Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Bal Bhawan vs.raj Bala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & CM APPL. 41509/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus VANDANA W.P.(C) 10050/2019 & CM APPL. 41579/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ROOPA SHARMA W.P.(C) 10056/2019 & CM APPL. 41590/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus RAJ BALA W.P.(C) 10058/2019 & CM APPL. 41594/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN versus RENUKA AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 10059/2019 & CM APPL. 41597/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus SHAILAJA SHARMA ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & conn. matters Page 1 of 9 + W.P.(C) 10060/2019 & CM APPL. 41600/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ANJALI BINDRA W.P.(C) 10066/2019 & CM APPL. 41612/2019 + ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus UMA SHARMA ..... Respondent Present: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate with Mr. R...
Paramjeet Singh vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 759/2017 PARAMJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Adv. (appearance not given) versus STATE & ORS Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Rajendra Dhoka, PS Rajouri Garden Respondent nos.2&3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.457/2013, dated 04.08.2013 registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden for the offences punishable under section 287/304A IPC.2. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties vide settlement deed executed on 18.08.2013. Pursuant to the settlement, respondent nos.2 & 3 do not want to pursue the case further against the petitioner.3. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 759/2017 Page 1 of 4 4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.5. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, ...
Suraj Parkash Manchanda vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 11.2019 + W.P. (C) No.5185/2019 SURAJ PARKASH MANCHANDA ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC, GNCTD with Mr. Chiraya Jain & Mr. Ishan Agrawal, Advocates for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers :-"i. ii. to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate direction to the Respondent - Govt of NCT of Delhi to rationalize circle rates of immovable properties / built-up flats and to fix minimum rates of flats commensurate with the category of the colony/area. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate direction to the Respondent - Govt. of NCT of Delhi to constitute a permanent expert valuation W.P.(C) 7080/2019 Page 1 of 3 committ...
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs.rotec Industries Inc. (Usa)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~A-45 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 480/2019 JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajesh, Ms. Meenakshi Rawat and Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Advocates. versus ROTEC INDUSTRIES INC. (USA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Bhagat and Mr. Ritik Malik, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.16605/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 480/2019 1. This is a petition filed under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking extension of time for completion of proceedings and passing of the Award, by the Arbitral Tribunal. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 480/2019 Page 1 of 2 2. Issue notice.3. Learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance and accepts notice.4. On 06.02.2018, the Arbitral Tribunal...
National Bal Bhawan vs.vandana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & CM APPL. 41509/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus VANDANA W.P.(C) 10050/2019 & CM APPL. 41579/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ROOPA SHARMA W.P.(C) 10056/2019 & CM APPL. 41590/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus RAJ BALA W.P.(C) 10058/2019 & CM APPL. 41594/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN versus RENUKA AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 10059/2019 & CM APPL. 41597/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus SHAILAJA SHARMA ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & conn. matters Page 1 of 9 + W.P.(C) 10060/2019 & CM APPL. 41600/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ANJALI BINDRA W.P.(C) 10066/2019 & CM APPL. 41612/2019 + ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus UMA SHARMA ..... Respondent Present: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate with Mr. R...
Din Bandhu Dass vs.aiims
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11341/2019 DIN BANDHU DASS Date of decision:27. 11.2019 ........ Petitioner AIIMS Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Senior Counsel with Mr.M.M.Singh and Mr.S.K.Pal, Advocates versus Through: Mr.Anand Varma, Mr.Shwetank ..... Respondent Singh and Mr.Dhairya Madan, Advocates for AIIMS. Mr.P.S.Bindra, Mr.G.S.Patwalia, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.46738/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11341/2019 and C.M.46737/2019 (stay) 3. The present petition is primarily directed against the tender clause No.13 of NIT No.06/S&E/14-83/2019-20/Hostel and NIT No.07/S&E/14- 65/2019-20/Hostel.4. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set-down for final hearing and disposal at the admission stage itself. W.P.(C) 11341/2019 page 1 of 6 5. A bid was invited by the respondent ...
Saroj Rani vs.manju Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2019 RC.REV. 203/2018 SAROJ RANI MANJU GUPTA versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Baloni, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Rajeev Saxena with Mr. Rachit Sahney, Ms. Namrata Chauhan and Mr. Manish Khurana, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT2032018 & CM APPL.19156/2018 RC.REV. (stay), CM APPL.19158/2018 (filed on behalf of petitioner for placing on record additional documents) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 24.11.2017, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from one room, one kitchen and baramdah on the second floor of property No.1407, Kucha Ustad, Hira Bazaar, Guliyan Dariba Kalan, Delhi, more particularly, as shown in red...
Sanjay Doval vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6350/2018 & C.M. APPL. 36235/2018 (Impleadment) ........ Petitioner Through Dr. S. S. Hooda, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Gigi C. George, Advocates for... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 3/UOI versus SANJAY DOVAL CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS. % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2711.2019 1. A Deputy Commandant of the Border Security Force (BSF) has filed the present petition seeking the expunction of adverse remarks in his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the period from 1st April, 2011 to 27th December, 2011. He also challenges the orders dated 14th March, 2014 and 3rd July, 2014 passed by the... RESPONDENTS rejecting his representations.2. The... Petitioner joined the BSF in 1997 and promoted as Deputy Commandant in March, 2004. He received an IGs commendation in 2008. According to the... Petitioner, he has throughout had an unblemished and outstanding track record. W.P.(C) 63...
Ashok Garg vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6044/2019 ASHOK GARG ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vijay Kasana, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI CL Kaphungkar, PS Keshavpuram Mr. Brijesh Yadav, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41251/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6044/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.481/2017 dated 09.09.2017, registered at P.S. Keshav Puram and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.6044/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The case of the prosecution is that the afore...
Delhi Public School Society & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4551/2018 and Crl.M.A.31631/2018, 35622- 35623/2018, 5574/2019 SALMAN KHURSHID ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aadil Singh Boparai, Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal, Mr. Shivanshu Singh & Mr. Prithvi Narula, Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Advocates along with petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Amar Colony Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vasudha Bajaj & Mr. A.Gupta, Advocates for R-5. + CRL.M.C. 5069/2018 and Crl.M.A.33507/2018 S.R VAISH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Advocate with Mr. Nitin Saluja, Mr. Mudit Gupta, Mr. Varun Singh, Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Akshay, & Mr. Harsh G. Advocates versus Crl. M.C. 4551/2018 & ors. Page 1 of 31 STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meen...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »