Skip to content

Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 01 2019

M/S Mahindra and Mahindra Limited vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~26 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :1. t October, 2019 M/S MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anand Shankar Jha, Mr. Puneet Dhir & Ms. Manisha Mehta, Advocates. versus + W.P.(C) 8589/2019 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. CORAM: Through Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for R-1 & R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 39504/2019 (delay in filing rejoinder) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/petitioner under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay of 7 days in filing the rejoinder.2. The prayer made in the application is not opposed. Delay of 7 days in filing the rejoinder is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8589/2019 & CM APPL. 40723/2019 (stay) 4. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...


Oct 01 2019

Kiran Jain vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 07.2019 Pronounced on:01.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 10549/2018 & CM No.41174/2018 KIRAN JAIN Through Mr. A.P.S.Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate ........ Petitioner with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit Bangwal, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Meenakshi Midha with Mr. Kapil Midha and Ms. Abhivandana Chowdhury, Advocates for Respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the orders/letters dated 10.08.2018 and 18.08.2018 issued by the respondent nos.2&3, terminating the appointment of petitioner as TGT (Hindi) and further seeks directions to the respondents thereby allowing the petitioner to continue in service as TGT (Hindi), being duly selected and appointed for the said post in respondent no.3/school.... Petitioner also seeks directions for W.P.(C) 10549/2018 Page 1 of 29 the respondents to pay the salary to th...


Oct 01 2019

Shreya Gupta vs.the Registrar General, Delhi High Court

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~24, 25, 29, 34, 35 and 41 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10592/2019 NISHANT BASOYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sagar S.Jaiswal with Mr.Nivesh Sharma, Mr.Kirti Gupta and Ms.Ritu Singh, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High Court. W.P.(C) 10692/2019 ANU KUMARI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prashant Manchanda with Mr.Mohit Saroha, Mr.Mohit Siwach and Mr.Rakshit Pandey, Advocates along with... Petitioners in person . versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High W.P.(C) 10592/2019 and connected matters Page 1...


Oct 01 2019

Ishan Chopra vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5023/2019 Date of decision:01.10.2019 ISHAN CHOPRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan and Mr. Apar in Chopra, Advs. with petitioner person versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State. Inspector Usha Sharma, SI Naveen (IO), PS North Rohini Mr. Sanjay Goel and Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 37413/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of.1. 2. CRL.M.C. 5023/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.164/2016 dated 11.03.2016, registered at Police Station North Rohini and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5023/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the pr...


Oct 01 2019

Dilshad Ali vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

Through: Mr Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Sarvan Kumar Shukla, Mr Mohit Bhardwaj and Mr Mukesh Pandey, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P.(C) 3232/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~9 * + DILSHAD ALI ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus ORDER0110.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This writ petition challenges an order dated 27th July, 2018, issued by the Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIGP), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Hyderabad, inter alia, directing a deduction of a sum of Rs.2,80,275/- from the... Petitioner.2. The... Petitioner also challenges the proposal dated 8th March, 2018, for revision of the... Petitioners pension consequent upon the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission (CPC), which reflects the deductions of the aforementioned sum, while calculating the revised pension payable to the... Petitioner. The... Petitioner consequent...


Oct 01 2019

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs.joint Venture of M/S Sai Rama ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 09.2019 Pronounced on:01. 10.2019 $~ * % + O.M.P. (COMM) 97/2019 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. Through: Mr. Amitesh Mishra, Mr. Gunjan Arora, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus JOINT VENTURE OF M/S SAI RAMA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES (SREE) & M/S MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (MEIL) Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan, Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.I.A. No.4451/2019 (Delay 27 days in filing) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 27 days in filing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging an Award dated 23.10.2018 of the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes between the parties.2. When the petition was listed on 13.03.2019, the respondent had raised a preliminary objection that the petition is barred by limitation as provided under Section 34(3) of the Act. He submitted that v...


Oct 01 2019

Sh. Pushpender Singh Chawla vs.commissioner Employees Compensation Act ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10696/2019 & C.M. No.44209/2019 Date of Decision :-"01.10.2019 SH. PUSHPENDER SINGH CHAWLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Aditya Singh with Ms.Deepti Singh Sodhi & ms.Mehak Nakra, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kaustubh Anshu Rai, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition assails the order dated 02.08.2019 passed by the Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) rejecting the petitioners application dated 05.03.2019 filed under Sections 12 and 13 of the Act seeking recovery of Rs.12,00,641/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from respondent no.2 i.e. the contractor.2. The petitioner and respondent no.2/contractor had entered into a property development agreement for construction of a residential WP (C) No.10696/2019 Page 1 of 5 house at A-57, ...


Oct 01 2019

Vikas Sharma & Ors vs.registrar General, Delhi High Court & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~24, 25, 29, 34, 35 and 41 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10592/2019 NISHANT BASOYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sagar S.Jaiswal with Mr.Nivesh Sharma, Mr.Kirti Gupta and Ms.Ritu Singh, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High Court. W.P.(C) 10692/2019 ANU KUMARI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prashant Manchanda with Mr.Mohit Saroha, Mr.Mohit Siwach and Mr.Rakshit Pandey, Advocates along with... Petitioners in person . versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High W.P.(C) 10592/2019 and connected matters Page 1...


Oct 01 2019

Ravinder Nath Sahni vs.bses Yamuna Power Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~A-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:01. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 4955/2016 & CM APPL. 20599/2016 RAVINDER NATH SAHNI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ajay Jain, Mr.Vikrant Singh and Mr.Devansh Gupta, Advs. versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Manish Kumar Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the illegal demand of the respondent/BSES requiring the petitioner to clear the electricity dues of Rs.2,45,420/-.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner and is in possession of the property bearing No.C-295, Suraj Mal Vihar, Delhi- 110092. The same was gifted to him by his father vide Gift Deed dated 03.03.2014.3. Prior to 2014, the petitioner was residing on the ground floor and became the owner of the said property vide aforementioned gift deed. On 11.3.2016 the petitioner was given...


Oct 01 2019

Sher Ali @ Iran & Anr vs.the State & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2019

$~40 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5046/2019 Date of decision:01. 10.2019. SHER ALI @ IRAN & ANR Through: Mr. R. K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for State SI Ravinder, PCR Central Zone. SI Dharmendra, PS Ranjeet Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 37474/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5046/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.076/2017 dated 09.02.2017, registered at PS Ranjeet Nagar and consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C. 5046/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial