Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Taqveem vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :14. 11.2019 Pronounced on :25. 11.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2767/2019 MOMEEN ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. + BAIL APPLN. 2769/2019 AMIR AMEEN ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. Bail Appln. Nos. 2767/2019, 2769/2019 & 2770/2019 Page 1 of 6 + BAIL APPLN. 2770/2019 TAQVEEM ........ Petitioner STATE Through Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlwat, APP for State with ASI Pavinder Kumar. Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER1 By this common order, I shall dispose of three bail applications bearing No.2767/2019, 2769/2019 and 2770/2019...
M/S National Machinery Stores & Anr. Vs.sushil Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2019 RC.REV. 143/2019 & CM APPL.11147/2019 & 11148/2019 M/S NATIONAL MACHINERY STORES & ANR........ Petitioners SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Akash Kumar, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioners impugn order dated 25.04.2018 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has not placed on record complete copy of the eviction petition. Complete copy of the eviction petition has been handed over in Court today. Same is taken on record.3. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent under RC.REV. 143/2019 Page 1 of 4 section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of bo...
Dr. Ravi Prakash Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2916/2019 DR. RAVI PRAKASH VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41008/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2916/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner/ accused seek direction thereby to grant bail in FIR No.281/2019 dated 12.10.2019 registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 328/376/506 IPC.4. Case of the prosecution is that the complainant has studied B. Pharma and in the month of December, 2017, while she was working with Walter BAIL APPLN. 2916/2019 Page 1 of 5 Bushnell Company, she was sent to Safdarjung Hospital on behalf of the company as she was the Field Sales Manager. Her job w...
Bayant Singh & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6002/2019 BAYANT SINGH & ORS Through Mr. Amit Gaba, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Rajbir singh, PS Paschim Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41088/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6002/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.708/2016 dated 14.12.2016 registered at Police Station Sultan Puri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6002/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 21.11.2017 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitione...
Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Limited (Earlier Known as Irb Tumkur Ch ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 25, 2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 270/2019 IRB TUMKUR CHITRADURGA TOLLWAY LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS IRB TUMKUR CHITRADURGA TOLLWAY PRIVATE LIMITED) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Mr. Parthiv Goswami, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Mr. Ishan Bisht, Mrs. Teresa.R. Daulat and Mr. Mohnish Patkar, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankur Mittal and Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act of 1996, in short) with the following prayers: It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: A. Stay the operation and effect of the Letter dated 7th August, 2019 of the Respondent whereby the Respondent has purported to revoke / withdraw the OMP (I) ...
The State (Nct of Delhi) vs.amit Goswami
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 583/2016 Reserved on :20. 11.2019 Date of Decision :25. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: CRL.REV.P. 583-2016 THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Amit Kumar, ASI Suresh Kumar, P.S. New Usman Pur. Versus Through: Mr. Rabindra Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent AMIT GOSWAMI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present revision petition has been filed assailing the impugned order of discharge dated 29.01.16 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.142/2010 under Sections 3IPC P.S. New Usmanpur. Initially, vide order dated 05.06.13, the respondent was charged under Sections 3IPC along with another co-accused Jitender Giri.2. The prosecution case, as noted in the impugned order, is reproduced hereinunder :-"On 01.05.2010, on the statement of the injured Ramesh Jain FIR bearing No.142/2010 was registered PS New CRLREV.P. 583/2016 Page 1 of 5 Usmanpur. It was alleged by the ...
Manoj Saxena vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5986/2019 MANOJ SAXENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Mishra and Mr. Saurabh versus Balwani, Advs. STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with ASI Ramesh Chand/ IO and SI Shubhendu Sharma, PS Sarojini Nagar R-2 and 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41045/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5986/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.812/2014 dated 17.12.2014, registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.5986/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the ...
d.s. Kauntae vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9778/2018 D.S. KAUNTAE Through: versus... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC with Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Adv. for R-1 and R-4 to R-7 Mr. Vijender Pal Singh, Adv. for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT1 This so-called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred against a society which is registered unauthorizedly and illegally as alleged by this petitioner. Several allegations have been levelled against a society which is already registered since several years but the said society is not joined as party respondent for the reasons best known to the petitioner.2. In view of the aforesaid facts, we hereby dismiss this writ petition for want of impleading necessary party/respondent, reserving liberty with this petitioner to ...
National Highways Authority of India vs.ssangyong Engineering & Constr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h November, 2019 % + O.M.P. (COMM) 473/2019 & I.As. 15744-15747/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankur Chhibber and Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Advs. versus SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Navin Kumar Sinha, Ms.Rashmeet Kaur, Ms.Arpana Majumdar and Ms.Priya Goyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) I.As. 15746-15747/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 473/2019, I.As. 15744/2019 & 15745/2019 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (Act of 1996, for short) is to an award / interim award dated May 18, 2019 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal whereby the Arbitral Tribunal has allowed the application filed by the respondent herein for grant of two amou...
Anurag Sanghi vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:25.11.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3422/2018 &CRL.M.A. 35858/2018 ANURAG SANGHI versus STATE & ORS .....Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl) for State with SI Mr Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr Rajan Bajaj, Ms Sowjhanya, Mr Vishwajeet and Mr Lau Dhawan, Advocates. Shashi Dixit, PS Bawana. Mr R.K. Tarun and Mr Sumit Kumar, Advocates for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. for quashing of FIR No.431/2018, under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter the Copyright Act), registered with P.S Bawana, and all proceedings emanating therefrom. The facts that have given rise to the present controversy are 2. briefly stated below: W.P.(CRL) 3422/2018 Page 1 of 20 2.1. Respondent No.2 (hereafter Knit Pro) is a company engaged in manufact...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »