOD ASHWINI SAXENA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ajay Kumar Tandon, Ms Purnima Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr Sudhir Walia and Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-2. Mr Dewesh Singh and Mr Sukriti Ghai, Advocates for R-3. W.P. (C) 1206/2017 & CM54922017 (stay) + SIDHARTH ZUTSHI UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr Devesh Singh, Ms Sukriti Ghar versus and Mr Rahul Adhana, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI. Mr Ajay Kumar Tandon and Ms Purnima Singh, Advocates for R-2. Mr Sudhir Walia and Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P. (C) Nos. 5954/2016 & 1206/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

The State vs.gaurav @ Mohit & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

11 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 659/2019 THE STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State ........ Petitioner versus with Insp., PS Jafrabad. GAURAV @ MOHIT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. Date of Decision:02. d December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CRL. M.A. 41606/2019 (condonation of delay) Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the delay of nineteen days in filing the criminal leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 41607/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. Page 1 of 7 CRL. L.P. 659/2019 CRL.L.P. 659/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment dated 9th August, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge05 (Shahdara District), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi acquitting the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Kalpana Mehdiratta vs.air Force Bal Bharati School & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 597/2017 % 1. KALPANA MEHDIRATTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S, Mr. Praveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey and Mr. Ram Singh, Advs. versus AIR FORCE BAL BHARATI SCHOOL & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv, Mr. Sachin Dutta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Adv. for R- 1, 2, 3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0212.2019 The petitioner Kalpana Mehdiratta challenges, by means of this writ petition, the selection and appointment of Respondent No.6 Ms. Mani Shankra, as Vice-Principal of the Respondent No.1-School (hereinafter referred to as the School) by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) which met, for the said purpose, on 26th June, 2015. She also prays that she be promoted as Vice-Principal, in place of Respondent No.6, with effect from the date of promotion of Respondent No.6, i.e. 1st July, 2015. WP (C) 597/2017 Page 1 of 40 Facts 2. The petitioner was appoint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Rolls-Royce Plc vs.deputy Director of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2019

$~29, 30, 32, 43 & 44 * + + + + + Date of Decision:02. 12.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA9692019 ITA9702019 ITA9722019 ITA9732019 ITA9742019 ROLLS-ROYCE PLC ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Percival Billimoria, Mr.SR Patnaik, Mr.Thangadurai VP and Mr.Sidharth Thakur, Advocates versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Lakshmit Gurung, Senior Standing Cousnel with Mr.Talha A Rahman, Mr.Siddharth Gupta and Mr. Shaz Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(Oral):1. The present appeal is preferred by the assessee against the common order passed by the Income Tax Tribunal Delhi Bench I-2 New Delhi dated 28th May, 2019, in several ITAs preferred before it, pertaining to the assessment years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2009-10. The Tribunal has rejected the said appeals preferred by the appellant, inter alia, on the premise that this Cour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019