Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Liyakat Ali vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 958/2019 Reserved on :05. 11.2019 Date of Decision :18. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: LIYAKAT ALI STATE Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Roy, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 By way of present revision petition, the petitioner has challenged his conviction and sentence for the offences punishable under Sections 304-A/279 IPC.2. Vide judgment dated 26.09.2017, the trial court convicted the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 279/304A IPC and vide order on sentence dated 0911.2017 he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 304A and in default to undergo SI for 3 days.... Petitioner was also sentenced to undergo SI for six months for the offence under Section 279 IPC.3. In appeal, vide judgment dated 08.07.19, the conviction of the petitioner was upheld. However, the sentence f...
The State vs.fakar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 555/2019 THE STATE Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ........ Petitioner with Insp.Jaspal Singh, PS Mangolpuri. versus FAKAR & ANR. Through None. ........ RESPONDENTS Date of Decision:18. h November, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, learned APP for the State has handed over a report of the SHO, Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi wherein it is stated that Fakar (respondent No.1) had received injuries on 27th October, 2019 and had subsequently succumbed to the same on 29th October, 2019. In view of the aforesaid, present proceedings qua Fakar (respondent No.1) stand abated.2. It is pertinent to mention that the present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment/order of acquittal dated 25th July, 2019 passed by Additional Session Judge 03, North-West, Rohini, Delhi, in Sessions Case No....
Steelcase Inc. Vs.mr.k.j. Bhuta and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h November, 2019 CS(COMM) 1180/2018 STEELCASE INC. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. B. B. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Wadhwa, Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Mr. Pranav Gambhir, Ms. Gitanjali Sharma, Advocates versus MR. K.J.BHUTA AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Alankar Kirpekar, Advocate with Mr.Mr. Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Ms. Malavika A. S. Advocates for D-1 Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Snehima Jauhari, Mr. Shobhit Srivastava, Mr. Sohrab S. Mann, Advocates for D-2 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT I.A. 7450/2019 (Application by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC) in CS(COMM) 1180/2018 1. By this application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as the CPC]., the plaintiff seeks leave to amend the plaint. Facts 2. The suit concerns the trademark STEELCASE, of which the plaintiff claims to be the registered owner. In the su...
Aishwarya Adhikari vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12084/2019 and CM No.49485/2019 % AISHWARYA ADHIKARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tenzin Chodon, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Priyanka Arora and Mr. Upendra Sai, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC-GNCTD with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1811.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.49485/2019 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C) 12084/2019 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : W P (C) 12084/2019 Page 1 of 4 a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the... RESPONDENTS to immediately establish a strong referral mechanism where the ASHA's and Anganwadi Workers will coordinate with Mohalla Clinic and take responsibility to prov...
Ms. Sneha Vats vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 01.11.2019 Judgement pronounced on 18.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 7854/2019 & & CM APPL. 32663/2019 MS. SNEHA VATS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurmehar Sistani, Ms. Dezy Gaur, and Mr. Ravinder Adlakha, Advocates. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, and Mr. Kousik Ghosh, Advocates for the University of Delhi. Mr. Anil Dabas, and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocates for R-2. Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, and Mr.Shubham Gairola, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar Shukla, and Mr. Murari Kumar Shukla, Advocates for R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:1. This case, while it presents a hard set of facts, is also a case that seems straight out of Sir Arthur Conan Doyles book. Why I say so will become apparent on noticing the facts which are set forth hereafter. W.P. (C) No.7854/2019 Page 1 of 19 1.1. On 05.05.2019, the petitio...
s.s. Thapar vs.l.r. Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % Reserved on:13. h November, 2019 Decided on :18. h November, 2019 RFA9652019 & CM APPL No.48847/2019 + S.S. THAPAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Suneet Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus L.R VERMA ..... Respondent Cinmoy, Mr.Ajay Kr.Tiwari, Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Advocates. Through: Mr.Moni CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-06/South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.10039/2016 whereby the suit of the respondent/plaintiff filed under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs.85.00 lac was decreed for Rs.74.00 lac on failure of the appellant to deposit the amount in learned Trial Court as ordered while allowing the leave to defend application of appellant.2. The brief facts are:-"a)the respondent filed summary suit for money re...
Sanjay vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4696/2018 and CM No.18069/2019 % SANJAY Through: Mr. Anurag Saha, Mr.Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anu Gupta, Adv. for R-1/EDMC Mr. Anjum Javed, ASC-GNCTD with Mr. Devendra Kumar, Ms. Priti, Advs. for R-3 with SI Naeem Ali from PS Bhajan Pura Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC and Mr. Premsagar Pal, Advs. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1811.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 4696/2018 1. This so called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : (a) Issue writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or W P (C) 4696/2018 Page 1 of 3 directions to the Respondent No.1 to 4, thereby directing... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 4 to initiate demolition/sealing of property/Plot b...
Manik Guglani & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5834/2019 MANIK GUGLANI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjay Padam Jain, Adv. with petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Vikram, PS Hari Nagar Mr. Mohinde Dhawan, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 40460/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5834/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.59/2016 dated 12.01.2016 registered at Police Station Hari Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5834/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 26.06...
Rajan Malhotra & Anr. Vs.union Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~5 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h October, 2019 Pronounced on:18. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4802/2015 RAJAN MALHOTRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. H. P. Sharma with Mr. Paras Joshi, Advocates. UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates for R1 and R2. WITH + W.P.(C) 4803/2015 RAM RAGHUBIR PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma with Mr. Mukesh Anand and Ms. Neha Chugh, Advocates. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates for R1 and R2. + AND W.P.(C) 11928/2015 WPC48032015 and connected matters Page 1 of 29 UNION BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Janendra Lal with Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Advocates. versus RAJAN MALHOTRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. H. P. Sharma with Mr. Paras Joshi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Talwant S...
M/S Chopra General Store & Ors vs.assa Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 RC.REV. 354/2015 M/S CHOPRA GENERAL STORE & ORS ........ Petitioners versus ASSA RAM ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Ansari with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocates with petitioner No.2 in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Satyender Chahar and Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 354/2015 & CM APPL.12630/2015 (stay), CM APPL.29202/2018 (directions), CM APPL. 44812/2018 (for recall of order dated 24.07.2018) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 16.03.2015, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioners was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking RC.REV.354/2015 Page 1 of 3 eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e)...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »