Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Swami Suprakashananda & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~1A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h October, 2019 + FAO1422017 SWAMI SUPRAKASHANANDA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Amitava Acharjee & Mr.Ayush Acharjee, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Ayushi Chaudhary, Advocate for Ms.Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1. Mr.A.K. Mishra & Mr.Samrat, Advocates for R-3 to R-5 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. The present appeal is directed against a judgment dated 21.01.2017 passed by learned ADJ-02, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in PC No.50836/2016 [Old PC No.95/2012].. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court rejected a petition for grant of probate/letters of administration, in respect of a Will dated 19.04.2011 of late Ms. Sarla Mehra [hereinafter referred to as the Will]..2. The petition was filed by the appellant No.1 on 31.10.2012 seeking probate/letter of administration of the Will, which was registered. The appellant No.1 is the secretary of Ramakr...
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sandeep & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~24 & 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 390/2019 & CM APPL. 13144/2019 Decided on:10. 10.2019 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant SANDEEP & ORS + MAC.APP. 483/2019 versus SANDEEP versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate for insurance company. Mr. Puneet Varshney, Advocate for R-1 in item 24 and for appellant in item 26. Mr. Sanjay Khanna and Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 in item 26. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The aforesaid two appeals are against the award of compensation dated 14.01.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MAC Petition No.393/17. The insurer seeks reduction of the quantum of compensation while the claimant seeks enhancement of the same. The head-on collision between MAC.APP. No.390/2019 & 483/2019 Page 1 of 7 two motorcycles resulted in the claimants loss of one eye. It is the insurers case that t...
Rakesh Kumar Verma and Ors. Vs.radha Krishan Verma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h August, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 CS (OS) 541/2014 RAKESH KUMAR VERMA AND ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Payak, Advocate. versus RADHA KRISHAN VERMA AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Mahipal, Advocate for D- 2 to D-4 (M:98101. 6643), Defendant No.5 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 4573/2019 1. This is an application by the Plaintiffs seeking modification of the judgment and decree dated 30th November, 2015 and for taking on record the amended Memo of parties.2. The background of the present suit is that the Plaintiffs and the Defendants are the legal heirs of Late Shri Raghunath Prasad Verma, who was the absolute owner of property bearing No.C-35, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, admeasuring 1066 sq. yards (hereinafter, suit property). The suit for partition and permanent injunction was filed by three sons and one daughter of Late Shri Raghunath...
Mohd Shafi vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 1067/2016 PRASHANT GUPTA @ RINKU versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates. : Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. : SI Ajit Krishna, PS Mandawali. WITH + CRL.A. 1068/2016 SADAB versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates. : Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. : SI Ajit Krishna, PS Mandawali. AND + CRL.A. 1069/2016 Crl. A. No.1067/2016, 1068/2016, 1069/2016 Page 1 of 13 MOHD SHAFI versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates...
Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd vs.employees State ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"10th October, 2019 + FAO4952017 CENTRAL COTTAGE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD Through: Mr. Shaurya Sahay, Adv. ..... Appellant versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Singh, Ms. Prachi Singh & Ms. Nisha Hans, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd. (CCIC), a public sector undertaking, has been established by the Government of India and is functioning under the control of Ministry of Textiles. The respondent Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), on the other hand, is a statutory authority established by Section 3 of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) with the responsibility of administration of scheme of Employees State Insurance in accordance with the provisions of the said law. FAO No.495/2017 Page 1 of 12 2. The appellant CCIC had earlier approached this Court invoking the writ ...
Suresh Chand Goel & Sons (Huf) & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 + LPA5902019 and CM No.40791/2019 SURESH CHAND GOEL & SONS (HUF) & ANR..... Appellants Through: Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. V.P. Rana and Mr. Karan Singh, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for R-1 and 2 Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel-DUSIB with Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate for respondent no.5 Ms. Shefali Vohra, Adv. for R-3/SDM Model Town Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel-North DMC/R-4 with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Ms. Shiva Pandey and Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1010.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) LPA5902019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioners against an order dated 30th August, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in CM No.39033/2019 in W.P.(C) 9479/2019, whereby stay was denied to the appe...
Action Ispat & Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs.shyam Metalics & Energy Limited & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:29. 08.2019 Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 Co. App 11/2019 & C.M. No.31047/2019, C.M. No.34726/2019 ACTION ISPAT & POWER PVT. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Ms. Varsha versus Banerjee, Mr. Kund Godhwani and Mr. Kunal Godwani, Advs. SHYAM METALICS & ENERGY LIMITED & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sylona Mohapatra, Mr. R.S. Lakshman, Mr. Sindhu T P, Mr. Ashwini Kumar Singh and Mr. P.V. Dinesh, Advs. for R-2 along with Mr. Kishan Lal, AGM, SBI. Mr. Arjun Nanda and Ms. Shreya Nair, Advs. for Applicant in C.M. No.34726/19. Mr. J.Amol Anand and Mr. Ytharth Kumar, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Megha Bharara, Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Ayushman, Advs. for Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Co. App. 11/2019 Page 1 of 25 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The instant appeal has been pre...
Sushma Raina vs.canara Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8506/2018 SUSHMA RAINA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurubaksh Singh, Mr. Virender Jarnal Singh, and Mr. Singh Advocates versus CANARA BANK AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pratap Chandra Rana, Advocate for Respondent No.1 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1010.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This petition is directed against an order dated 1st February, 2018 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in Misc. Cas. No 64/2018 in Appeal No.151/2016.2. The background to the present petition is that the... Petitioner is an employee of a sister concern of Respondent No.2 company i.e. Vimoha Exports Pvt. Ltd. It is stated that the said Respondent company had availed of some credit facility from Respondent No.1, Canara Bank, in connection with which security documents were executed way back on 31st December, W.P.(C) 8506/2018 Page 1 of 7 1994.3. The... Petitioner claims that the notices issue...
Nanak Chand @ Nanak Ram & Anr vs.rajinder Kumar Ratawal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 RC.REV. 306/2019 NANAK CHAND @ NANAK RAM & ANR........ Petitioners versus RAJINDER KUMAR RATAWAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw with Mr. Shivansh Soni, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 306/2019 & CM APPL.23799/2019 APPL.44020/2019 (for fixation of user charges) (stay), CM1... Petitioners impugn order dated 24.12.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from a shop on RC.REV. 306/2019 Page 1 of 3 the ground floor of a property bearing No.65/17, New Rohtak Road, ...
Dr. Ravinder Chaudhary vs.the Veterinary Council of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~32 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 9931/2017 DR. RAVINDER CHAUDARY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10595/2017 AMIT NAIN ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERNINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 478/2018 & CM APPL.2063/2018 DR RAVINDER CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.K. Singh with Mr. Aniruddh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASC with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 9931/2017 & Connected matters Page 1 of 6 Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay with Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners, in these petitions, seek declaration of the result of the election held for the post of Vice President, which was he...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »