Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Ravinder Chaudhary vs.the Veterinary Council of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~32 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 9931/2017 DR. RAVINDER CHAUDARY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10595/2017 AMIT NAIN ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERNINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 478/2018 & CM APPL.2063/2018 DR RAVINDER CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.K. Singh with Mr. Aniruddh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASC with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 9931/2017 & Connected matters Page 1 of 6 Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay with Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners, in these petitions, seek declaration of the result of the election held for the post of Vice President, which was he...
Nitin Mavi & Ors vs.state (Govt. Of n.c.t of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5092/2019 NITIN MAVI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rajesh Sherawat, Adv. with Mr.Yashpal Singh Khari, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI) & ANR Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Jagjeevan PS Badarpur. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 37704/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A. 37705/2019 3. In view of the reasons stated in the present application, the delay of 35 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.4. The application is allowed and disposed of. CRL.M.C.5092/2019 Page 1 of 3 Crl.M.C.5092/2019 5. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.199/2016 dated 14.06.2016 registered at Police Station Badarpur instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefro...
Nand Ram vs.kanwal Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h August, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 + NAND RAM CS (OS) 1442/2015 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Maldeep Sidhu and Ms. Aishwarya Anand, Advocates. (M:85889. 0639) versus KANWAL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Ms. Renu Kuhar, Mr. Varun K. Bala and Mr. Suresh Khadav, (M:99999. 1625) Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A64622017 1. The Plaintiff - Sh. Nand Ram has filed the present suit for partition against his two brothers, Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 - Sh. Kanwal Singh and Sh. Suraj Bhan, respectively. All three parties are the sons of late Sh. Bharat Singh, who died in 1979. Brief Facts 2. The case of the Plaintiff, in brief, is that his father - Sh. Bharat Singh was survived by his three sons, three daughters and his wife - Smt. Nahar Kaur. The three daughters of Sh. Bharat Singh had been married in the early 197...
Dr. Ravinder Chaudary and Anr. Vs.the Veterinary Council of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~32 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 9931/2017 DR. RAVINDER CHAUDARY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10595/2017 AMIT NAIN ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERNINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 478/2018 & CM APPL.2063/2018 DR RAVINDER CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.K. Singh with Mr. Aniruddh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASC with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 9931/2017 & Connected matters Page 1 of 6 Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay with Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners, in these petitions, seek declaration of the result of the election held for the post of Vice President, which was he...
Sadab vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 1067/2016 PRASHANT GUPTA @ RINKU versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates. : Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. : SI Ajit Krishna, PS Mandawali. WITH + CRL.A. 1068/2016 SADAB versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates. : Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. : SI Ajit Krishna, PS Mandawali. AND + CRL.A. 1069/2016 Crl. A. No.1067/2016, 1068/2016, 1069/2016 Page 1 of 13 MOHD SHAFI versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates...
Basant Projects Ltd vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~A-21 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 401/2019 BASANT PROJECTS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi, Advocate versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. Through: Mr. M.U. Khan, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) IA No.13984/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. I.A. No.13985/2019 (Delay) This is an application seeking condonation of 17 days delay in re- filing of the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 17 days in refiling the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 401/2019 Page 1 of 3 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 401/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. M.U. Khan, Advocate, enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.3. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (th...
Itihad Motors Pvt Ltd. Vs.paras Dass Jain Charitable Trust
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h October, 2019 ITIHAD MOTORS PVT LTD. CM (M) 628/2019 & CM APPL. 18997/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. Saini and Ms. Bhavana versus Jain, Advocates. (M:93502. 5162) PARAS DASS JAIN CHARITABLE TRUST ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocates. (M:98715. 8350) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 23rd January, 2019 and consequential setting aside of the judgment/order dated 3rd October, 2013 by which the suit for possession filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) was decreed.2. The brief background is that the Plaintiff, which is a charitable trust, filed a suit for possession, mesne profits and damages against the... Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) in respect of the plot of land situated in Khasra No.429/61, Village Azadpur, Delhi (now forming par...
Islam vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
% + CRL.A. 916/2016 ISLAM STATE versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 ...... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr Rajender Sharma. For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with Inspector Ratnesh Kumar and ASI Suresh Kumar, PS New Usman Pur. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereafter CrPC) against a judgment dated 27.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, whereby the appellant was convicted for offences under Sections 393/397/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). The appellant impugned an order dated 31.08.2016, whereby he was sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of 5,000/- under Section 393 of the IPC read with Section 397 of the IPC. The appellant was also directed to serve a further period of six CRL.A....
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.chanan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:10. 10.2019 MAC.APP. 279/2018 Through: Mr. Gaurav Nair, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) CHANAN SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS Through ..... Respondent This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 20.01.2018 1. passed by the learned MACT in Case No.450464/2016, on the ground that it did not grant right of recovery to the appellant-insurer against the owner of the offending-insured vehicle. It is the appellants case that by notice dated 17.11.2017 it had sought following information from the owner of the vehicle under Order 12 Rule 8 CPC: ... Take note that you, the addressees, are required to produce valid and effective Driving license of Gopal Driver, Permit & Fitness certificate and Registration Certificate of Offending Vehicle bearing No.HR-38H-5698(Truck) which covers on the date of accident i.e. 29.04.2008... 2. The said letter was...
Sandeep vs.national Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~24 & 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 390/2019 & CM APPL. 13144/2019 Decided on:10. 10.2019 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant SANDEEP & ORS + MAC.APP. 483/2019 versus SANDEEP versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate for insurance company. Mr. Puneet Varshney, Advocate for R-1 in item 24 and for appellant in item 26. Mr. Sanjay Khanna and Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 in item 26. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The aforesaid two appeals are against the award of compensation dated 14.01.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MAC Petition No.393/17. The insurer seeks reduction of the quantum of compensation while the claimant seeks enhancement of the same. The head-on collision between MAC.APP. No.390/2019 & 483/2019 Page 1 of 7 two motorcycles resulted in the claimants loss of one eye. It is the insurers case that t...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »