Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Virender Singh Chankot vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~17 * + W.P.(C) 4450/2017 & CM194262017 (Interim Directions) VIRENDER SINGH CHANKOT ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocate. Through: Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2711.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his O.A. by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT), declining to quash the charge-sheet dated 2nd September, 2015 issued to him, the... Petitioner has filed the present petition.2. It requires to be noticed at the outset that at the time of issuing notice in the present petition on 22nd May, 2017, this Court stayed the departmental proceedings pursuant to the aforementioned charge-sheet.3. The... Petitioner was initially appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in the office of the Director of Accounts, Cabinet Secretariat, New D...
Rajesh Aggarwal vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6047/2019 RAJESH AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ruchir Batra, Adv. with petitioner in person versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State SI Vijay Pal, PS North Avenue Mr. Suraj Prakash, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41255/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6047/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the FIR No.19/2017 under Sections 279/304A IPC registered at P.S. North Avenue and proceedings consequent thereto. CRL.M.C.6047/2019 Page 1 of 4 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The brief facts of the case are t...
Parsvnath Developers Limited vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~A-3 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 + ARB.P. 608/2019 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra & Mr. Varun versus Garg, Advocates DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED Through: Mr. Tarun Johri & Mr. Ankit Saini, ..... Respondent Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. Pursuant to the last order, learned counsel for the respondent had furnished a panel of the Arbitrators to the petitioner. The list of Arbitrators has been handed over in Court and is taken on record.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is agreeable to the appointment of Mr. Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, Former Judge of the Supreme Court as an Arbitrator between the parties from the panel of Arbitrators.3. With the consent of the parties, Mr. Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, Former Judge of the Supreme Court, is appointed as a nominee Arbitrator of the pe...
Gail Gas Ltd. Vs.palak Construction Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 73/2018 & IA72132018 GAIL GAS LTD. Reserved on:24. 09.2019 Date of Decision :27. 11.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Chand Chopra, Kaur, Ms.Anupama Dhruve, Advs. Ms.Pavitra versus PALAK CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankit Gupta, Mr.Abhimanyu, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 30.09.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract/Letter of Award dated 01.07.2010 by which the petitioner had awarded the work for MDPE Pipeline Laying and Associated Works in City Zone Distribution (CGD) project of the petitioner in Meerut Region-2 to the respondent.2. Before the ...
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs.shri Sunil Godhwani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~63 & 64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:27. h November, 2019 CRL.M.C. 6018/2019 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr.Nitish Rana, SPP, Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Mr.Ali Khan and Mr.A.R.Aditya, Advs. along with Ms.Smriti Tripathi, Deputy Director and Mr.Rahul Verma, IO/AD/ED .... Respondent Versus SHRI SUNIL GODHWANI Through Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr.Rajat Katyal, Mr.Naunidh S. Arora, Mr.Ajay Tusheer and Mr.Karan Jain, Advs. CRL.M.C. 6019/2019 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr.Nitish Rana, SPP, Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Mr.Ali Khan and Mr.A.R.Aditya, Advs. along with Ms.Smriti Tripathi, Deputy Director and Mr.Rahul Verma, IO/AD/ED Versus + Crl.M.C.6018-19/2019 Page 1 of 12 SHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH Through Mr. Manu Sharma, Ms.Ridhima .... Respondent Mandhar, Mr.Kartik Khanna, and Mr.Vijay Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHA...
National Bal Bhawan vs.shailaja Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & CM APPL. 41509/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus VANDANA W.P.(C) 10050/2019 & CM APPL. 41579/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ROOPA SHARMA W.P.(C) 10056/2019 & CM APPL. 41590/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus RAJ BALA W.P.(C) 10058/2019 & CM APPL. 41594/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN versus RENUKA AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 10059/2019 & CM APPL. 41597/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus SHAILAJA SHARMA ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & conn. matters Page 1 of 9 + W.P.(C) 10060/2019 & CM APPL. 41600/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ANJALI BINDRA W.P.(C) 10066/2019 & CM APPL. 41612/2019 + ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus UMA SHARMA ..... Respondent Present: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate with Mr. R...
Ajit Mittal vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5963/2019 AJIT MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Neha Kapoor, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Ramesh, PS Mundka Respondent nos. 2 to 4 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.271/2015, dated 13.05.2015, u/s 287/304A IPC registered at P.S. Mundka and all the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Respondent nos.2 to 4 are the only legal heirs of the deceased Aakash wherein respondent no.2 is the father of the deceased, respondent no.3 is minor daughter of the deceased and respondent no.4 is widow of the deceased. CRL MC59632019 Page 1 of 4 3. It is the case of the prosecution that the deceased was working as a helper in the factory namely, Flowmech Engineers Pvt. Ltd., wherein the petitioner is the Managing Dir...
Delhi University Through Vice Chancellor vs.shingying Kristy & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7382019, C.M. Appl. No.50752/2019, 50753/2019, 50832/2019 DELHI UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE CHANCELLOR Through: Mr. Mahinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Koushik Ghosh, Ms. Manisha Relia, Advocates ..... Appellant versus SHINGYING KRISTY & ORS Through: Mr. Sahil Garg, Ms. Mansi Khanna, ..... Respondent Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER2711.2019 C.M. Appl. Nos. 50752/2019 & 50832/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. LPA7382019, C.M. Appl. No.50753/2019 (Stay) 1. The appellant/University is aggrieved by the judgment dated 08.11.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent no.1, inter alia, praying for directions to the University to admit her to the 3 years LLM course in the Academic Session, 2019-2020, in the ST category. LPA7382019 Page 1 of 5 2. It is not in dispute that the respondent No.1 had s...
Sunil Mittal & Anr. Vs.anup Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~17 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 645/2019, IA No.16653/2019(u/O.XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.16654/2019(exemption from filing original documents) & IA No.16655/2019(exemption) SUNIL MITTAL & ANR. Through: Mr. Amit Tomar with Mr. Chirag Rathor & Mr. Sudhir Balyan, Advs. ..... Plaintiffs versus ANUP GUPTA & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2711.2019 The plaintiffs have sued the two defendants namely (i) Anup Gupta; and, (ii) M/s. DADARZEE inter alia for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing the trade mark THE DARZI of the plaintiff and from passing off their tailoring services and tailored goods as that of the plaintiffs by using the word DADARZEE.2. As per the case of the plaintiffs, the mark of the defendants is DZINES AUF DARZEE (DADARZEE). No injunction restraining the defendants from using the said mark has been claimed.3. I have enquired from the counsel for the plaintiffs, whe...
Amarjeet Kaur Mavi vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2019 + LPA7472019 & CM APPLs.51206/2019, 51207/2019 AMARJEET KAUR MAVI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naushad Siddiqui and Ms. Cassandra Zosangliani, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Raghav Nagar, Adv. for UOI Ms. Arti Bansal, ASC for DDA with Mr. Ashutosh Nandan Atrey, Adv. for DDA/R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2711.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) LPA7472019 1. Learned counsel for the appellant (original petitioner) seeks permission to withdraw this appeal as well as W.P.(C) 8067/2015, as this appellant (original petitioner) wants to prefer a representation before the respondents for purchase of a small strip of land which is adjacent to her plot i.e. at M-44, Kalkaji, New Delhi.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. LPA7472019 Page 1 of 2 3. Lear...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »