Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rattan Lal vs.om Wati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 44/2016 RATTAN LAL OM WATI Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2019 versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Sehgal, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Sethi with Mr. Mukesh Ranan, Advocates with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 24.08.2015, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from one shop bearing private No.2, at Ground Floor having Municipal No.WZ- 422, Churiwali Gali, Nangal Raya, New Delhi-46, more particularly RC.REV. 44/2016 Page 1 of 3 as shown in red colour in the sit...
S Block Welfare Society & Ors vs.vidyut Arora & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~10, 11 and 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + S BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS CM (M) 214/2019 and CM APPL. 6012/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for with (M: person in... Petitioner 9871339314). VIDYUT ARORA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, Advocate (M:98110. 6767). WITH11and 16 + CM (M) 266/2019 and CM APPL. 7204/2019 CM (M) 829/2019 and CM APPLs. 25224/2019, 25225/2019, 39211/2019 VIDUT ARORA Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, ........ Petitioner Advocate (M:98110. 6767). S-BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for R- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH13,8,9,12 and 13 (M:98713. 9314). Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. These three petitions relate to the Residents Welfare Association of S- Block, GK-1, known as the S-Block Welfare Society. The elections to the said society were held on 30th April, 2017 and the same...
Kirti Vashisht vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5933/2019 & Crl.M.A.40833/2019 1. KIRTI VASHISHT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Satish Sharma, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS SI Pankaj, Insp. Gajender Singh, PS Kapashera, SI Raghubir, PS Najafgarh, SI Surender Singh, BHD Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent no 2 to 4 to close the enquiry initiated vide notices dated 23.08.2019 and 26.08.2019 on complaint dated 26.07.2019 made by respondent no.7 pending before respondent no.3 and 4 i.e. P.S. Kapashera, New Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent no.7/Babita Sharma filed a complaint dated 10.04.2017 bearing D.D No.65B (hereinafter referred to as 'The First Complaint') against the petitioner alleging forgery CRL.M.C. 5933/2019 Page 1 of 13 before the respond...
Ramanpreet Kaur vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 1843/2019 & CRL.M.A. 13377/2019 RAMANPREET KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raghav Parwatiyar, Mr. Rohit Bhalla and Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr. Aaryan Verma, Advocate for UOI. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Reserved on:19. h November, 2019 Date of Decision:29. h November, 2019 MANMOHAN, J: JUDGMENT1 Present petition has been filed by the sister of the detenue Ramanpreet Kaur seeking release of her detained brother Gagan Jot Singh. The petitioner prays for an issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash Detention Order dated 11th March, 2019 passed against the detenue under Section 3(1) of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as COFEPOSA) by respondent No.2 as well ...
Apfc Employees Provident Funds Organisation vs.m/s Profolab
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"29.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 9029/2019 & CM No.37280/2019 (delay) APFC EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUNDS ORGANISATION Through: Ms. Rashmi Bansal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S PROFOLAB ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Patnaik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the APFC Employees Provident Funds Organisation assails the order dated 05.08.2011 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal. Under the impugned order, the appeal preferred by the respondent-employer was allowed, thereby setting aside the order under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act for short) directing the respondent to deposit the provident fund dues of its ex-employee Ms. Asha Nangia. The petitioner also assails the order dated 30.01.2017 whereby its belated review petition was rejected by the Tribunal.2. The case of the peti...
Zasha Advertising Pvt Ltd vs.abhijit Roy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Delivered on:29. h November, 2019 RFA3372019 & CM APPL No.17611/2019 ZASHA ADVERTISING PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Dhruv Kapur and Mr.Maharshi Kalra, Advocates. versus ABHIJIT ROY ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the order dated 07.01.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-4/ South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.18/2019 whereby the suit of the appellant under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs.4,71,320/- against the respondent/defendant was dismissed in limine.2. a) The brief facts are: on 26.05.2018 the Respondent placed purchase order upon the Appellant at Delhi for taking the Appellant's service for branding AC bus with effect from 27.05.2018 for a period of one month at the rate of Rs.78,000/- excluding ...
M/S D S S Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs.manoj Kayal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~45 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 CM(M) 1701/2019 and CM APPL. 51535/2019, 51536/2019 M/S D S S BUILDTECH PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashwarya Sinha and Mr. Alok K. Singh, Advocates (M:99993. 9092). MANOJ KAYAL versus Through: ....Respondent Shrey Sinha, Advocate (M:8447355352) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) CM APPL515362019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 1701/2019 & CM APPL. 51535/2019 2. The present petition under Article 227 has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30th October, 2019 passed by the NCDRC. The said order reads as under :-"We have partly heard the learned counsel for the appellants on admission, and perused the entire material on record including inter alia specifically the impugned Order dated 09.01.2019 of the State Commission. The State Commission vide its impugned Order dated 09.01.2019 had allowed ...
Shambhu Sharma and Ors. Vs.high Court of Delhi Thr. Its Registrar Gene ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2019 Decided on:29. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 9546/2016 SHAMBHU SHARMA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THR. ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Karthik Sundar and Ms. Rajshree Jaiswal Advocates for Delhi High Court. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This class action litigation has been instituted by six employees of this Court, aggrieved by the disparities in the grant of clothing and dress maintenance allowance, also called washing allowance.2.... Petitioner No.1 is presently a Judicial Assistant (JA),... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are Senior Judicial Assistants (SJAs),... Petitioner No.4 is a Senior Judicial Translator (SJT),... Petitioner No.5 is a Judicial Translator (JT) and... Petitioner No.6 is a Junior Judicial Assistant (JJA). W.P.(C) 9546/2016 Page 1 of 25 3. It is ...
Union of India & Anr vs.devender Kumar Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2743/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates versus DEVENDER KUMAR GOEL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Ms. Garima Shukla, Mr. Pardeep Jatav and Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2911.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Union of India has filed this writ petition challenging an order dated 11th November, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT), allowing O.A. No.1482/2007. The CAT has by the impugned order quashed the charge-sheet dated 4th August, 1997 as well as a penalty order dated 15th March, 2007 issued against the Respondent, with all consequential benefits.2. While directing notice to issue in present petition on 28th August, 2011, the impugned order of the CAT was stayed. W.P.(C)...
Subhash Chand & Anr vs.gauri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2019 RC.REV. 220/2017 & CM APPL. 16682/2017, 30839/2017 SUBHASH CHAND & ANR versus GAURI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Naveeen K. Sharma and Mr. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal, Advocates with petitioner No.2 in person. For the Respondent: Mr. G.D. Chopra, Advocate with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.11.2016, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from one shop on the ground floor of property bearing No.3502, Ward No.9, Gali RC.REV. 220/2017 Page 1 of 3 Bajrang Bali, Sita Ram Bazar, Near ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »