Skip to content

Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 01 2019

State of Nct of Delhi vs.mukesh Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :26. 08.2019 % Pronounced on :01. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4176/2019 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel, Ms. Jyoti Babbar Adv., ACP Naresh Kumar-OPS Central, Inspector Rajeev Gunwant- SHO-PS IP Estate, Inspector Ashok Kumar-IO/Inspector Narcotics. Versus MUKESH KUMAR ....... RESPONDENTS Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER CRL.M.C. 4176/2019 & CRL. M.A. No.34227/2019 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition with the prayer to set aside the directions passed by Additional Session Judge-03, Central District, Tis Hazari Court Delhi vide order dated 14.08.2019 in case FIR No.22/2019 U/s 420/467/468/471 and 120-B IPC registered at P.S. IP Estate. CRL.M.C. 4176/2019 Page 1 of 29 2. The facts relevant are that on 18.09.2015 a complaint was filed by Dr. Y.K. Sarin, Medical Superintendent, Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi. O...


Oct 01 2019

Dr. Alok Bhandari & Anr. Vs.vishnu Dutt Tewari

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2019 RC.REV. 386/2019 & CM APPL. 29004/2019 DR. ALOK BHANDARI & ANR. versus VISHNU DUTT TEWARI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishabh Wadhwa and Mr. Raghav Goyal, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Ashok Anand and Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners who are owners/landlord of the subject property impugn order dated 12.03.2019 whereby leave to defend was granted to the respondents.2. The subject eviction petitions were filed by the respondents on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction from shop No.3, H-4, Ground Floor, Main Market, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-110027 more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to RC.REV. 386/2019 Page 1 of 11 the evic...


Oct 01 2019

Suresh Kapoor vs.shashi Krishanlal Khanna & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 01, 2019 CS(OS) 236/2010, I.As. 5415/2011, 23113/2014 & 14315/2016 SURESH KAPOOR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh and Mr. Shamik Saha, Advs. versus SHASHI KRISHANLAL KHANNA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Mr. Swayam Sidha and Mr. Pranav Mundra, Advs. for D-1 Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Adv. for D-2 & D-3 Mr. S. Sartanam Swaminathan and Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Advs. for D-7 & D-8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14315/2016 1. By this order I shall dispose of this application filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of the plaint. Vide the said amendment the plaintiff intends to amend / replace paragraph 27(i) of the plaint in the following manner: IA143152016 in CS(OS) 236/2010 Page 1 of 8 27(i) For the relief of partition of the suit property, the suit is valued at 13,03,27,088/- (Rs....


Oct 01 2019

Vasu Dev Monga vs.registrar General Delhi High Court

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~24, 25, 29, 34, 35 and 41 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10592/2019 NISHANT BASOYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sagar S.Jaiswal with Mr.Nivesh Sharma, Mr.Kirti Gupta and Ms.Ritu Singh, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High Court. W.P.(C) 10692/2019 ANU KUMARI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prashant Manchanda with Mr.Mohit Saroha, Mr.Mohit Siwach and Mr.Rakshit Pandey, Advocates along with... Petitioners in person . versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High W.P.(C) 10592/2019 and connected matters Page 1...


Oct 01 2019

Laxmi College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education a ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h September, 2019 Pronounced on:1. t October, 2019 + W.P. (C) 7666/2019 and CM No.31863/2019 LAXMI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION .Petitioner Versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. .Respondents W.P. (C) 6417/2019 and CM No.27264/2019 W.P. (C) 6438/2019 and CM No.27341/2019 W.P. (C) 7050/2019 and CM No.29407/2019 W.P. (C) 7354/2019 and CM No.30646/2019 W.P. (C) 7572/2019 W.P. (C) 7664/2019 and CM No.31861/2019 W.P. (C) 7665/2019 and CM No.31862/2019 W.P. (C) 7856/2019 and CM No.32668/2019 W.P. (C) 7858/2019 and CM No.32671/2019 W.P. (C) 7867/2019 and CM No.32684/2019 W.P. (C) 7869/2019 and CM No.32689/2019 W.P. (C) 7870/2019 and CM No.32694/2019 W.P. (C) 7871/2019 and CM No.32695/2019 W.P. (C) 7872/2019 and CM No.32696/2019 W.P. (C) 7873/2019 and CM No.32697/2019 W.P. (C) 7875/2019 and CM No.32704/2019 W.P. (C) 7908/2019 and CM No.32769/2019 W.P. (C) 8244/2019 W.P. (C) 8863/2019 W.P. (C) 9676/2019 + + + + + + + + + + + +...


Oct 01 2019

Darshan Mohan Singh Nanda & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5025/2019 Date of decision:01.10.2019 DARSHAN MOHAN SINGH NANDA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Karan Babuta and Ms. Astha versus Gupta, Advs. STATE & ORS. Through: Mr.Tarang Shrivastava, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Vikas, PS Hari Nagar Mr. Ravinder Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Garg, Advs. for R-2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 37423/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of.1. 2. CRL.M.C. 5025/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.356/2009 dated 18.11.2009 registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, New Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5025/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is ...


Oct 01 2019

Anu Kumari and Ors. Vs.registrar General Delhi High Court

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~24, 25, 29, 34, 35 and 41 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10592/2019 NISHANT BASOYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sagar S.Jaiswal with Mr.Nivesh Sharma, Mr.Kirti Gupta and Ms.Ritu Singh, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High Court. W.P.(C) 10692/2019 ANU KUMARI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prashant Manchanda with Mr.Mohit Saroha, Mr.Mohit Siwach and Mr.Rakshit Pandey, Advocates along with... Petitioners in person . versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High W.P.(C) 10592/2019 and connected matters Page 1...


Oct 01 2019

State of Nct of Delhi vs.dharambir & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :26. 08.2019 % Pronounced on :01. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4174/2019 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel, Ms. Jyoti Babbar Adv., ACP Naresh Kumar-OPS Central, Inspector Rajeev Gunwant- SHO-PS IP Estate, Inspector Ashok Kumar-IO/Inspector Narcotics. Versus DHARAMBIR & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER CRL.M.C. 4174/2019 & CRL. M.A. No.34223/2019 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition with the prayer to set aside the directions passed by Additional Session Judge-03, Central District, Tis Hazari Court Delhi vide order dated 14.08.2019 in case FIR No.22/2019 U/s 420/467/468/471 and 120-B IPC registered at P.S. IP Estate. CRL.M.C. 4174/2019 Page 1 of 29 2. The facts relevant are that on 18.09.2015 a complaint was filed by Dr. Y.K. Sarin, Medical Superintendent, Lok Nayak Hospital, Delh...


Oct 01 2019

Colonel Ramesh Pal Singh vs.sughandhi Aggarwal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:21. t August, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:1. t October, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 211/2017 & CM APPL. 44390/2017 COLONEL RAMESH PAL SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Nitya Ramakrishnan with Ms.Warisha Farasat, Mr.Saurabh D. Karan, Mr.Karan and Ms.Kanika Jain, Advocates with appellant in person Singh Versus SUGHANDHI AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate and with Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 The appellant/husband is aggrieved by the order dated 16.10.2017 passed by the Family Courts on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as G & W Act). By way of the impugned order the Family Courts granted the custody of both the children to the Respondent after the completi...


Oct 01 2019

Vijay Prasad Nautiyal & Ors vs.the State of n.c.t of Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~41 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5050/2019 Date of decision:01. 10.2019 VIJAY PRASAD NAUTIYAL & ORS Through: Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State THE STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT ASI Ombir Singh, PS R. K. Puram Adv. for R-2 Adv. (appearance not given) JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.As. 37498-500/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. These applications are, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5050/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.137/2014 dated 28.02.2014 registered at Police Station Dabri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the CRL.M.C. 5050/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial