Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neetu Bhandari & Ors. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 11.2019 W.P.(CRL) 3582/2018 and CRL.M.A. 47963/2018 % + NEETU BHANDARI & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the petitioners: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Ashish Virmani, Mr Pallav Mongia, Mr Sarvpreet Advocates. and Mr Singh Saksham, For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms Jyoti Babbar and Mr Peeyush Singhal, Advocate. SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Narela. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. praying that FIR No.311/2018, under Sections 323/3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) registered with PS Narela and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed. The petitioners further pray that directions be issued to ensure the safety and security of the petitioners from anti-social elements, including respondent nos. 2 and 3. In addition, the petitione...
Neetu Sharma & Anr. Vs.ved Prakash Khaneja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 211/2017 Judgment delivered on:26. 11.2019 NEETU SHARMA & ANR versus VED PRAKASH KHANEJA ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Anand Maheshwari, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Dhruv Mr. K.R. Chawla with Mr. Vijay Chawla and Mr. Chawla, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 20.10.2016, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from first floor and barsati floor of Property No.820/III Katra Ghee, Tilak Bazar, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition. RC.R...
Ravi Kumar vs.harminder Singh Chowdhary & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:26. 11.2019 + RC.REV. 670/2019 RAVI KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus HARMINDER SINGH CHOWDHARY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Kanack Pandey, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Advocate with... RESPONDENTS in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CM APPL. 50916/2019 (Exemption) CM APPL. 50918/2019 (Exemption) Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CAV11652019 Since learned counsel for the respondent/caveator has entered appearance, caveat stands discharged. RC.REV.670/2019 Page 1 of 3 RC.REV. 670/2019 & CM APPL. 50917/2019 (stay), CM APPL.50919/2019 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.08.2019, whereby, eviction petition filed by the respondents on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the...
Saurabh Bindal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2019 Through... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner SAURABH BINDAL + W.P.(C) 9793/2018 versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Tushar Matur, Adv. for respondent nos. 1 to 3 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2611.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers: (i) Pass a writ and/or any other order declaring Section 18(4) of the Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Layout Design Act, 2000 as violative of Article 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and hence unconstitutional and therefore void; (ii) Pass such further writ and/or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. W.P.(C) 9793/2018 Page 1 of 2 2.... Petitioner who is appearing in person, is an Advocate, submitted tha...
Ajeet Sood vs.the Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2019
$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7412019 and CM Nos. 50907, 50908/2019 Date of decision:26. h November, 2019 AJEET SOOD Through: Mr. Anilendra Pandey, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE COMMISSIONER, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel-North MCD CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2611.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.50908/2019 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. LPA7412019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner in W.P.(C) 7823/2019 which was disposed of by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 20th September, 2019 (Annexure A-7 to the memo of this appeal). LPA7412019 Page 1 of 3 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant (original petitioner) and looking at the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to entertain this L...
Sh. Rajan Bery vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h November, 2019 % + TEST.CAS. 67/2011 SH. RAJAN BERY Through: Ms. Veena Goswami and Mr. Shashwat Goel, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14240/2019 .... Respondent 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the Honble Court may be pleased to: (a) Reduce the valuation of the property No.B-67, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi- 110028 as done by the concerned SDM, Delhi Cantt. to 50% as per the Clause 5(a) of sub para 3 of the lease deed, and not the petitioner / applicant to deposit the court fee upon the reduced valuation of the property. Test Case 67/2011 Page 1 of 4 (b) Pass such other Order(s) as this Honble Court may deem fit. AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE APPLICANT/PETITIONER AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY. 2...
Ramesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2019 CRL.A. 140/2016 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1604/2019 % + RAMESH versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Mr Dinesh Malik, Advocate (DHCLSC). For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 15.12.2015 passed by ASJ, FTC, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 326A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for throwing acid and causing burn injuries to two persons. The appellant also impugns the order on sentence dated 16.12.2015, whereby the appellant was sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment and was imposed a fine of 35,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months. CRL. A. 140/2016 Page 1 of ...
Ujjwal Kapoor vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h November, 2019 TEST.CAS. 84/2016 UJJWAL KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Suresh K. Beri, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ayushi Chaudhary for Ms. Niddhi Raman, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Udai Rathore, Advs. For R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition (i) under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate in respect of the last Will of the deceased Man Mohan Lal Khanna, S/o Late Shri I.D. Khanna, R/o A-1/287, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110 029; and, (ii) under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of Letters of Administration of properties of the deceased Man Mohan Lal Khanna in respect of which no bequest has been made in the Will, is ripe for final hearing.2. The deceased Man Mohan Lal Khanna, Hindu by religion, is pleaded to have died on 18th March, 2016 leaving a Will dated 16th April, 2012, executed o...
Nishant Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~53 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5972/2019 NISHANT SHARMA Date of decision:25. 11.2019 STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Yogesh Kumar, ASI Nagar Singh, PS Subzi Mandi, Delhi Mr. Deepak Mehar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40971/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5972/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.117/2017 dated 19.05.2017, registered at PS Subzi Mandi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 5972/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for fina...
Siddhant Choudhary vs.toasha Agencies & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h November, 2019 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 264/2019 SIDDHANT CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Samar Singh Kachwaha, Adv. with Mr.Raghavendra M.Bajaj, Mr.Sanskar Agarwal, Advs. versus TOASHA AGENCIES & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Rohan Gupta, Mr.Dipank Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been preferred by the original defendant against the stay granted in IA No.13185/2016 in CS(COMM) 1441/2016 vide order dated 24th July, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge.2. Having heard the counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that CS(COMM) 1441/2016 is pending before the learned Single Judge and hence, we are not going into the fine niceties of the facts. Too much dissection of the facts is not required at this stage otherwise the observa...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »