Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Goutam Shoe Store & Anr. Vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C.4698/2019 & CRL.M.A.36045/2019 Judgment reserved on :01.10.2019 Date of decision :10.10.2019 M/S GOUTAM SHOE STORE & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rizwan, Advocate. versus RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley & Mr. Akshay Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner no.1 M/s Goutam Shoe Store through its signatory Goutam Dutt arrayed as the petitioner nos. 1 & 2 respectively, vide the present petition seek the quashing of the Complaint Case No.6337/2019 and the proceedings emanating therefrom, pending before the learned MM-04, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi as well as the quashing of the order dated 01.05.2019 vide which the petitioner was summoned on cognizance having been taken by the learned Trial Court of the MM-04 (NI Act) NDD/PHC, New Delhi District of the alleged commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable...
Yaman Kumar Sharma and Ors vs.university of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 9365/2018 YAMAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Dhingra, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for R-University of Delhi Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar Shukla, Adv. for R-UOI + W.P. (C) 12540/2018 DR. INDU KUMARI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Hemant Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for R-University of Delhi + W.P. (C) 12572/2018 DR. TRIPTI TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon and Ms. Mamta Tandon, Mr. Siddhant Tyagi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P. (C) 9365/2018, 12540/2018, 12572/2018, 12747/2018, 2777/2019 Page 1 of 46 Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for R-University of Delhi + W.P. (C) 12747/2018 VIJAY KUMAR VAID ......
Smt. Veena Devi vs.container Coporation of India Ltd.(concor) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 10, 2019 % W.P.(C) 38/2019, CM APPL. 209/2019 SMT. VEENA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Thomas Oommen, Adv. versus CONTAINER COPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(CONCOR) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kanishka Prasad, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 38/2019, CM APPL. 209/2019 By the instant petition, the petitioner, who was initially appointed as Stenographer Gr-I in the year 2005 and with successive promotions was appointed as Junior Officer/Private Secretary on 01.07.2018, assails and seeks quashing of her transfer No.109/2018 dated 05.12.2018 and the relieving order No.201/1419 dated 06.12.2018. The impugned transfer/office order 109/2018 dated 05.12.2018, 2. reads as under:"Ms. Veena (Private Secretary)/Corporate office is transferred and posted as Regional Office/ER with immediate effect. Officer Devi, Jr. W.P.(C) 38/201...
Amit Nain vs.the Veterninary Council of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~32 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 9931/2017 DR. RAVINDER CHAUDARY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 10595/2017 AMIT NAIN ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERNINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 478/2018 & CM APPL.2063/2018 DR RAVINDER CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner versus THE VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.K. Singh with Mr. Aniruddh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASC with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 9931/2017 & Connected matters Page 1 of 6 Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay with Mr. Rahul Kulhare, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners, in these petitions, seek declaration of the result of the election held for the post of Vice President, which was he...
Rajiv Gupta vs.l. R. Gupta, Huf & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26th July, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 RAJIV GUPTA CS (OS) 1968/2003 Through: Mr. Rajat ..... Plaintiff Bhalla, Advocate. L. R. GUPTA, HUF & ORS. versus (M:9811661193) ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Manashwy Jha and Ms. Urvi Kapoor, Advocates for D-1 to 3. (M:9013980691) Mr. P. K. Agrawal, Ms. Mercy Hussain and Ms. Tannya Sharma, Advocates for D-4. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.1571/2006(under Order XXIII Rule 3 and Order IX Rule 13 CPC) 1. The present application arises out of a suit for partition, rendition of accounts and injunction involving the family of Mr. L. R. Gupta, a Senior Advocate of this Court. Mr. L.R. Gupta has three children- two sons and a daughter, namely Mr. Rajiv Gupta, Mr. Sanjay Gupta and Ms. Sumangli Gupta @ Sumangli Jain. The present suit was filed by Mr. Rajiv Gupta against Shri L. R. Gupta HUF -Defendant No.1 a...
Inderjeet Singh Sidhu vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 10, 2019 % W.P.(C) 3985/2018 INDERJEET SINGH SIDHU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.N. Kaul and Mr. Vinod Zutshi, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate. Mr. Aabhas Kshetarpal and Ms.Gunjan Mathur, Advocates for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.By the instant writ petition, the petitioner, in effect, seeks quashing of the order dated 08.02.2018, whereby, the representation made by the petitioner, who was employed with Fertilizers and Chemical Travancore Limited in short 'FCTL' as Chief Operating W.P.(C) 3985/2018 Page 1 of 12 Officer in short 'COO' was disposed of and as a consequence thereof, he was required to pay three months' salary in lieu of notice pay. for 2. Concisely, the facts are that the respondents had issued an advertisement/notification no.GM-HR&ADMN-COO2015dated ...
Prashant Gupta @ Rinku vs.state (Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 1067/2016 PRASHANT GUPTA @ RINKU versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates. : Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. : SI Ajit Krishna, PS Mandawali. WITH + CRL.A. 1068/2016 SADAB versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates. : Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. : SI Ajit Krishna, PS Mandawali. AND + CRL.A. 1069/2016 Crl. A. No.1067/2016, 1068/2016, 1069/2016 Page 1 of 13 MOHD SHAFI versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Dhan Mohan, Ms Tanu B. Mishra and : Mr Ravi Mishra, Advocates...
Tci Freight (A Division of Transport Corporation of India Limited) vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~A-3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 ARB.P. 599/2019 TCI FREIGHT (A DIVISION OF TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra & Mr. Aruj Dhingra, Advocates with Mr. Rajeev Pandey, AR versus M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rimali Batra, Ms. Iti Agarwal & Mr. Paritosh Goel, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13161/2019 (Delay) This is an application seeking condonation of 258 days delay in re- filing of the petition. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the delay being condoned. In view of no objection and for the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 258 days in refiling the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 599/2019 1. Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent has been handed over in Court and is taken on record. ARB.P. 599/2019 Page 1 of 4 2. The disputes in the present ...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr vs.krishan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~A-22 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 12111/2016 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Zahid Hanief, Adv. for Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD, with Mr. Anil Tomar, Advs. versus KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Davinder Verma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed seeking to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to set-aside the impugned order dated 07.09.2015 passed by Central Information Commission (CIC).2. The case of the respondent is that in 1987 a plot measuring 112 sq yards under the 20 Point Programme bearing plot no.170, Village Gram Sabha, Bawana was allotted to the petitioner. On 14.10.1987, he deposited Rs.54 for the aforesaid land but the possession of the said plot has still not been handed over to him. Based on the above, the respondent filed an RTI application on 13.01.2011, where he sought information as to w...
Roshan Lal & Anr. Vs.shanker Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 RC.REV. 347/2016 & CM APPL. 24837/2016 ROSHAN LAL & ANR SHANKER GUPTA versus ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Vijay K. Gupta and Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 20.02.2016 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from Shop No.5, admeasuring 28 sq. ft. in property bearing No.4787, Summi RC.REV. 347/2016 Page 1 of 5 Hardware Market, Phatak Namak, Hauz Qazi, Delhi-110006, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached ...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »