Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mona Nanda vs.state Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~18. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 89/2019 MONA NANDA Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra and Ms. ........ Petitioner Manpreet Kaur, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2511.2019 IA No.16477/2019 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. TEST.CAS. 89/2019.3. The petitioner, being the wife of the deceased, seeks probate of a document pleaded to be the validly executed last Will of the deceased.4. The deceased is claimed to have left the respondents no.2 to 4 as his daughters and respondent no.5 as his brother. The respondent no.5, though not a natural heir, has been impleaded since bequest in his favour is stated to have been made under the document claimed to be the Will.5. Probate, vide Section 222 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 can be granted only to an executor appointed by the Will. There is no statement in the document ...
Anil Narang vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5872/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40600/2019 ANIL NARANG ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr. Nitin Mehta, Mr. Siddharth Satija, Mr. Harish Kumar Gupta, Mr. Gaurav Gupta and Mr. Arpit Rawat, Advs. versus STATE & ORS. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Insp. Narender Singh, Complaint Branch, North West District Dr. M. K. Gahlaut, Adv. for R-2&3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions as under:-"(i) To set aside the order dated 15.11.2019 passed by the Ld. Add., District & Session Judge, North West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi and order dated 14.11.2019 passed by Ms. Preeti Aggarwal Gupta, Ld. ASJ, Spl. FTC, Rohini Courts, in case FIR No.985/2015, Police Station Shalimar Bagh; CRL.M.C. 5872/2019 Page 1 of 14 (ii) Direct the trial to be conducted by the Ld. ASJ, Special Fast Track...
Neeraj Sharma vs.state of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2150/2018 and CRL.M.A. 41114/2019 NEERAJ SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Ahuja, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Vijay Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar Mr. complainant/ R-2 Suri, Adv. Sanjay for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.36/2018 dated 14.01.2018 registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, District Rohini, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC.2. Case of the petitioner as averred in the present petition is that the complainant started the work from September, 2009 and did not complete the same within 8 months and left the construction work in between and went to Bombay and thereafter Smt. Sneh Lata Sharma got the work BAIL APPLN. 2150/2018 Page 1 of 13 completed in 2013 af...
Tata Communications Ltd vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved:26. h July, 2019 Judgement Pronounced:25. November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2130/2014 TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD ... Petitioner Through : Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ajit Warrier, Mr.Aditya Nayyar and Mr.Varun Byreddy, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. Through : Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Adv. for R-1 and ... RESPONDENTS Jain, Advocate R-6. Mr.Yeeshu LAC/L&B. Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.B.L.Wali, Adv. for DMRC/R-5. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present writ petition had been originally filed by the... Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India primarily seeking the following reliefs: the Notification a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of, striking down and quashing bearing no.F9/11/L&B/LA/MRTS/9786, dated 13.09.2013 issued under Section 4 read with Section 17(1) and 17(4) of t...
Narcotics Control Bureau vs.lee Wei Qi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 31/2016 Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2019 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU versus LEE WEI QI .....Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Subhash Bansal, Standing Counsel, : NCB with Mr Shashwat Bansal, Advocate : for NCB. : Mr Maninder Singh, Mr Dinhar Takiar and : Mr Sarthak Garg, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a 1. judgment dated 22.11.2014 passed by the learned Special Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi acquitting the respondent in a complaint case filed under section 20(b)(ii)(C) and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter NDPS Act) for possession and attempt to export of 7 kg of Hashish recovered from check-in baggage of the respondent( accused).2. The case set up by prosecution is as under: CRL.A. 916/2016 Page 1 of 22 The prosecution cl...
Kailash Chand Dixit vs.madhu L Bhojwani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:21. t November, 2019 Decided on :25. h November, 2019 + RFA9172018 KAILASH CHAND DIXIT MADHU L BHOJWANI Through : Mr.Bipin Kr Jha, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant Through : Mr.U.M.Tripathi, ..... Respondent Mr.Anupam CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Mishra, Advocates. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the order /judgment dated 16.08.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge/South-West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.256/2018 whereby the suit of the appellant for specific performance, declaration and permanent injunction was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, being barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC.2. The appellant filed the aforesaid suit on 17.03.2018 in respect of the plot bearing No.18, admeasuring 200 square yards falling in Khasra No.40/4/2, in the area of Village Hastsal now known as Defence Enclav...
Preeti Dabas vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~63 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5999/2019 Date of decision:25. 11.2019 PREETI DABAS Through... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State Ms. Sakhi Sachdeva with Mr. Akshay Kumar, Advs. for R-2 SI Naresh Kumar, PS Neb Sarai with ASI Jitender, PS Kanjhawala ASI Gordhan Singh, PCR Zone, New Delhi Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41084/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5999/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.189/2015 dated 12.02.2015, registered at PS Prashant CRL.M.C. 5999/2019 Page 1 of 3 Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petitio...
Shamait Kumar Tomar & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5976/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40984/2019-Stay SHAMAIT KUMAR TOMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Dhananjai Rana, Mr. Vipin Yadav, Advocate for petitioner No.1 and 2 versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ASI Dharambir Sharma, PS Gandhi Nagar, Delhi Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 40985/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.A. 40986/2019 3. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5976/2019 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C59762019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.301/2016 dated 15.07.2016, registered at PS Gandhi Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for th...
Amir Ameen vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :14. 11.2019 Pronounced on :25. 11.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2767/2019 MOMEEN ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. + BAIL APPLN. 2769/2019 AMIR AMEEN ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. Bail Appln. Nos. 2767/2019, 2769/2019 & 2770/2019 Page 1 of 6 + BAIL APPLN. 2770/2019 TAQVEEM ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER1 By this common order, I shall dispose of three bail applications bearing No.2767/2019, 2769/2019 and 2770/2019...
M/S. Vikram Bike Zone Private Limited vs.m/s. Suzuki Motor Cycle India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~38 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h November, 2019 + ARB.P. 575/2019 M/S. VIKRAM BIKE ZONE PRIVATE LIMITED,........ Petitioner Through Ms. Vandana Sinha, Advocate. versus M/S. SUZUKI MOTOR CYCLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.12621/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions Application is disposed of. ARB.P. 575/2019 and I.A. 12620/2019 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that Arbitral Tribunal has already been constituted and the next date of hearing is fixed for 10th January, 2020. She further submits the proceedings were earlier held on 23rd November, 2019 but the petitioner did not attend the said proceedings. ARB.P. 575/2019 Page 1 of 2 Learned counsel for the respondent has handed over a copy of the order sheet of the Proceedings held before the Arbitral Tribunal on 23rd November, 2019 to the learned counsel for...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »