Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Chand @ Subhash Chandra vs.reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~6 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. 11.2019 MAC.APP. 600/2016 SUBHASH CHAND @ SUBHASH CHANDRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus RELIANCE GEN INS CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 09.03.2016 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.120/11, on the ground that instead of minimum wages of Rs. 6,422/-, applicable to an unskilled workman, the learned Tribunal assumed that Rs. 6,000/- was an amount which a person who was engaged in stitching and knitting work would be earning. The claimants stated that the deceased was earning Rs. 8,000/- per month. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that minimum wages for an unskilled person at the relevant time was Rs. 6,422/-.2. The Court would note that a person engaged in stitching and knitting work surely has skills, therefore, th...
Mrs. Vinod vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2019 Decided on:19. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 2432/2013 MRS. VINOD UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR versus Through: Mr. J.P.Shukla, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH J U D G M EN T Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in the present petition is to an order dated 19th November, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.2165/2009 as well as to an order dated 19th April, 2012 dismissing Review Application No.19/2011.2. The issue involved in the case at hand concerns the plea for regularisation of the... Petitioner, who was working as a Mobile Booking Clerk (MBC) in the Northern Railway, with retrospective effect, and for re-fixation of her seniority.3. At the outset, it requires to be noted that there were two... Petitioners in the above OA No.2165/2009 before the CAT. Th...
Mohd. Furqan & Ors. Vs.raisuddin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2019 RC.REV. 445/2017 MOHD FURQAN & ORS versus RAISUDDIN ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.K. Bhaduri and Mr.Prem Prakash, Advocates with... Petitioner Nos.1 and 3 in person. For the Respondent: Mr.Diwan Singh Chauhan, Adv.. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 03.06.2017, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with regard property i.e. One room, kitchen store at ground floor and one room at first floor (now converted into 2 rooms) kitchen with Common latrine RC.REV.445/2017 Page 1 of 3 and bat...
Delhi Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animal (Dspca) vs.joint Lab ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"19.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 12376/2018 & C.M. No.48039/2018 (for stay) DELHI SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMAL (DSPCA)... Petitioner Through: Ms.Sonia A. Menon & Ms.Vanita ..... versus Chauhan, Advs. JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jawahar Raja, ASC with Ms.Kritika Padode, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Rajiv Agarwal with Ms.Sugandha Kochar & Mr.Nawlendu Bhushan, Advs. for R-2 to 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the management seeks quashing of the show cause notice dated 12.10.2018 issued to it by the respondent no.1, directing the petitioner society to deposit an amount of Rs.51,56,132/- in compliance of the award dated 22.12.2017.2. The award dated 22.12.2017 was passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Dwarka Court in I.D. No.(Old No.24/1972) whereunder the Tribunal, after holding that the respondent/workmen had been illegally ter...
Sh. Rakesh Mishra vs.m/s Hukson Trading Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8244/2017 Date of Decision :-"19.11.2019 ........ Petitioner SH. RAKESH MISHRA Through: Mr.K.C. Dubey, Adv. versus M/S HUKSON TRADING CORPORATION Through: Mr.Ashish Sharma, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the workman assails the award dated 05.04.2017 passed by the learned Labour Court-XVI, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LIR No.1486/16. Under the impugned award the learned Labour Court has, after coming to the conclusion that the petitioner voluntarily left his job with the respondent after settling all dues in order to join another company, rejected the petitioners claim by holding that he was not illegally terminated.2. The petitioner, claiming that he had been engaged as a Field Worker in the respondent establishment since February, 2007 before being illegally terminated on 27.09.2013, raised an industrial dispute which came to be referred t...
Honeycom Synergies vs.commissioner of Customs (Export) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6495/2019 & CM APPL.27484/2019 HONEYCOM SYNERGIES Through: Mr. ........ Petitioners Seth, Mr.Chinmaya Seth & Mr.Ekansh Mishra, Adv A.K. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. Central Govt., Counsel for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The proceedings which were commenced, against the petitioner, vide Show Cause Notice No.09/2017, dated 24th March, 2017, issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), stands settled, by Final Order, dated 1st November, 2018, passed by the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission) in Settlement Application No.5580/2018, subject to appropriation of 84,28,058/-, deposited by the petitioner towards Customs Duty escaped on imports effec...
Parvesh Kumar & Ors. Vs.arun Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2019 C.R.P. 262/2019 & CM APPL. No.49784-85/2019 PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus ARUN KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Neha Kapoor and Mr. Mohit, Advocates For the Respondent: Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 14.10.2019 whereby the application of the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.2. Subject suit was filed by the respondent No.1 seeking permanent injunction against the petitioners and respondent No.2 to 6 thereby restraining them from raising illegal and unauthorized construction over and above the property bearing No.310-A, Chuna Bhatti, Ram Sukkha Camp, Mathura Road, Badarpur, New Delhi, more particularly shown in red colour in the site plan annexed t...
Nitika Gupta vs.sudha Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2019 + CM(M) 1644/2019 and CM APPL. 49836/2019, 49837/2019 NITIKA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandra Shekhar Goswami, versus Advocate (M:78383. 0149). SUDHA GUPTA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The... Petitioner (Respondent before the Trial Court) challenges the impugned order dated 18th October, 2019 by which the right of the cross examination of PW3 has been closed. The said order reads as under:-"Ld. Proxy counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that respondent is in JC, however, no details has been provided qua the case under which respondent is in JC. It is further submitted that main counsel is stated to be busy in attending some matter in Hon'ble High Court of Patna, so he is ready to cross- examine PW-3. I have heard the submissions made and after perusal of the record, it reveals that today was the last and final...
Jai Singh Mathur vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4704/2019 JAI SINGH MATHUR ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Preeti Srivastava and Mr. Chirag Khurana, Advs. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ASI Nand Kishore, PS Delhi Cantt. Mr. Kunal Malhora, Adv. for R-2 With respondent no.2 in person THE STATE & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.39/2016 dated 04.02.2016, registered at PS Delhi Cantt. and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C. 4704/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection ...
Cube Construction Engineering Ltd vs.national High Speed Rail Corporat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. h September, 2019 Pronounced on:19. November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3490/2019, C.M. Appl. No.16007/2019 (Stay), C.M. Appl. No.19560/2019 (placing on record the documents), & C.M. Appl. No.33954/2019 (Amendment in prayer) CUBE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nakul Dewan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Mr. Dharita Punish Malkan, Mr. Bhaskar Singh, Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGH SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Konark Rishi Bhatnagar, Ms. Prashanti, Ms. Dipika Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Rule D.B.2. Pleadings are complete.3. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is set down for today for final hearing and disposal.4. The necessary facts, which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition a...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »