Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Alok Bhandari & Anr. Vs.dewan Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2019 RC.REV. 501/2016 & CM APPL. 38520/2016 DR. ALOK BHANDARI & ANR. DEWAN CHAND versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishabh Wadhwa and Mr. Raghav Goyal, Advocates For the Respondent: Ms. Sadhana Sharma, Advocate 501/2016) (RC REV. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners who are owners/landlord of the subject property impugn order dated 21.07.2016 whereby leave to defend the eviction petition was granted to the respondent.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondents on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction from shop No.2, H-4, Ground Floor, Main Market, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-110027 more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to the RC.REV. 501/2016 Page 1 o...
Nishant Basoya vs.registrar General, the High Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~24, 25, 29, 34, 35 and 41 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10592/2019 NISHANT BASOYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sagar S.Jaiswal with Mr.Nivesh Sharma, Mr.Kirti Gupta and Ms.Ritu Singh, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High Court. W.P.(C) 10692/2019 ANU KUMARI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prashant Manchanda with Mr.Mohit Saroha, Mr.Mohit Siwach and Mr.Rakshit Pandey, Advocates along with... Petitioners in person . versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr.Chaitanya Puri, Mr.Siddhant Nath, Mr.Abhay Pratap Singh, Mr.Areeb Y.Amanullah, Mr.Siddharth Raval and Ms.Rajshree Jaiswal, Advocates for Delhi High W.P.(C) 10592/2019 and connected matters Page 1...
Dr. Rajani Sinha vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)No.12477/2018 Judgment reserved on 13.09.2019 Judgment pronounced on 01.10.2019 DR. RAJANI SINHA Through : Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Adv. along ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. with petitioner. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advs. for R-1. Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Arunima Pal, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Sumangla, Ms.Michelle B. Das, Mr. Tarun Verma and Mr. Abijit Chakravarty, Advs. for R-2/MCI. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr.Rohan Anand, Advs. for NBE. Mr. Jaiwant Patankar, Ms. Sanbha Rumnong and Mr. Loreign Ovung, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:1. This writ petition is directed against the order/communication dated 05.10.2018 issued by respondent No.3 i.e. National Board of Examination (hereafter referred to as NBE). Via the impugned communication, NBE has indicated to the petitioner that her candidature for D...
Vivek Sharma & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 10.2019. + CRL.M.C. 5037/2019 VIVEK SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikrant Choudahry, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State Mr. Kishan Singh Chauhan, Adv. for R-2 SI S. Singh, PS Jaitpur, ASI Kunji Lal ASI Bhagwan Das, PS Jait Pur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 37445/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5037/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No 0146/2016 dated 23.03.2016 registered at Police Station Jaitpur and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5037/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and ...
Irfan Ul Haq & Ors. Vs.mohd. Ikram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2019 RC.REV. 410/2019 IRFAN UL HAQ & ORS versus MOHD IKRAM & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.S.D.Ansari and Mr.I.Ahmad, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.Sunil Dutt Dixit, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.30570/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CAV6812019 Learned counsel for the respondent/caveator has entered appearance. Caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 410/2019 & CM APPL.30569/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 02.04.2019, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an RC.REV. 410/2019 Page 1 of 4 eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from first floor of property bearing No.882, Ward- Xl, Gali Farshwali, Haveli Asam Kh...
Jitender Kumar vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA6512019 Date of decision:1. t October, 2019 ..... Appellant JITENDER KUMAR Through Mr. Puneet Garg, Adv. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER0110.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 44354/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. LPA No.651/2019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant (original petitioner), whose writ petition being W.P. (Crl.) No.2744/2019 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 24th September, 2019 (Annexure P-1 in the memo of this appeal), whereby prayer of the appellant for grant of parole within a period of six months from the earlier parole was not accepted by the learned Single Judge and hence, the appellant (original petitioner) has preferred the present Letters Patent A...
m.c.d. Vs.mahesh Chand & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2108/2003 Date of Decision :-"01.10.2019 M.C.D. Through: Ms.Namrata Mukim with Ms.Kashpi ........ Petitioner Agrawal, Advs. versus MAHESH CHAND & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Meghna De & Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the MCD assails the award dated 10.05.2002 passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal-I, Karkardooma Courts, Shahdara, Delhi. Under the impugned award, the learned Tribunal has after holding that the respondent no.1 had been wrongly deprived of his wages for the period between 01.03.1996 to 04.12.1996 directed the petitioner to pay the same with interest at the rate of 9%.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal was wholly unjustified in passing the impugned award by overlooking the WP (C) No.2108/2003 Page 1 of 4 fact that the respondent had in fact absented from duty between 01.03.1996 to 04.1...
Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd &Anr vs.naval Kishore Goyal &Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:1. tOctober, 2019 + CS(COMM) 292/2016 GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD &ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Tanya Varma and Ms. Eva Bishwal, Advocates. NAVAL KISHORE GOYAL &Ors. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashraf Yusuf Khan and Shambhu Saran Shukla, Advocates for Defendant NoS. 1 and 2 with Defendant No.2 CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present suit concerns Plaintiffs' statutory and common law proprietary rights over the trademark ZENTEL and violation thereof by the Defendants on account of use of a deceptively similar mark FENTEL for identical pharmaceutical preparation. CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF2 The case as set out in the plaint is that the Plaintiffs (together and through their subsidiaries/affiliates world-wide), are engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing a wide range of products, inter alia, CS (COMM.) 292/2016 Page 1 of 26 pharmaceutical and m...
Uttam Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5034/2019 UTTAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anees Anand, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Gaurav Saini, Adv. for R-2 SI Rajesh Kumar, PS Sarojini Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 37515/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5034/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.dated 06/01/2016, registered at PS Sarojini Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the CRL.M.C. 5034/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have...
Tanveer Ahmed vs.qureshia Begam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2019
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2019 RC.REV. 582/2016 & CM APPL.10997/2018 TANVEER AHMED versus QURESHIA BEGAM ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. R.L. Kohli, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Paunika Johar, Advocates for R-1(a) & (b) Mr. Lalit Gupta and Mr. Himank Ahuja, Advocate for R-1 (e) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.08.2016, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under RC.REV.582/2016 Page 1 of 3 Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one room/store on the ground floor along with right of comm...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »