Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
University of Delhi vs.praveen Sagar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:28. 11.2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + LPA7292019 & C.M. Applns.50303-50304/2019 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mahinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Koushik Ghosh, Ms. Manisha Relia, Advocates Versus PRAVEEN SAGAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sahil Garg, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra and Ms. Mansi Khanna, Advocates + LPA7342019 & C.M. Appls.50516-50517/2019 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Mr. Koushik Ghosh, Ms. Manisha Relia, Advocates Versus UMANG BHARDWAJ ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sahil Garg, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra and Ms. Mansi Khanna, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. The appellant/University of Delhi has filed two intra-court appeals being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 08.11.2019 whereby, it has been directed to grant admission to Praveen Sagar [respondent in LPA LPA7292019 & 734/2019 Page 1 of 13 729/2019 arisi...
Rohinton Edalji vs.arvind Rai & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ROHINTON EDALJI CM(M) 1307/2018 Date of decision:3. d December, 2019. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Raveesh Thukral & Mr. Shubham Mahajan, Advocates (M-9810166390) $~41 * + ARVIND RAI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Sharma, Mr. Arun Baali & Mr. (M- Siddharth Yadav, Advocates 9999315171) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 13th August, 2018, by which the... Petitioners application under Section 195 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for appointment of a Curator, was rejected by the ld. Trial Court.2. The background of the present proceedings is that one Ms. Piroja Edalji and Mr. Hoshang Edalji were 50% owners of property bearing No.213 (lower ground floor), Kailash Hills, New Delhi - 110065 (hereinafter, suit property). Ms. Piroja Edalji passed away on 19th December, 2012, leaving behind two daughters and two sons. The... Pe...
Infosys Ltd. Vs.software Technology Parks of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~A-30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 493/2019 INFOSYS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Syal, Advocate versus SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY PARKS OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Kishore, Ms. Reha Mall & Mr. Niraj Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 16966/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 493/2019 & I.A. 16967/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Ravi Kishore, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. Present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 493/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. A Sole Arbitrator was appointed on 22.03.2018 to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. Appointment of the Arbit...
Satish Kumar vs.the District & Sessions Judge (Hqs)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-03.12.2019 + W.P.(C) 12066/2019 SATISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.S.Sastry, Adv. versus THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE (HQS) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat with Mr.Nitesh Singh &Ms.PalakRohmetra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) C.M.No.49398/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12066/2019 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by an ex-employee in the Office of the District and Sessions Judge, Delhi assailing the order dated 17.06.2017 passed by the Disciplinary Authority dismissing him from service, as also the order dated 01.11.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereunder his appeal challenging this dismissal came to be rejected. W.P.(C) 12066/2019 Page 1 of 6 2. The petitioner, who was appointed to the post of a peon ...
P. N. Tiwari vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7327/2018 Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS P. N. TIWARI $~26 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % versus ORDER0312.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Aggrieved by the non-expunction of the adverse remarks in his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the period between 1st April, 2015 and 31st March, 2016, the... Petitioner who is an Assistant Commandant in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has filed the present petition. He also challenges the rejection of his representations against the adverse remarks by the orders dated 1st March, 2017, 1st May, 2017 and 31st August, 2017.2. The... Petitioner joined the CRPF as Sub-Inspector on 21st October, 1993. He was promoted as Inspector on 17th January, 2003. The... Petitioner states that his performance has consistently been assessed as very good by his superior off...
Vipin vs.bhavna Rajput
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:08. 11.2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + MAT. APP. (F.C.) 293/2019 & CM APPLs. 48509-510/2019 .....Appellant VIPIN Through: Mr. Anurag Rawat and Ms. versus Meenakshi, Advocates BHAVNA RAJPUT Through: None .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband being aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Family Court dated 31.08.2019, whereby it has dismissed his petition seeking divorce from the respondent/wife on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short, the Act).2. The facts, as set out for the purposes of deciding this appeal, are that the parties had got married at Faridabad, Haryana on 20.11.2013, as per the Hindu rites and customs. The parties resided together at the matrimonial home i.e. premises No.E-284, Dakshinpuri, New Delhi whereafter they had shifted to a rented a...
Vesta Holding Private Limited & Anr vs.akm Enterprises Private Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d December, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 CS(OS) 1020/2009 & IA No.386/2019 (u/O VIII R-1A(3) CPC) VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. Versus AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. AND + CS(OS) 1016/2010 & IA No.389/2019 (u/O VII R-14 CPC) AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. Versus VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CS(OS) No.1020/2009, as per amended plaint dated 22nd October, 2011, is filed for recovery of Rs.28,12,50,000/- along with pendente...
Sh. Sunil Kumar Kharwar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 SH. SUNIL KUMAR KHARWAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arun K. Srivastava with Mr. Anil Jaryal, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Sandeep, PS Punjabi Bagh SI Mohinder Singh, PS Viaks Puri Mr. Rohit Sehgal, Adv. for R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 41689/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.28/2018 dated 13.01.2018 registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1...
sh.aman Kaushik & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 03, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2406/2019 SH. AMAN KAUSHIK & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Charu Chaudhary, Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State with SI Radha Sharma Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) Crl.M.A. 41737/2019... Petitioners are seeking preponment of hearing in the main petition on the ground that subject matter of dispute inter se parties stands amicably resolved between the parties and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Notice. Ms. Charu Chaudhary, Advocate appearing for Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State, accepts notice. W.P.(CRL) 2406/2019 1 Heard. The application is allowed and the main petition is taken up for ...
Raj Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : November 01, 2019 Decided on : December 03, 2019 Crl. Appeal No.187/2018 RAJ KUMAR STATE .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sharad Malhotra, Adv. for DHCLSC. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Ram Vilas, PS Pahar Ganj. Mr. Sarfraz Khan, Adv. for DSLSA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 This criminal appeal assailing conviction on charge of rape, notwithstanding the testimony of the prosecutrix conceding the relationship to be consensual, has led to revelation of a pattern of irresponsible exercise of jurisdiction vis--vis victim compensation scheme necessitating measures to be taken so as to curb misuse of public money.2. The appellant was brought to trial in the court of Sessions (case no.28940/2016) in the wake of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) dated 23.08.2016 submitted by the Station House Officer (SHO) of police stat...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »