Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karan Mogha @ Karan Monga & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3343/2019 Date of decision:18. 11.2019 KARAN MOGHA @ KARAN MONGA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjay Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS W/SI Renu, PS Delhi Cantt. Ms. Richa, Complainant/ R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) $~1 * + 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.504/2015 dated 16.09.2015 registered at Police Station Delhi Cantt and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 19.11.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely CRL.M.C.3343/2019 Page 1 of ...
Arun Chopra vs.kaka-ka Dhaba Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h October, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h November, 2019 CS(COMM) 728/2018 ARUN CHOPRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate versus KAKA-KA DHABA PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Hiren Kamod & Mr.Rahul Vidhani, Advocates for D-1 to D-6 % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN I.A. 15056/2016 in CS (COMM) 728/2018 JUDGMENT1 This is an application by the plaintiff for stay of the proceedings in the present suit under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Facts 2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit on 06.03.2014 alleging infringement of his registered trademark K-D-H KAKE-DA- HOTEL by the defendants use of the mark KAKA-KA DHABA, KAKA-KA HOTEL, KAKA-KA RESTAURANT AND KAKA- CS (COMM) 728/2018 Page 1 of 18 KA GARDEN. His contention is that he is running a restaurant under the trademark K-D-H KAKE-DA-HOTEL, the mark having been adopted by his late father in 1931 ...
Mobin Ahmad vs.gajender Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 RC.REV. 398/2014 & CM APPL. 20364/2014, 13215/2017 MOBIN AHMAD GAJENDER SINGH versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.08.2015, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop in property bearing No.1812, Udai Chand Marg, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petiti...
Newton Engineering & Chemicals Ltd. Vs.indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~A-33 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 11.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 462/2019 NEWTON ENGINEERING & CHEMICALS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja & Mr. Akash Kumar Singh, Advocates versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam Roy & Ms. Mona Aneja, CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH Advocates JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 15990/2019 (Exemption). Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 462/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Anupam Roy, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. Present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 462/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to a petition filed in this court...
Ram Raghubir Pandey vs.union Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~5 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h October, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4802/2015 RAJAN MALHOTRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. H. P. Sharma with Mr. Paras Joshi, Advocates. UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates for R1 and R2. WITH + W.P.(C) 4803/2015 RAM RAGHUBIR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma with Mr. Mukesh Anand and Ms. Neha Chugh, Advocates. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates for R1 and R2. + AND W.P.(C) 11928/2015 WPC48032015 and connected matters Page 1 of 29 UNION BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates. versus RAJAN MALHOTRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. H. P. Sharma with Mr. Paras Joshi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Talwant S...
Parkash Chandra vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~31 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12054/2019 PARKASH CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava and Mr. for Advocates Bhuvanesh, UOI/respondent no.1. Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocate for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD for respondents no.2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL493692019(Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12054/2019 3. Present petition is directed against an order dated 26.08.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal). The first portion of the order reads as under: For certain employees, that too, who are accused of charges of corruption, greed for money is almost unlimited. They make an effort to present a picture as tho...
Padma Arora & Ors vs.rajesh Narula
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 RC.REV. 564/2019 PADMA ARORA & ORS versus RAJESH NARULA ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Sumit Ahuja, Advocate with petitioners in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Kapil Gupta with Mr. Abhinab Ram, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 564/2019 & CM APPL. No.42680/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 11.03.2019, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioners was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop RC.REV.564/2019 Page 1 of 3 bearing No.15, A Block, Poorvi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to th...
Vijay Kumar Diwakar vs.state of (Nct) of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 11.2019 + W.P.(C) 9126/2018 VIJAY KUMAR DIWAKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, Advocates versus STATE OF (NCT) OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Additional Standing Counsel for GNCT with Mr. Shashank Tiwari, Mr. Arpit Bisht, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Nitin for respondent No.2 (DUSIB). Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advocate for respondent No.3 (SDMC). Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (i) allow this writ petition and issue directions in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ or orders or directions to SDMC/respondent no.3 to demolish the illegal/unauthorized constructions that has been done on the 103 plots allotted to 157 W.P.(C) 9126/2018 Page 1 of 3 persons a...
Vivek Chaukar vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 W.P.(CRL) 1577/2019 CRL. M.A. 11505/2019 & CRL. M.A. 31102/2019 % + VIVEK CHAUKAR versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Inderbir Singh Alag, Senior Advocate : with Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Mr. Sumit Bhadana : and Mr. J.Singh, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for Ms. Kamna : Vohra, ASC for State. : SI Manish Kumar, P.S. Jagat Puri. : Mr. L.K. Giri and Mr. Atul Trivedi, : Advocates for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that FIR No.0095/2019 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered with PS Jagat Puri and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed.2. The said FIR was filed at the instance of respondent no.2 (the complainant). The petitioner contends tha...
Jogesh Batra vs.young Womens Christian Association of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 11.2019. W.P.(C) 2061/2018 JOGESH BATRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Tandon and Mr. R.V Naik, Advocates. versus YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sumeet Kaur and Ms. Ragini Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) Heard on the question of maintainability of the writ petition. The petitioner is aggrieved of termination of his service by the 2. respondent - Young Women's Christian Association of Delhi in short, YWCA, communicated to him vide letter dated 03.08.2017, forming part of the paper book as annexure P-3. At 3. maintainability was raised. the very institution of the writ petition, the question of its In view of the submission made by the ld. W.P.(C.) No.2061/2018 Page 1 of 6 counsel for the petitioner that YWCA has been asked by the government department to run hostels in the buildings, which were owned by the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »