Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sachin Alias Chajja vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 743/2019 SACHIN alias CHAJJA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Badar Mahmood, Mr.Atul Kumar Sharma and Mr.Aditya Raj, Advocates. versus $~ * + THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. Reserved on :19. h September, 2019 Date of Decision:10. h October, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment dated 05th March, 2019 and the order dated 08th March, 2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03 (FTC), North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.53529/2016 arising out of FIR No.617/2016 under Section 302 IPC and Sections Arms Act registered with Police Station Mangolpuri, whereby the appellant-convict had been convicted under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 30,000/- ...
Rathi Ispat Ltd vs.inox Air Product Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24th May, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 + O.M.P. 708/2012 & CCP(O) 10/2017, I.A. 2317/2018, I.A. + 8691/2018 RATHI ISPAT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shiv Khurana, Advocate (M. No.9810006115) versus INOX AIR PRODUCT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Atul. S. Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh & Mr. Prabal Mehrotra, Advocates (M. No.9811022261) INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 161/2017 & I.A. 2320/2018 AND ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Atul. S. Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh & Mr. Prabal Mehrotra, Advocates versus RATHI ISPAT LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Siddhant Kr. Singh, Mr. Anurag Sahay & Mr. Raghav Wadhur, Advocates (M. No.9999255931) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The above proceedings arise out of an award dated 14th March, 2012 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator which has been challenged before this Court in OMP7082012. The second petition, O...
Nardev @ Sonu vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 1543/2018 Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 NARDEV @ SONU ........ Petitioner Versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms Vagisha Kochar, Advocate. : Mr Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr Chaitanya Gosain and Mr Amanpreet Singh, Advocates for State. SI Pankaj Kumar, P.S. Khyala. Ms Vidhi Gupta for Mr Saurabh Kaushal, Advocate for R2/Complainant. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that the trial of the case captioned State v. Nardev @ Sonu: FIR No.448/2014 under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter POCSO Act) and Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) be transferred from the Court of learned ASJ to the Juvenile Justice Board for its adjudication. W.P.(CRL) 1543/2018 Page 1 of 18 The present petit...
Center of Applied Politics vs.govt of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5002019 and CM No.34901/2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 CENTER OF APPLIED POLITICS Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishal Singh, Mr. Rohan Jaitley, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Ms.Bhagya Yadav, Advs. ..... Appellant versus GOVT OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Farman Ali, Mr. Aditya Ajay, Advs. and Mr. Vijay Kumar, ASO-L&DO ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1010.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) LPA5002019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose W.P.(C) 5513/2017 has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 30th July, 2019 (Annexure A- 4 to the memo of this LPA). Hence the original petitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal. The main contention of the original petitioner was regarding the challenge of the order dated 23rd June, 2017 (page 85 ...
Ram Prakash Mittal & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5892019 & CM No.40789/2019 % :1. Date of Decision:10. h October, 2019 RAM PRAKASH MITTAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.B.K.Sood, Adv. with Mr.Harish Gaur, Mr.V.P.Rana, Mr.Karan Singh, Advs. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. for DUSIB Ms.Shefali Vohra, Adv. for R-3/SDM Model Town Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan,Ms.Shiva Pandey and Ms. Khushboo Nahar, Advs. for North DMC/R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D. N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner against order dated 30th August, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.M.Appl.No.39032/2019 in W.P.(C) No.9478/2019 whereby stay was denied to the appellant herein. The appell...
Airports Authority of India vs.yashpal Singh Tanwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1297/2018 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K.Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Divvijay Rai, Mr. Anshul Rai and Mr. Kustubh Singh, Advs. versus YASHPAL SINGH TANWAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Virmani, Adv. with Mr. Himanshu and Mr. G.Sri Hashan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1010.2019 The services of the respondent were terminated, by the % 1. petitioner, on 1st June, 1981.2. The respondent initiated an industrial dispute, which was referred, by the Central Government, to the Industrial Tribunal, vide order dated 27th September, 1988. The sole issue, as framed by the referral order, was whether the termination of the services of the respondent, by the petitioner, w.e.f. 1st June, 1981, was justified and, if so, the relief to which the respondent would be entitled.3. The reference was adjudicated, by the Industrial Tribunal, vide award dated 26th September, 1997. The Industrial Tri...
Parveen Gupta & Anr vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4823/2019 1. PARVEEN GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Vikrant and Mr. Brijesh, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through Mr.Panna Lai Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Kapil, PS - Farsh Bazar Adv. for R-2 (appearance not given) with respondent no.2/complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.424 dated 26.11.2018, registered at PS Farsh Bazar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C. 4823/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2...
Pankaj Kumar vs.tarak Mandal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 RC.REV. 509/2019 PANKAJ KUMAR versus TARAK MANDAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajnish Kumar with Mr. Hemant Kaushik, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Santosh with Mr. Pratyush, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 509/2019 & CM APPL.38757/2019 APPL.39942/2019 (stay) (stay), CM1... Petitioner impugns orders dated 12.02.2019, whereby, leave to defend applications of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop at RC.REV. 509/2019 Page 1 of 3 Property No.1/6698, Gali No.4, East Rohtas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, more particularly shown in red colour in the site ...
Kings Furnishing& Safecompany vs.central University of Jharkhand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~A-20 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 400/2019 KINGS FURNISHING& SAFECOMPANY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advocate versus CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF JHARKHAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Paliwal & Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A No.13982/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (MISC.) (COMM.) 400/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Manish Paliwal, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of respondent and accepts notice.3. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (the Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of Award.4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the Facilitation Council under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 400/2019 Page 1 of 2 Development A...
Manish Divedi vs.smt Jyotsana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DEL HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:17. h July, 2019 Judgment delivered on:10. h October, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 951/2017 MANISH DIVEDI versus SMT JYOTSANA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Kavita Jha with Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni and Ms. Devika Jain, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1... Petitioner impugns order dated 16.11.2017, whereby ad-interim maintenance was granted to the respondent under section 125 Cr.P.C in the sum of Rs 10,000/- per month from the date of application i.e. 01.09.2017.2. The marriage between the parties was solemnized in accordance with Hindu Rights and Ceremonies on 29.01.2017. However, due to differences respondent left her matrimonial house on 16.04.2017. CRL.REV. P..951/2017 Page 1 of 7 3. Subject petition was filed b...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »