Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Navin Kumar vs.deputy Commissioner South Zone Municipal Corporation an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 11.2019 + W.P. (C) No.1231/2018 NAVIN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Proxy counsel. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SOUTH ZONE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, SC, SDMC with Mrs. Shashi Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Manisha Chauhan & Mr. Zahid Hanief, Advocates for Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD for R-2. Insp. Rakesh Rawat & SI Amar Singh, PS R.K. Puram. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred for the following prayers :-"a) Direct the respondents to demolish/remove the unauthorized and illegal constructed shops and not allow rehri of the hawkers and encroachment on road side at Sector-I, Gate No.1,Opposite Kashmiri Market, Vivekanand Marg, R.K. Puram, New Delhi; W.P.(C) No.1231/2018 Page 1 of 3 b) Direct the respondents to remove the encroac...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors. Vs.chander Mukh Gauba
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2019 Decided on:27. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 7367/2009 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawant, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. versus CHANDER MUKH GAUBA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Mr. Varun Kalra, Advocate. AND W.P.(C) 7372/2009 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawant, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. versus GIRISH CHANDRA SHARMA .... Respondent Through: Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Mr. Varun Kalra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Government of NCT of Delhi has filed both these petitions W.P(C)7367/2009 and 7372/2009 Page 1 of 13 challenging a common order dated 29th September, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). While WP(C) No.7367/2009 is directed against the ord...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.r.c. Rangray and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11636/2016 & CM APPL. 45856/2016 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh with Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates. R.C. RANGRAY AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M. P. Raju and Mr. Krishna Kumar Mishra, Advocates for R-1 to R-8. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for R CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2711.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Urban Development and the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Personnel Training (DoPT) as well as the Central Public Works Department (CPWD)... Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 respectively have filed the present petition challenging an order dated 23rd January, 2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in OA No.3553/2010 filed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 8. The CAT in the impugned order issued directions to the... Petitioners herein to consider the cases of the ...
Vishnu Kumar Yadav vs.state (Gnct Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6049/2019 VISHNU KUMAR YADAV ........ Petitioner Through Mr. R A Sharma, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE (GNCT DELHI) & ANR Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS Insp. Jitender Kumar , SHO & SI Sanjay Kumar, PS NDRS Mr. Neeraj Lamba, R-2/complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing of FIR NO.244/2009 Registered at P.S. NDRS for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC on the ground that settlement has been arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no.2.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 15.07.2019, SI Satbir Singh, GRP Ambala, HC Vinod Kumar No.45/GRP, Ct. Suleman and RIC/ RPF Bhudev New Delhi RPF Post came to NDRS and one case 042 FIR, GRPF CRL.M.C.6049/2019 Page 1 of 3 Ambala was registered and accused Visnu Kumar S/o Rajeshwar ...
Aercomfort Pvt. Ltd. Vs.general Manager Northern Railway & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~A-46 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 481/2019 AERCOMFORT PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh C. Pandey, Advocate. versus GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAY & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for Railways with Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.16627/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. I.A. No.16626/2019 (delay) This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing application seeking extension of time for passing the Award. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the instant application is condoned. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 481/2019 Page 1 of 3 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 481/2019 1. This is a petition filed under Section 29A(5) of...
Pravinder Kansal vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.1284/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40100/2019 PRAVINDER KANSAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. C.L. Gupta , Advocate with Mr. Mandeep, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with SI Vineet Kumarr, PS Prashant Vihar. Date of Decision:27. h November, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 372 Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) on behalf of the complainant (father of the deceased) challenging the order on sentence dated 17th August, 2019 passed by ASJ/Special Judge (NDPS), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.58259/2016 arising out of FIR No.742/2007 registered with Police Station Prashant Vihar. The Trial Court had convicted the accused (respondent No.2) in the said case under Sections 302/364A/201 IPC and sente...
Pratibha Chauhan vs.state Election Commission & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~37, 38 & 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Date of Decision:27. 11.2019 LPA7452019 & CM APPLs. 51189/2019 (exemption) & 51191/2019 (exemption) PRATIBHA CHAUHAN ..... Appellant versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS LPA7462019 & CM APPLs. 51201/2019 (exemption) & 51202/2019 (exemption) PRATIBHA CHAUHAN versus POOJA & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS LPA7482019 & CM APPLs. 51210/2019 (exemption) & 51211/2019 (exemption) PRATIBHA CHAUHAN ..... Appellant versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Present: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. for appellant. Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Devanshu, Adv. for State Election Commission. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) CM APPLs. 51189/2019 (exemption) & 51191/2019 (exemption) in LPA7452019 CM APPLs. 51201/2019 (exemption) & 51202/2019 (exemption) in LPA7452019 & conn. matters Page 1 of 2 LPA7462019 CM APPLs. ...
S S K vs.a K
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 48/2017 Date of Decision:27. 11.2018 A K S S K Through: Mr.Maninder Singh and Ms.Smriti ..... Appellant Asmita, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Devinder ..... Respondent Chaudhary and + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 87/2018 & CM APPL. 17432/2018 Ms.Roopsi Sabharwal, Advocates. S S K A K Through: Mr.Devinder ..... Appellant Chaudhary and Ms.Roopsi Sabharwal, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Maninder Singh and Ms.Smriti ..... Respondent Asmita, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) MAT.APP.(F.C.) 87/2018 & CM APPL. 17432/2018 1. This is an appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred MAT. APP. (F.C.) Nos.48/2017 & 87/2018 Page 1 of 17 to as the Act) for setting aside judgment dated 21.12.2016 whereby a petition seeking grant of divorce on the ground of cruelty was dismissed and an alternate reli...
National Bal Bhawan vs.roopa Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & CM APPL. 41509/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus VANDANA W.P.(C) 10050/2019 & CM APPL. 41579/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ROOPA SHARMA W.P.(C) 10056/2019 & CM APPL. 41590/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus RAJ BALA W.P.(C) 10058/2019 & CM APPL. 41594/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN versus RENUKA AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 10059/2019 & CM APPL. 41597/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus SHAILAJA SHARMA ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & conn. matters Page 1 of 9 + W.P.(C) 10060/2019 & CM APPL. 41600/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ANJALI BINDRA W.P.(C) 10066/2019 & CM APPL. 41612/2019 + ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus UMA SHARMA ..... Respondent Present: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate with Mr. R...
Singh Gun House vs.ashish Singhania (Huf)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2019 RC.REV. 154/2019 & CM APPL. 11835/2019, CM APPL. 18942/2019, CM APPL.33483/2019 SINGH GUN HOUSE versus ASHISH SINGHANIA (HUF) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Mr. Aditya Rathee, Mr. Anish Ohlan and Mr. Shivam Gomber, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 05.10.2018, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Flat No.2 consisting of three rooms, one store, one bathroom and one W.C situated on the front half portion on the first floor of Prop...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »