Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union Bank of India vs.rajan Malhotra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~5 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h October, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4802/2015 RAJAN MALHOTRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. H. P. Sharma with Mr. Paras Joshi, Advocates. UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates for R1 and R2. WITH + W.P.(C) 4803/2015 RAM RAGHUBIR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma with Mr. Mukesh Anand and Ms. Neha Chugh, Advocates. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates for R1 and R2. + AND W.P.(C) 11928/2015 WPC48032015 and connected matters Page 1 of 29 UNION BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates. versus RAJAN MALHOTRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. H. P. Sharma with Mr. Paras Joshi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Talwant S...
Yogender Thakur @ Yogender Sharma vs.deepak Panchal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 RC.REV. 566/2019 YOGENDER THAKUR @ YOGENDER SHARMA ........ Petitioner versus DEEPAK PANCHAL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 566/2019 & CM APPL. No.42849/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 21.05.2019, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop bearing No.2701/B, Gali No.21, Sanjay Park, Baljeet Nagar, New RC.REV.566/2019 Page 1 of 3 Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petiti...
Consoritum of Sree-Meil vs.oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 11.2019 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 467/2019 $~A-34 * % + CONSORITUM OF SREE-MEIL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan & Mr. Fahad versus Imtiaz, Advocates OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD...... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil K. Jain & Mr. Abhishek Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 15997/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 467/2019 1. This is a joint petition filed by the petitioner and the respondent under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the Arbitral Proceedings and passing of the Award.2. It is submitted that time period lastly extended had expired on 03.10.2019 and the claimant is arguing in rejoinder after which arguments in clarification would be addressed by the respondent. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 467/2019 Pag...
Ranjeet vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 566/2016 RANJEET STATE Reserved on :13. 11.2019 Date of Decision :18. 11.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Advocate with Ms. Punam Singh, Advocate Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State along with SI Ganga Pal, P.S. Sarai Rohilla, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present revision petition has been filed under SectionCr.P.C. against the impugned judgment dated 31.05.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Central), Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.18/16.2. The Metropolitan Magistrate vide judgment dated 28.09.2015 convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 279 and 304A IPC. Vide order on sentence, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo SI for six months for the offence under Section 279 IPC and SI for two years for the offence under Section 304A IPC. He was also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 304A IPC...
Bhai Balbir Singh vs.bhai Sardar Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h November, 2019 + CM (M) 1086/2018 & CM APPLs. 37029/2018, 30353/2019 & 37367/2019 BHAI BALBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Adit S.Pujari & Ms. Tusharika Mattoo, Advocates. versus BHAI SARDAR SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pawanjit S. Bindra and Mr. Lakshay Dhamija, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate for R-2(b) & (c). (M:9811156437) Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Advocate for R- 3(a) & (b). (M:9811297368) Ms. Anusuya Sadhu Sinha, Mr. Bharat Monga and Mr. Shubhankar, Advocates for R-7. (M:9958696222) Mr. Sujoy Chatterjee, Advocate for R-11 & 12. (M:8447376187) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. A suit filed in 1984 is the subject matter of the present petition. One Late Bhai Sardar Singh had filed a suit for partition of joint family property against his siblings and other family members, who are legal heirs of Late Bhai Sunder Das. The suit was ...
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Anr vs.sanjeev Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h October, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h November, 2019 CS(COMM) 823/2018 MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Udita M.Patro & Ms.Pankhuri Malik, Advocates versus SANJEEV GUPTA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.M.P.Srivignesh, Advocate for D-1 & 2. Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Advocate for D-3 & 4. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT I.A. 5675/2018 (Application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC) & I.A. 12403/2018 (Application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC) in CS(COMM) 823/2018 1. The present suit is in respect of a patent of the plaintiffs, being Indian Patent No.209816, for the drug known as Sitagliptin, used for treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. The contention of the plaintiffs is that the manufacture and sale of a drug under the name of Swizglipt by the defendants infringes the suit patent, and particularly claims 17 and 19 thereof, which covers the chemical Sitagliptin and it...
Rites Limited vs.anupam Kudesia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 11.2019 + W.P.(C) 11171/2019 & CM APPL. No.45991/2019 (stay) RITES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Adv. versus ANUPAM KUDESIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagwan Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The present petition is directed against order dated 29.04.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) by which delay in filing the O.A. has been condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be deposited with the Delhi Legal Services Authority.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an inordinate and unexplained delay of approximately five years; and moreover the O.A. is devoid of material particulars. The petitioner has strongly opposed condonation of the inordinate delay urging that W.P.(C) 11171/2019 page 1 of 4 without recording any reasons, delay has been co...
Shri Parvinder Singh Gill @ Honey vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5819/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40417/2019 (delay) SHRI PARVINDER SINGH GILL @ HONEY ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dhananjai Rana, Adv. with petitioner in person STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Mehrab Alam, PS Ranjit Nagar Mr. Lovedeep Singh, Adv for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40416/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5819/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.102/2019 dated 22.04.2019, registered at P.S. Ranjit Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C.5819/2019 Page 1 of 2 taken up for fina...
Ram Saran vs.kartar Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % Reserved on:13. h November, 2019 Decided on :18. h November, 2019 RFA4252008 & CM APPL No.15502/2008 + RAM SARAN ..... Appellant Through : Mr.P.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus KARTAR SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.K.B.B.Singh and Mr.Atul Barthwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against an order dated 16.04.2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.147/06/1994 whereby the application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC filed by appellant was dismissed and also against the impugned judgment and preliminary decree dated 04.09.2008 passed by learned Trial Court in said suit.2. Before coming to the impugned orders, let me state in brief the facts of the case.3. The respondent No.1 had filed this suit for partition, possession and rendition of accounts with respect of ...
Dr. Nand Kishore Garg vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11641/2019 % DR. NAND KISHORE GARG Through: None ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naman Jain for Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC-GNCTD/R-1 Mr. Biraja Mahapatra and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advs. for R-2/DPCC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1811.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 11641/2019 1. When the matter is called out, nobody appears for the petitioner.2. This petition has been preferred as a Public Interest Litigation with the following prayers : (a) Issue a direction in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order/direction or directions to respondent No.l for an exemption of CNG driven vehicles W P (C) 11641/2019 Page 1 of 2 during period of odd and even scheme w.e.f. 04.11.2019 to 15.11.2019. and/or (b) Restrain the respondent No.1 from implementing the arbitrary odd and even scheme...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »