Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashish Bhalla vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 + CRL.A. 1049/2019 and CRL. M.A. Nos. 35936/2019, 37170/2019, 37171/2019, 37172/2019, 37248/2019 & 37249/2019 ASHISH BHALLA ..... Appellant versus STATE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent ..... Respondent : Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate : with Mr Shaunak Kashyap, Advocate. : Mr Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr Karanjeet : Sharma, Advocate with DCP Versha : Sharma, ACP K. Ramesh, SI Harpal : Madan and SI Deepak. : Mr Sanjay Abbot, Mr Ankit Agarwal and : Mr Abhimanyu Yadav, Advocates for R-2 : (Spirewood). : Mr Vivek Sibal and Mr Vikrant Pachnanda, : Advocates for complainant. : Mr Satya Prakash Yadav, Advocate for : Vishwendra. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 341 of 1. the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), impugning the order dated 28.08.2019 (hereafter the impugned order)...
Manoj vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1023/2015 & CRL. A. 360/2015 Reserved on :07. 11.2019 Date of Decision :18. 11.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anwesh Madhukar and Ms. Prachi Nirwan, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. IN THE MATTER OF: MANOJ STATE AND KHEM PAL @ HEM PAL ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present appeals have been filed challenging the common impugned judgment dated 27.11.2014 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.162/2014, registered under Sections 394/397/4IPC at Police Station Kotwali, Delhi. CRL.A. 1023/2015 & 360/2015 Page 1 of 5 2. Vide impugned judgment on conviction, the appellants were convicted for the offence under section 3IPC and Section 411 IPC and vide order on sentence dated 02.12.2014 the appellants were sentenced to undergo RI for a period of two year...
Subodh Gupta vs.herdsceneand & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 483/2019 & IAs No.12910/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 12912/2019 (u/O VII R-14(3) CPC), 14226/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC), 15952/2019 (u/O151CPC), 15953/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC), 16035/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) & 16037/2019 (u/S151CPC) SUBODH GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. & Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sddharth Garg, Mr. Sarnath Khanna & Ms. Neoma Vasdev, Advs. HERDSCENEAND & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhik Chimni with Mr. Tishampati Sen, Ms. Aarti Krupa Kumar & Mr. Priyal Agarwal, Advs. for D-1. Ms. Richa Srivastava with Ms.Nayantara Narayan & Ms. Malikah Mehra, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. & Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tejas Karia & Mr Ajit Warrier, Advs. for D-3. Mr. Udit Mendiratta & Mr. Ujval Mohan, Advs. for D-4. Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Neel Mason, Mr. Vihan Dang, Ms. R.Ramya, Mr. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu & Mr. Pratishth Kaushal, Advs. for D-5. ...
Vital Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs.central Medical Services Society & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2019 + LPA7182019 and CM Nos. 49273, 49274/2019 [ % VITAL HEALTHCARE PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Mr. Ranbir Kundu and Mr. Mansih Tanwar, Advs. versus CENTRAL MEDICAL SERVICES SOCIETY & ANR Through: Mr. Rishi Kant Singh, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS R-1 Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Upendra Sai, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1811.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.49273/2019 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. LPA7182019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant (original petitioner) against order dated 11th September, 2019 passed by the learned writ court in W.P.(C) 1853/2018. LPA7182019 Page 1 of 3 2. Looking to the facts of the case it appears that earlier the aforesaid W.P.(C) 1853/2018 was dismissed in default vide order dat...
The Statesman Limited vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 9497/2015 & CM APPL. 22279/2015, CM APPL. 32774/2017 THE STATESMAN LIMITED Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Adv. for R-3 THE STATESMAN LIMITED + WP(C) 10534/2015 & CM APPL. 32773/2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Adv. versus ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1811.2019 Has the petitioner suffered heavy cash losses consecutively, for the % 1. years 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011, so as to be insulated from the requirement of paying revised wages, in terms of the Majithia Wage Board Award (hereinafter referred to as the Majithia Wage Board Award), which was implemented on 11th November, 2011 ?. WP (C) 9497/2015 & WP (C) 10534/2015 Page 1 of 31 2. T...
M/S Deepak Textile & Anr vs.sanjay Gautam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 RC.REV. 585/2019 M/S DEEPAK TEXTILE & ANR SANJAY GAUTAM versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar Vijay and Ms. Neeru Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 44463/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 585/2019 & 44462/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 21st May, 2019 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bona fide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop RC.REV.585/2019 Page 1 of 6 bearing private No.1 in property bearing municipal No.1009/16, Kucha Natwan, Chandani Ch...
Ramswaroop vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 01.11.2019 Judgement pronounced on 18.11.2019 RAMSWAROOP + W.P.(C) 9075/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar Shukla, and Mr. Murari Kumar Shukla, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, and Mr. Kousik Ghose, Advocates for the University of Delhi. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface: The petitioner via this writ petition seeks a slew of directions which effectively boil down to the following: (i) First, he is given admission in the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category by respondent No.3 i.e. Shaheed Bhagat Singh College, Delhi (in short SBS College) in B.A. programme (Political Science + W.P. (C) No.9075/2019 Page 1 of 10 Geography) [in short subject programme]. in the academic session 2019- 2020. (ii...
Rahul@chirmanti vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 CRL.A. 45/2016 VINAY STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms Naomi Chandra, Advocate (DHCLSC). For the Respondent : Ms Amit Gupta, APP for State. AND CRL.A. 63/2016 RAHUL@CHIRMANTI versus STATE ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms Suman Chauhan, Advocate (DHCLSC). For the Respondent : Ms Amit Gupta, APP for State. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The appellants have filed the present appeals impugning a judgment dated 23.11.2015, whereby they have been convicted of the Crl. A. Nos. 45/2016 and 63/2016 Page 1 of 19 offences under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The appellant in Crl.A.63/2016 (Rahul @ Chirmanti) has also been convicted of an offence under Section 397 IPC.2. The appellants have also impugned an order dated 30.11.2015, senten...
Reepak Kansal and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12103/2019 % REEPAK KANSAL AND ANR. Through:... Petitioners in person ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv. for R- 1/UOI Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC with Mr. Sidharth Agarwal and Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1811.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 12103/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : (i) Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus praying for issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing respondent No.1 W P (C) 12103/2019 Page 1 of 3 to restrict the respondent No.2 to provide security in the courts of law at. Delhi and to deploy other trained and experienced security forces in the courts of Delhi ; and/or. (ii) Wri...
Harish Kapoor & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~80 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5839/2019 Date of decision:18. 11.2019 HARISH KAPOOR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS ASI Vijay Pal Singh, PS CWC Nanakpura Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 40473/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5839/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.106/2013 dated 02.07.2013 registered at Police Station CWC Nanakpura and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.5839/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and responde...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »