Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors. Vs.kiran Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 214/2015 & CM Appl.No.337/2015 (stay) Through Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. KIRAN SHARMA & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0910.2019 1. The Government of NCT of Delhi has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 28th January, 2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) disposing of OA No.2909/2012 filed by the... RESPONDENTS and directing that they should be paid salary on par with Welfare Officers appointed on contract basis.2. The background facts are that each of the 16... RESPONDENTS herein was appointed on various dates between 1st February, 2007 and 14th June, 2010 as Protection Officer (Women) under the Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDV Act) on a contract basis and on a consolidated salary of Rs.10,000/- per...
M/S. Dhoop Chawn Construction &Finance (P) Ltd vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 3645/2016 M/S. DHOOP CHAWN CONSTRUCTION &FINANCE (P) LTD Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Ms. Sunita Ojha and Ms. J.Priyadarshini, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter as the 2013 Act) that, the land acquisition proceedings in respect to land admeasuring 3 Bighas 19 Biswas of land comprised in Khasra Nos.120 (0- 16), 121/(0-12(, 122 (0-11) &123 (2-0), situated in revenue Estate of Village Satbari, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New De...
Sms Limited vs.delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Cor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~33 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :9. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 765/2019, CM APPLs. 3325/2019 (stay), 9569/2019 (vacation) & 31289/2019 (impleadment) SMS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Mr.Sandeep Das, Ms.Arushi Mishra & Mr.Asif, Advts. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms.Shreya Sharma, Ms.Nikita Salwan and Mr.Ayush Srivastava, Advts. for respondent. Mr.Rajshekar Rao, Mr.Matrugupta Mishra, Mr.Omar Waziri and Mr.Karthik Sundar, Advts. for the intervenor/Tamil Nadu Waste Management in C.M.31289/2019 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, this writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The necessary facts required to be noticed for disposal of this petition are that a notice bearing RFP No.2/17-18 (Tender ID...
Deepu Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5075/2019 DEEPU KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Hardayal Singh, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. K. K. Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Anuj Yadav, PS Dwarka North, SI Kalam Singh, PS Sagarpur Mr. Jitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 37592/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5075/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.180/2015 dated 25.02.2015, registered at PS Sagar Pur and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 5075/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties...
Sudesh Kumar Bansal vs.ajay Saini & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 586/2019 Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2019 SUDESH KUMAR BANSAL AJAY SAINI & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Nagender Yadav, Advocate for R-1 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.44464/2019 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.44466/2019 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 1. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner that the petition was originally filed within time but was returned with objections and thereafter it took some time to remove the objections, consequently, a delay of 76 days in re-filing the petition has occurred. RC.REV. 586/2019 Page 1 of 6 2. Learned counsel further submits that in any event this being a rent revision, is covered by Article 137 of the Limitation Act and the limitati...
Axis Communications Through: Its Managing Partner vs.wapcos Ltd. And O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 6657/2019 & CM APPL. No.28099/2019 AXIS COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH: ITS MANAGING PARTNER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anoop P. Awasthi, Adv. versus WAPCOS LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Mr.Manish Srivastava, Ms. Mehak Khurana & Mr. Rijul Taneja, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Kapil Gupta, Adv. for R-2. Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Vikram Jetley, CGSC with Ms. Ishita Singh, Mr. Harshul Choudhary, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. for R-3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. With the consent of the parties, we set down the present writ petition for final hearing and final disposal. WP(C) No.6657/2019 page 1 of 15 2. The following prayers have been made: a. Issue Writ in the nature of Mandamus or Certiorari or any other writ or ord...
Vidhanshi Kamalia & Anr vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2019 + LPA6032019 VIDHANSHI KAMALIA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Mr. Kaushik Ghosh, Advs. for University of Delhi Mr. Preet Pal Singh and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advs. for BCI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER0910.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) LPA No.603/2019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioners whose WP(C) No.8604/2019 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 8th August, 2019.2. Counsel appearing for the appellants (original petitioners) submits that the appellants are seeking admission in LL.B. course with respondent No.2 university. LPA6032019 Page 1 of 6 3. These appellants are unreserved category candidates. Counsel appearing for the appellants submits...
Bijender Gupta vs.hardawari Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2019 RC.REV. 221/2016 BIJENDER GUPTA HARDAWARI LAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Rajeev Kumar Rai, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. B.K Pandey, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns the order dated 22.12.2015 whereby the eviction petition filed by the petitioner under Sections 14(1) (a) and 14(1) (e) has been dismissed returning a finding that the petitioner has not been able to prove his ownership to the property.2. The rent controller has dismissed the petition solely on the ground that the petitioner has sought to place reliance on agreement-to-sell, General Power of Attorney and other sale documents and there is no sale deed in favour of the petitioner.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the rent controller has not appreciate that the petit...
Lalit Alias Lucky vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1109/2018 LALIT alias LUCKY ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Mr. Nitish Mittal, Mr. Prasanna and Ms. Heena Tangri, Advocates. STATE versus Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Balbir Singh, PS S.B.Dairy. Date of Decision:09. h October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment dated 10th October, 2018 and the order 12th October, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Pilot Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.715/2017 arising out of FIR No.405/2017 under SectionsIPC registered with Police Station Shahbad Dairy, whereas the charge was framed under Section 302 IPC only. The appellant-convict had been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo Page 1 of 13 CRL. A.1109/2018 rigorous imprisonme...
M/S Tarouni Construction&finance (P) Ltd vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 3648/2016 M/S TAROUNI CONSTRUCTION&FINANCE (P) LTD Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for R- LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking a declaration under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter as the 2013 Act) that, the land acquisition proceedings in respect to land admeasuring 4 Bighas of land comprised in Khasra Nos. 120 (2-0) &122(2- 0), situated in revenue Estate of Village Satbari, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi, (hereinafter as subject land) was acquired vide Award bearing No.14/1987-88 dated 26th May 1987, are deemed to have lapsed.2. The reliefs sought by the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »