Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parvinder Singh & Anr. Vs.vandana Walecha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2019 RC.REV. 663/2019 PARVINDER SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners versus VANDANA WALECHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms. Anubha Goel, Mr. Mayank Joshi and Ms. Tanisha Bawa, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Hemant Chadhri, Mr. Piyush Arora and Mr. Gaurav, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 50366/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CAV11542019 In view of the appearing of the learned counsel for the respondent, caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 663/2019 & CM APPL. 50365/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 06.06.2019, whereby eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed after trial. RC.REV. 663/2019 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent ...
Pradeep & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2019
$~58 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5954/2019 Date of decision:22.11.2019 PRADEEP & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. B.S. Chowdhary, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State with Inspector Gulshan Kumar, PS Sultan Puri Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40891/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5954/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.191/2007 dated 07.02.2007 registered at Police Station Sultan Puri and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 5954/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have set...
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Sonepat & Ors vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h November, 2019 + WP(C) 822/2015 COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX, SONEPAT & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus AMIT DECORATIVE PLYWOODS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through: Mr. Sudhir Malhotra, ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. These proceedings emanate from a Show Cause Notice, dated 16th January, 2013, issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (Petitioner No.2 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as the DGCEI) to the respondents, whereby it was alleged that... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 (M/s. Amit Decorative Plywoods Pvt Ltd and M/s Amit Densified Doors Pvt Ltd) had indulged in clandestine removal and undervaluation of goods manufactured by them. The Show Cause Notice required the respondents to show cause as to why WP (...
Jasbir Singh vs.madhu Aggarwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2019 RC.REV. 88/2017 & CM APPL. Nos. 8756-57/2017, 51485/2018 JASBIR SINGH versus MADHU AGGARWAL & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Mohit Gupta and Mr. Pawan Dubey, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.P.K. Bahl and Mr.Bharatdeep Singh, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 09th January, 2017 whereby the eviction petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(i)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of bona fide necessity has been dismissed after trial.2.... Petitioner had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the respondent from one shop on the Ground Floor of the property bearing No.E-9, Jawahar Park, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi 110092. RC.REV.88/2017 Page 1 of 4 3. One of the contentions of the petitioner is that there a...
Harjeet Singh Bedi vs.m/s Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~37 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2019 CM(M) 1638/2019 and CM APPL. 49574/2019, 49575/2019, 49576/2019 HARJEET SINGH BEDI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate with... Petitioner in person. versus M/S ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY INDIA LIMITED (ARCIL) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Usha Singh, Advocate for R-1 (M:97111. 9205). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order 1. dated 2nd September, 2019 by which the property bearing No.J-5/134-135, Second Floor, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi was put to sale through e-auction with a reserve price of Rs. 81,00,000/-, and a sale proclamation was issued. It is submitted by counsels appearing today that the auction proceedings were conducted and there was only one bidder, who submitted a bid of Rs. 82,00,000/- and he has deposited the said amount.2. The challenge raised by Mr. Sandeep Agarwal,...
Avm Oil Field Services vs.gail Gas Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~3 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2019 + ARB.P. 559/2019 AVM OIL FIELD SERVICES ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Wadhwa and Mr. Devanshu Chauhan, Advocates. GAIL GAS LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. A.C. Mishra and Mr. Ankit Chaturvedi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) for the appointment of an Arbitrator.2. The prayer made in the petition reads as under:-"a. Allow the present Petition and appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences inter- alia in respect of suspension and termination of the contract, forfeiting of the Bank Guarantee and withholding of the payments due and payable to the... Petitioner under the contract and other arbitral disputes which have arisen between the parties. b. Pass such other order as may deemed fair and equitable in the facts of the ca...
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.prateek Solanki & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7132019 & C.M. APPL.48802-48804/2019 + Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Date of decision:19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAINCY SAGAR & ANR Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, for respondent No.1. AND + LPA7172019 & C.M. APPL.49163-49165/2019 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus PRATEEK SOLANKI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, LPA713& 717/20...
Anil Vashisth vs.m/s Awaaz India Media P. Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Delivered on:19. h November, 2019 RFA9842019 ANIL VASHISTH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amit Swami, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through : None. M/S AWAAZ INDIA MEDIA P. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS YOGESH KHANNA, J.CM APPL No.49721/2019 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 08 days in refiling the appeal stands condoned. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL No.49720/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RFA9842019 & CM APPL No.49719/2019 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the ex parte judgment and decree dated 19.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-10/Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.11/2018 whereby the suit of the appellant for recovery of Rs.4.00 lac was RFA No.984/2019 Page 1 of 4 dismissed. Though, initia...
Jyoti Dubey vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 11.2019 CRL.REV.P. 198/2019 IN THE MATTER OF: JYOTI DUBEY Through:... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Versus Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State THE STATE & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI ........ RESPONDENTS MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed assailing the impugned 1. order dated 26.11.2018 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.205/2017.2. A perusal of the record show that the petitioner was convicted vide order dated 02.11.2017 and vide order on sentence dated 03.11.2017, the petitioner was sentenced to pay a fine of 3,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. It was further directed that out of fine amount, the amount of 1,70,000/- shall be payable to the complainant as compensation.3. The petitioner preferred a Criminal Appeal No.205/2017 which was listed for the first time on 22.1...
Raj Kumar @ Rajji & Anr vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2019
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5871/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40592/2019 (stay) RAJ KUMAR @ RAJJI & ANR .....Petitioners Through Ms. Shalu, Adv. with petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State SI Ram Naresh, S.E. Distt. & SI Amit Prakash, PS Amar Colony Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40593/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5871/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.367/2016 dated 05.06.2016, registered at P.S. Amar Colony and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C5871/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2 who is present in person.6. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The petitioner no....
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »