Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.inderjit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) No.684/2013 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan,Adv. ........ Petitioner versus INDERJIT Through: Mr.G.S. Charya,Adv. ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 5325/2013 ........ Petitioner INDERJEET Through: Mr.G.S. Charya, Adv. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present decision disposes of two writ petitions; while WP(C) No.684/2013 preferred by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC)/Management assails the Award dated 31.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.331/08/1997, WP(C) No.5325/2013 preferred by the workman seeks a direction to the DTC to reinstate him with all consequential benefits. For the sake of convenience, the parties are WP(C) Nos.684/2013 & 5325/2013 Page 1 of 5 being referred to by their nomenclature in WP(C) No.684/2013.2. The respondent, while serving i...
Usha Narang vs.mahesh Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2019 RC.REV. 580/2019 & CM APPL. 43889/2019 USHA NARANG versus MAHESH KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Rajula, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Ravinder Mahil, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 04.06.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop (measuring 8 ft. x 4 ft.) situated at ground floor facing East side of property bearing No.2081, Veer Gali, Sadar Bazar, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the RC.REV.580/2019 Page 1 of 3 s...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.rinku Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~10 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:09. 10.2019 + MAC.APP. 815/2019, CM APPL. 44502/2019 & CM APPL. 44503/2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI RINKU DEVI & ORS Through: ........ RESPONDENTS NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 02.07.2019 passed by the learned MACT in New No.49365-16 on the ground that it has erred in not granting the right of recovery, despite the driving licence of the driver of the offending vehicle having been found to be fake in view of the evidence led by the insurer.2. The Court would note that the impugned order has dealt with the aforementioned issue elaborately, inasmuch as the owner had stated that he had seen the licence of the driver and tested the drivers driving skills before he was employed. The driving licence appeared to be genuine. But the vehicle owner went a step further, he had the drivin...
Shivaai Industries Private Limited vs.delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 262/2019 & C.M.Applns. 43434-36/2019 SHIVAAI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Grover, Mr. Tarang Agarwal and Ms. Cassandra Zosangiani, Advocates versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER0910.2019 C.M.Applns. 43435-36/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) (COMM) 262/2019 & C.M.Appln.43434/2019 (stay) 1. The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 29.07.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a petition filed by it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenging the Award dated 29.11.2017, pronounced by the learned Sole Arbitrator, adjudicating disputes that had arisen ...
Sushil Kumar vs.rama Mehta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2019 RC.REV. 285/2018 & CM APPL. 25577/2018, 46813/2018 SUSHIL KUMAR versus RAMA MEHTA & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Praveen Suri with Mr. Komal Chhibber, Advocates along with petitioner in person For the Respondent: Mr. Ashwini Mata, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Gaur, Advocate with Ms. Seema, respondent No.3 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 16.05.2018 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from one Shop on the South-West corner of the building bearing No.13/1, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, more particularly as shown in...
Man Mohan Pandey and Ors. Vs.bharat Electronics Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 REVIEW PET. 360/2019 and CM APPL. 39523/2019 (Stay) + in W.P.(C) 8188/2019 MAN MOHAN PANDEY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath and Mr. B.K. versus Pandey, Advs. BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Manish Paliwal, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. and Mr. B.V. Ramaiyya, DGM, Legal, BEL./ R-1 Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-2/UOI Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rohan Anand, Adv. and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, GP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to recall the order dated 31.07.2019 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.8188/2019.2. At the outset, it is pointed out that in Para 19 of order dated REVIEW PET. 360/2019 in W.P.(C) 8188/2019 Page 1 of 11 31.07.2019, it is recorded that the petitioners are above level E-VIII; howe...
M/S Gurunanak Fashion Studio Pvt. Ltd. Vs.north Delhi Municipal Corpor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h October, 2019 + CM(M) 1462/2019 M/S GURUNANAK FASHION STUDIO PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Makkar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajnish Ranjan, Mr. Shashwat V. Dubey, Ms. Shashi K. Gupta, Advocates (M-9610820492). versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel along with Mr. Avinash Gupta, AE (M-9212504099). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 4th October, 2019 wherein the... Petitioners prayer for ex-parte ad- interim stay was rejected by the ld. Trial Court. The apprehension of the... Petitioner is that the property bearing No.6/81, WEA Karol Bagh, New Delhi 110005 (hereinafter, suit property), is likely to be further demolished by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter, NrDMC), which has already carried out part demolition. Thus, interi...
Ritesh Properties & Industries Ltd vs.youtube Llc & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2019 CS(OS) 518/2019 RITESH PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gaurav Varma, Mr. Sujoy Datta and Mr. Surekh Baxy, Advs. YOUTUBE LLC & ORS. Versus Through: None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.13961/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) 518/2019 & IAs No.13959/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 13960/2019 & 13962/2019 (both u/S151CPC) 3. The plaintiff Ritesh Properties and Industries Limited has instituted this suit against (i) YouTube LLC, (ii) Google LLC and against unknown defendants impleaded as John Doe/Ashok, for (a) permanent injunction directing YouTube LLC and Google LLC to take down, remove and/or block/restrict access to the video/URLs/web links mentioned in paragraphs 8 and 10 of the plaint and claimed to have been uploaded by unknown defendants and alleged to be having content d...
M/S. Santur Construction & Finance (P) Ltd vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 3656/2016 M/S. SANTUR CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for R- LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter as the 2013 Act) that, the land acquisition proceedings in respect to land admeasuring 4 Bighas of land comprised in Khasra Nos. 12(0-16), 121/(1-0), 122 (0-4) & 123 (2-0), situated in revenue Estate of Village Satbari, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi, (hereinafter as subject land) acquired vide Award bearing No.14/1987-88 dated 26th May 1987, are deemed to have lapsed.2. The rel...
M/S Samman Construction & Finance (P) Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3646/2016 Date of Decision:09. 10.2019 M/S SAMMAN CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for R- 4 & 5. Ms. Rukmani Bobde and Ms. Shagufa Salim, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter as the 2013 Act) that, the land acquisition proceedings in respect to land admeasuring 4 Bighas of land comprised in Khasra Nos. 12(0-16), 121/(1-0), 122 (0-4) & 123 (2-0), situated in revenue Estate of Village Satbari, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi, (hereinafter as subject land) was acquired vide Award bearing No.14/1...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »