Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi State Electricity Workers Union and Ors. Vs.government of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"10.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 10254/2019 & CM No.42275/2019 (stay) DELHI STATE ELECTRICITY WORKERS UNION AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Salim A. Inamdar, Mr. M.H. Khan and Mr. Rishikesh Rajan, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Deepak Shriastava, Adv. for R1 & R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the Delhi State Electricity Workers Union and its office bearers have sought quashing of the order dated 31.07.2019 passed by the Deputy Registrar (Trade Union), Government of NCT of Delhi, i.e., respondent no.2, refusing to register the amendments to the Rules of the petitioner No.1/Union as adopted by its General Council on 05.08.2018. The petitioners have also sought a direction to the respondent no.2 to forthwith register the aforesaid amendments to the rules.2. Learned counsel for respondent...
Ashutosh Garg vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5096/2019 ASHUTOSH GARG ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.S. Haider, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Insp.Dharmendra Kumar EOW. Mr.Pradeep Rana, Adv. for R-2 & 3 with R-2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37727/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5096/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.185/2017 dated 03.07.2017, registered at PS Kotwali, District North Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5096/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the pa...
Neeraj Kumar vs.ram Mandal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 RC.REV. 503/2019 NEERAJ KUMAR versus RAM MANDAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr. Rajnish Kumar with Mr. Hemant Kaushik, Advocates. Mr. Santosh with Mr. Pratyush, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 503/2019 & CM APPL.38201/2019 APPL.39941/2019 (stay) (stay), CM1... Petitioner impugns orders dated 12.02.2019, whereby, leave to defend applications of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from shop at RC.REV. 503/2019 Page 1 of 3 Property No.1/6698, Gali No.4, East Rohtas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, more particularly shown in red colour in the site pl...
M/S Gill Acqua Hydro Power Generation Company pvt.ltd vs.m/s the New I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~A~22 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 + ARB.P. 570/2019 M/S GILL ACQUA HYDRO POWER GENERATION COMPANY PVT.LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dinesh Sharma and Ms. Ritika Jhurani, Advocates. versus M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (the Act) for appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. The disputes arise out of an Erection All Risk Insurance Policy which covered the project of the petitioner at Punjab, initially for a period from 10.8.2015 to 30.4.2016, wherein the sum insured was Rs.67,000,000/-. The policy was subsequently extended. On 12.7.2016 due to heavy rainfall at the project side damage was caused to the project of the petitioner and he filed a claim with the responde...
Vijay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DEL HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:8. h July, 2019 Judgment delivered on:10. h October, 2019 + CRL. A.9/2019 VIJAY STATE versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: MR. Aditya Wadhwa, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 Appellant impugns judgment on conviction dated 19.07.2018 and order on sentence dated 02.08.2018 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 4 POCSO Act as well as for the offences punishable under Sections 367/377/506 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years under Section 4 of POCSO Act and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months, for the offence under Section 367 IPC for a period of six years with fine of Rs. 10,0...
Dr. Shidore Shital Mhatardeo vs.national Board of Examination (Nbe)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 01.10.2019 Judgment pronounced on 10.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 7255/2019 & CM APPL. 30114/2019 DR. SHIDORE SHITAL MHATARDEO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Yadav with Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Mr. Prashant Dahat, Mr. Taran Arora, and Ms. Priya Singh, Advocates. versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION (NBE) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, and Mr. Rohan Anand, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 7581/2019 & CM APPL. 31549/2019 DR. JAYA BAJPAI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kaustubh Shukla with Mr. Abhay Singh, Advocates. versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, and Mr. Rohan Anand, Advocates. W.P. (C) No.7255/2019 Page 1 of 42 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:1. The chasm between justice and what a wooden approach to law can lead to is brought to fore in these cases. T...
Shri Saurabh Tripathy vs.competition Commission of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 2079/2018 SHRI SAURABH TRIPATHY versus ........ Petitioner COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Gourab Banerji, Senior Advocate with Mr Saurav Agrawal, Mr Anirudha Agarwala, Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Ms Raka Chatterjee and Mr S.P. Mukherjee, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms Purnima Singh and Ms Shibani Khuntia, Advocates for R-1. Mr Rajshekhar Rao, Mr Ram Kumar, Mr Vinayak Mehrotra and Mr Dhruv Dikshit, Advocates for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 16.02.2017 passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter CCI) in Case No.63/2014, whereby CCI had concluded that a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter the Act) was established against respondent no.2...
Pawan Kumar vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 727/2016&CRL.M.A. 14401/2017 (stay) * Judgment Reserved :25.09.2019 Date of Decision :10. 10.2019 IN THE MATTER OF PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj & Mr. Ziad Ahmed, Advocates STATE & ANR Versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Sanjay Singh, P.S. Greater Kailash ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI The petitioner was convicted vide judgment dated 21.01.2016 1. passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court (South East), Saket Courts, New Delhi in FIR No.50/2013 registered under Section 354A IPC at P.S. GK-I. The petitioner was sentenced to SI for 6 months for the offence under Section 354A IPC along with a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of which the petitioner was further directed to undergo SI for two days.2. The appeal filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed vide judgment dated 21.10.2...
Neelam & Ors vs.pradeep Birman & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h October, 2019. CS(OS) 479/2016 & IA No.14077/2019 (u/O XIV R-5 CPC) NEELAM & ORS .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Dabas and Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocates Versus PRADEEP BIRMAN & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Drall and Mr. Chirag Madan, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Ajay Shanker, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Vipin Nausheen Samar, Advocates for R-3 Mr. Dhirandar Mathur, Advocate for R-4 & R-9 Jai and Mohammad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff No.1 Smt. Neelam, for herself and as mother and natural 1. guardian of her son Master Anshul impleaded as plaintiff No.2, instituted this suit against her husband Pradeep Birman and the Managers of Punjab National Bank, Village Paprawat, Delhi and Punjab National Bank, Najafgarh Road, Nangloi, Delhi, for the reliefs of (i) declaration that 2/3rd share equal to Rs.2,17,00,000/- out of the total amount of Rs.3,26,00,000/- lyi...
Geeta Kapoor vs.jaipal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 RC.REV. 486/2019 & CM APPL. 36813/2019 GEETA KAPOOR JAIPAL & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.K. Rawal, Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 12.04.2019 whereby leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent No.1 and 2 had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner from shop bearing private No.4, in property bearing Municipal No.5, Church Mission Road, Fatepuri, Delhi, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14 (1) (e) of RC.REV.486/2019 Page 1 of 8 the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, more p...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »