Delhi Court December 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shubham Bansal vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 10.2019 Pronounced on:04. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 2024/2018& Crl. M.A. 7164/2018, 7786/2018, 7787/2018 & 28577/2018 SHUBHAM BANSAL Through Mr.S.C. Buttan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. SI Sandeep Crime Branch R.K. Puram. Mr. J.M. Kalia, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the observations of the learned Court passed in application under section 173(8) Cr.P.C. in FIR No.130/2012 in case titled State vs. Shubham Kansal.2. Further seeks direction thereby setting aside order dated 04.01.2017 passed in Criminal Revision No.138/2016 and restore order dated CRL.M.C.2024/2018 Page 1 of 16 26.02.2016 passed by learned CMM whereby proceedings under Section 66A, IT Act and Section 509 IPC against the petitioner h...
Avtar Singh Arora vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI AVTAR SINGH ARORA Reserved on:25. h November, 2019 Decided on:4. h December, 2019 W.P.(C) 13147/2018 .Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who is an Additional Director General (Electrical & Mechanical) [ADG (E&M)]. in the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), has filed the present petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 22nd November, 2018 in OA No.2350/ 2018, filed by the... Petitioner. Respondent No.1 is the Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Respondent No.2 is the W.P.(C) 13147/2018 Page 1 of 18 Director General, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs and Respondent No.3 is the Union Public Services Commission (UPSC).2. By the abo...
M/S Techno Power Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Collateral Manageme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~A-16 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 89/2019 & I.A. 14559/2019 M/S TECHNO POWER ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuman Sharma and Mr. Vishesh Dhundia, Advocates versus NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD. (NCML) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra and Mr. Sudhanshu Sikka, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. An Arbitration Agreement dated 20.04.2014 was entered into between the parties which reads as under:-"38. Arbitration (a) In the event of any dispute or controversy between the Parties to this agreement in connection with the rights and obligation hereunder, the parties shall first endeavour to co- operate to resolve the dispute or controversy by mutual consultation and agreement. (b) In the event that the dispute or event is not resolved by mutual consultation, the same shall be referred of Arbitration. Both parties shall agree for...
M/S Shriram Distribution Services Pvt Ltd vs.m/s a N Traders Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:22. d November, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:4. December, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 293/2018 M/S SHRIRAM DISTRIBUTION SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ashish Bhagat, Mr. Tanmeet Singh &Mr. Ritik Malik, Advocates versus M/S A N TRADERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashim Vachher & Mr. Vaibhav Dabas, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal, filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (hereinafter the Act) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, is directed against the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in O.M.P. (COMM) 169/2018, by which the learned Single Judge has set aside the arbitral award dated 11.01.2018.2. Brief facts required to be considered for disposal of this appeal are th...
Nitya Nand Sinha vs.m/s Hl Promoters Private Limited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. h December, 2019 W.P.(C) 9843/2018 NITYA NAND SINHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bankey Bihari, Mr. Birendra Bikram, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus M/S HL PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate with Mr. Saifur R. Faridi and Ms. Cassandra Zosangliani, Advocates for R1. Ms. Barnali Basak, Advocate for R2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31st May, 2018 whereby 1. the learned Labour Court rejected the statement of claim of the petitioner.2. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute against the respondents on the averments that he was in the permanent and continuous employment of the respondent since 01st December, 2014; he was designated as a General Manager but he never performed managerial, supervisory and administrative nature of duties during his tenure; the primary, basi...
Roshan Lal vs.ram Nath Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + CM (M) 856/2016 & CM APPL. 31978/2016 ROSHAN LAL Through: Mr. P. S. Sharda and Mr. Kshitij ........ Petitioner versus Sharda, Advocates. (M:9810077120) RAM NATH GARG ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Runjita Das and Mr. Vishal Mehar, Advocates. (M:9953738402) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 29th July, 2016 by which three applications, filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff), have been disposed of by the Ld. Civil Judge. The main contest is in respect of the application seeking appointment of a Local Commissioner and the application for leading additional evidence.2. The dispute arises out of a suit for possession filed by the Plaintiff Shri Ram Nath Garg. The case of the Plaintiff is that he is the owner of the property bearing no.4/47, forming part of property No.605, area measuring...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.delhi Jal Board & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2019
$~16 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3796/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Devanshu Lahiny, Adv. for respondent No.1 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Dacchita Shahi and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. for GNCTD Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for respondent nos. 6 and 7 Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. G.S. Oberoi, Ms. Parul Panthi, Mr. Anant Nigam and Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advs. for DDA Ms. Garima Prashad, Standing Counsel for SDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER0412.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been initiated by this Court suo motu looking to the public interest in connection with improving the status of depleting W.P.(C) 3796/2019 Page 1 of 8 of ground water condition in NCT of Delhi through rain water harvesting fo...
Enarch Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lalji Superspeciality Hospital & Resea ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~A-22 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 456/2019 ENARCH CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Seth, Advocate. versus LALJI SUPERSPECIALITY HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE GORAKHPUR PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Taneja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.15876/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 456/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Rakesh Taneja, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent has no O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 456/2019 Page 1 of 2 objection to the time being extended for comple...
Jinender Kumar vs.chander Shekhar Lodhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 526/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2019 JINENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus CHANDER SHEKHAR LODHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Amit Punj, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Sajid Chaudhary with Mr. Arshad Ali, Mr. Rashid Hasan, Advocates for respondent No.1 with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 526/2019 & CM APPL.39973/2019 (stay) 1.2. Respondent Nos.2(a) to 2(c) have been unserved. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.2 was also the respondent No.2 before the Rent Controller and he did not file leave to defend application and he has not even impugned the eviction order.3. Service of respondent No.2(a) to 2(c) is, accordingly, dispensed RC.REV. 526/2019 Page 1 of 3 with.4.... Petitioner impugns order dated 08.05.2019, whereby the leave to def...
Gini & Jony Ltd vs.creons Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:03. d December, 2019 + RFA9422019, CM APPL Nos.47531/2019, 47533/2019 GINI & JONY LTD ..... Appellant P Pal, Through : Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr.Amit Mr.Ajay Deshpande, Advocates. versus CREONS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through : Mr.Naresh K.Daksh, Advocate YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 10.05.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge- 03/South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.10261/2016 (old No.1945/2009) whereby the suit of the respondent for recovery of Rs.67,13,124/- was decreed against appellant to the extent of Rs.44,04,937/- with costs and simple interest @ 10% pa from date of filing of suit till realization.2. a) The brief facts are:-"the appellant company is incorporated under the Companies Act,...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »