Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kuldeep & Ors. Vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Judgment Reserved on :21. 10.2019 Date of Decision :19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF + CRL.A. 28/2013 KULDEEP & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mohd. Shamikh, Advocate. STATE CRL.A. 131/2013 DEVINDER STATE versus Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for State. ..... Respondent AND Through: Mohd. Shamikh, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 By way of the present appeals, the appellants have assailed the common judgment on conviction dated 08.10.2012 and order on sentence dated 19.12.2012 in FIR No.6under Sections 3IPC and Sections 25/27/of the Arms Act, P.S. Nand Nagri whereby all the appellants were convicted under Sections 3IPC and were sentenced to RI for four years along with fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default whereof to undergo RI for one year. It was also directed that the fine imposed i.e., CRL.A. 28/2013 & CRL.A. 131/2013 P a g e 1 of 18 Rs.1,00,000/- (i...
Sachin & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3364/2019 SACHIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Supriya Juneja, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ..... Respondent SI Naeem Ali, PS Gokulpuri Mr. Amit Yadav, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby 1. quashing FIR No.360/2016 dated 04.06.2016, registered at P.S. Gokul Puri and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C.3364/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.6...
Rita Vashishtha vs.anil Kumar Vashishtha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:23. d April, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:_19_November, 2019 % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 188/2017 RITA VASHISHTHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Mr.Saurabh Dhingra, Ms.Swadha Gupta and Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocates Versus ANIL KUMAR VASHISHTHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Anil Sharma, Mr.Arun Baali and Mr.Kunal Nath, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the judgment dated 16.09.2017 passed by the Family Court by which the petition filed by the respondent/husband seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) was allowed and a decree of divorce has been granted.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 03.11.1995, at Hath...
b.b.oberai vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1322/2019 Order reserved on:02. 09.2019 Order decided on:19. 11.2019 B.B. OBERAI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Arvind Singh and Mr. Vipin Singh Raghav, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Lao, Sanjay ASC (Criminal) with SI Abhishek Kumar, P.S.: Amar Colony Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, ASC with Mr. Manek Singh, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J.1. Vide the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 482 Cr.P.C, petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 & 2 to initiate appropriate department action against the respondent W.P.(Crl.) 1322/2019 Page 1 of 16 3 to 5 for illegal demolition of part of property bearing No.B-66, Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi i.e. house of the petition...
Purshottam Anand vs.suraj Prakash Wahi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2019 RC.REV. 253/2016 PURSHOTTAM ANAND versus SURAJ PRAKASH WAHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Viney Sharma and Mr. Sahil Talwar, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.12.2015, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one private shop bearing No.1 out of property bearing No.GL/8, Municipal No.WZ-297 situated at G Block, Jail Road, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site p...
Employees Welfare Fund & Ors. Vs.kra Infrasturcture Developers p.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 746/2017 EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Vikas Gupta & Mr. Ieshaan Gupta, Advs. versus KRA INFRASTURCTURE DEVELOPERS P.LTD. Through Mr. Nimesh Chib & Mr. Siddharth Chaturvedi, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks directions thereby to quash the complaint case No.107filed under Section 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending adjudication in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate - 01 (Nl Act), West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. The case of the respondent/ complainant is that petitioners have drawn the cheques referred in the complaint for a sum of Rs 4.1 crore in favour of CRL.M.C.746/2019 Page 1 of 5 the respondent in discharge of legally recoverable debt pursuant to the terms of the MOU/ Agreement to Sell dated 19.6.2015 but the said chequs, u...
Biresh vs.the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11533/2017 BIRESH Through: None ........ Petitioner versus THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC (GNCTD) with Mr. Deepak Srivastava, Adv. for R-1, 2, 4, 5 & 6 Mr. Rambir Chauhan & Mr. Paramveer Chauhan, Advs. for R-7 Ms. Pooja Kalra & Mr. Virender, Advs. for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT1 When the matter is called out, nobody appears for the petitioner. This so-called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: to 6 a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or directions directing the Respondent Nos.1 illegal constructions and encroachment carried out by land mafia and land grabbers in khasra no.19/measuring 1 biga 14 biswas (1700 sq.yards) located at a prime location near to 100 futa main to s...
The Statesman Limited vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 9497/2015 & CM APPL. 22279/2015, CM APPL. 32774/2017 THE STATESMAN LIMITED Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Adv. for R-3 THE STATESMAN LIMITED + WP(C) 10534/2015 & CM APPL. 32773/2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Adv. versus ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1811.2019 Has the petitioner suffered heavy cash losses consecutively, for the % 1. years 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011, so as to be insulated from the requirement of paying revised wages, in terms of the Majithia Wage Board Award (hereinafter referred to as the Majithia Wage Board Award), which was implemented on 11th November, 2011 ?. WP (C) 9497/2015 & WP (C) 10534/2015 Page 1 of 31 2. T...
Om Parkash (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.ghayasuddin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 594/2019 Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 OM PARKASH (DECEASED) THR LRS ........ Petitioner versus GHAYASUDDIN ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Rajeev Saxena and Mr.Manish Khurrana, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.Faisal Naseem, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 25.04.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with regard property bearing No.4802, Phatak Namak, Hauz Qazi, Delhi 110006 more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to RC.REV.594/2019 Page 1 of 3 the eviction petition.3. Learned counsel ...
Vinay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2019 CRL.A. 45/2016 VINAY STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms Naomi Chandra, Advocate (DHCLSC). For the Respondent : Ms Amit Gupta, APP for State. AND CRL.A. 63/2016 RAHUL@CHIRMANTI versus STATE ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms Suman Chauhan, Advocate (DHCLSC). For the Respondent : Ms Amit Gupta, APP for State. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The appellants have filed the present appeals impugning a judgment dated 23.11.2015, whereby they have been convicted of the Crl. A. Nos. 45/2016 and 63/2016 Page 1 of 19 offences under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The appellant in Crl.A.63/2016 (Rahul @ Chirmanti) has also been convicted of an offence under Section 397 IPC.2. The appellants have also impugned an order dated 30.11.2015, senten...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »