Delhi Court November 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 27 2019

Abhijit Mishra vs.office of the District & Sessions Judge (South)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 11.2019 + W.P.(C) 2534/2019 ABHIJIT MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Payal Bahl, Adv. along with petitioner-in-person. versus OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE (SOUTH) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan with Ms. Shivani Pruthi, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs. for R-2/DHC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following 1. prayers:-"a) Writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions to the Respondent to take cognizance of the plight of the prospective applicants in terms of fairness for the selection of the position of the Local Commissioners by making suitable amendments in the criteria of the selection process; b) any other order or directions as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

National Bal Bhawan vs.uma Sharma

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

* % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2019 W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & CM APPL. 41509/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus VANDANA W.P.(C) 10050/2019 & CM APPL. 41579/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ROOPA SHARMA W.P.(C) 10056/2019 & CM APPL. 41590/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus RAJ BALA W.P.(C) 10058/2019 & CM APPL. 41594/2019 ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN versus RENUKA AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 10059/2019 & CM APPL. 41597/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus SHAILAJA SHARMA ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 10027/2019 & conn. matters Page 1 of 9 + W.P.(C) 10060/2019 & CM APPL. 41600/2019 NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus ANJALI BINDRA W.P.(C) 10066/2019 & CM APPL. 41612/2019 + ..... Respondent NATIONAL BAL BHAWAN ........ Petitioner versus UMA SHARMA ..... Respondent Present: Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate with Mr. R...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

Vikash Kumar Sharma vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * BAIL APPLN. 1607/2019 Reserved on :22. 11.2019 Date of Decision :27. 11.2019 VIKASH KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, Advocate Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State.1. The present application has been filed seeking regular bail in FIR No.37/2016 registered under Sections 489B/489C/120B IPC and Sections 15(a) (iii a) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,1967, at Police Station Special Cell, Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2016. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid FIR. It is submitted that the prosecution, in support of its case, has relied on the CDR details between Baljinder Singh, Manga Singh and Vishnu. It is also submitted that the prosecution has only relied upon the CDR details and there is no conversatio...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

Akash Sirmane Pariyar vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

$~52 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C.6034/2019 Date of decision:27. 11.2019 AKASH SIRMANE PARIYAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ahmad Waseem, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Nassu Ahmad, PS Shaheen Bagh Mr. Srikant Mishra, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41232/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6034/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.90/2019, dated 14.05.2019 registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, for the offence punishable under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6034/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the p...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

State vs.dr. Sharda Nayak

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4551/2018 and Crl.M.A.31631/2018, 35622- 35623/2018, 5574/2019 SALMAN KHURSHID ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aadil Singh Boparai, Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal, Mr. Shivanshu Singh & Mr. Prithvi Narula, Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Advocates along with petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Amar Colony Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vasudha Bajaj & Mr. A.Gupta, Advocates for R-5. + CRL.M.C. 5069/2018 and Crl.M.A.33507/2018 S.R VAISH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Advocate with Mr. Nitin Saluja, Mr. Mudit Gupta, Mr. Varun Singh, Mr. Aman Panwar, Mr. Akshay, & Mr. Harsh G. Advocates versus Crl. M.C. 4551/2018 & ors. Page 1 of 31 STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meen...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

Khushi Seva Sansthan vs.deputy Commissioner South Zone Municipal Corpo ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 11.2019 + W.P. (C) No.1169/2018 KHUSHI SEVA SANSTHAN Through: Proxy counsel. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SOUTH ZONE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. Through: Mr. Surender Kumar Sharma & Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocates for SDMC. Mr. Anjum Javed, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Devendra Kumar, Mr. Faran Ahmed & Ms. Priti, Advocates for R-2. Insp. Rakesh Rawat & SI Amar Singh, PS R.K. Puram. Mr. S.S. Sastry, Mr. Ankur Gosian & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advs. for the applicant. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred for the following prayers :-"a) Direct to the respondents the unauthorized and illegal constructed shops situated at Sector-4, near Jain Mandir, R.K. Puram, New Delhi and also prevent them to re-encroachment upon the said Government land. remove/demolish 2. Having heard the coun...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs.shri Malvinder Mohan ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

$~63 & 64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:27. h November, 2019 CRL.M.C. 6018/2019 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr.Nitish Rana, SPP, Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Mr.Ali Khan and Mr.A.R.Aditya, Advs. along with Ms.Smriti Tripathi, Deputy Director and Mr.Rahul Verma, IO/AD/ED .... Respondent Versus SHRI SUNIL GODHWANI Through Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr.Rajat Katyal, Mr.Naunidh S. Arora, Mr.Ajay Tusheer and Mr.Karan Jain, Advs. CRL.M.C. 6019/2019 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr.Nitish Rana, SPP, Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Mr.Ali Khan and Mr.A.R.Aditya, Advs. along with Ms.Smriti Tripathi, Deputy Director and Mr.Rahul Verma, IO/AD/ED Versus + Crl.M.C.6018-19/2019 Page 1 of 12 SHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH Through Mr. Manu Sharma, Ms.Ridhima .... Respondent Mandhar, Mr.Kartik Khanna, and Mr.Vijay Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019

Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors vs.girish Chandra Sharma

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2019 Decided on:27. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 7367/2009 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawant, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. versus CHANDER MUKH GAUBA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Mr. Varun Kalra, Advocate. AND W.P.(C) 7372/2009 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawant, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. versus GIRISH CHANDRA SHARMA .... Respondent Through: Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Mr. Varun Kalra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Government of NCT of Delhi has filed both these petitions W.P(C)7367/2009 and 7372/2009 Page 1 of 13 challenging a common order dated 29th September, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). While WP(C) No.7367/2009 is directed against the ord...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2019