Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gaur Hari Guchhait & Ors vs.shogun Organics Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. h October, 2019 + RFA(OS)(COMM) 41/2019 GAUR HARI GUCHHAIT & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manav Kumar & Mr. Manoj Kumar Sahu, Advs. Versus SHOGUN ORGANICS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Advocate, Ms.Rajeshwari H., Mr. Saif Rahman Ansari & Mr.Swapnil Gaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) : JUDGMENT CAV10102019 Since learned counsel for the caveator are present, caveat stands discharged. CM APPL.44549-44550/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RFA(OS)(COMM) 41/2019 1. This appeal has been preferred by the original defendants in a Civil Suit being CS(COMM) No.201/2017. The civil suit was filed by the respondent in these proceedings alleging breach of process patent by the original defendants. The suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 14th August, 2019 (Annexure A to the memo of this first ...
Less Than Equals Three Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs.paras Mehra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h September, 2019 Pronounced on:11. h October, 2019 + CS(COMM) 914/2018 & I.A. 7617/2018 LESS THAN EQUALS THREE SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhary, Mr.Bhanu Dhingra, Advocates alongwith Mr.Manmeet Singh, Director. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ravish Kr.Goyal, Advocate for D-1 to D-5. Mr.Devvrat Joshi & Ms.Savni Dutt, Advocates for D-7. PARAS MEHRA & ORS % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff-company, which claims to operate a website under the domain name "www.quickcompany.in". The said website is intended to assist companies in managing regulatory compliances. It is alleged that the plaintiff-company is founded by one Mr.Manmeet Singh (hereinafter referred to as MS), who continues to be a director of the company. The allegation against defendant nos. 1, 2 and 4 is that, although they were founders and sh...
State vs. Ravi Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~7 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 552/2019 STATE Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ........ Petitioner with SI Satish Kumar, PS Sarita Vihar. versus RAVI KUMAR & ANR. Through None ........ RESPONDENTS Date of Decision:11. h October, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): Crl.M.A.No.37781/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A.No.37782/2019 Keeping in view the averments in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 28 days in filing the present leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CRL. L.P. 552/2019 Page 1 of 11 Crl.L.P.No.552/2019 1. Present Criminal Leave Petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 29th May, 2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Special Fast Track Court, South East District,...
u.p. State Road Transport Corporation vs.saraswati Bisht & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 745/2018 Decided on:11. 10.2019 U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates. versus SARASWATI BISHT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Sangwan, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 44828/2019 1.2. 3.4. This application seeks restoration of the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number and seniority. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 745/2018 5. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 17.05.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MAC No.168/2016 on the ground that the injury caused to the claimant was entirely on account of her own negligence. MAC.APP. No.745/2018 Page 1 of 4 It is the appellants case that the claimant, alongwith some 150 other passengers, had simultaneously tried to board the bus, which wa...
Duli Chand & Anr. Vs.aditya Kumar Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 438/2018 Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2019 DULI CHAND & ANR ........ Petitioners versus ADITYA KUMAR GUPTA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate with petitioner No.2 in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Mayank Mohan with Mr. Lokesh Jha, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 08.05.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from a shop No.1146, Basement Floor of property No.1137, Chatta Madan Gopal, Maliwara, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site RC.REV. 438/2018 Page 1 of 3 plan annexed with ...
Raghuvir Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs.ircon Internatiobnal Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~A-29 and 30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 10.2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 336/2019 RAGHUVIR BUILDCON PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate and with Mr. Purvish Malkan Ms.Dharita Malkan, Advocates. IRCON INTERNATION LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Mr. Prakhar Deep and Mr. Nishant Doshi, Advocates. + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 337/2019 RAGHUVIR BUILDCON PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Purvish Malkan and Ms. Dharita Malkan, Advocates. IRCON INTERNATIOBNAL LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Mr. Prakhar Deep and Mr. Nishant Doshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13981/2019 (for exemption) in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 336/2019 I.A. No.13994/2019 (for exemption) in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 337/2019 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. O.M.P.(I.)(COMM...
Commissioner of Customs (Import) vs.m/s Trinetra Impex Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of decision:11.10.2019 CUSAA1952019, CM APPL. 30592/2019 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Adv. Versus M/S TRINETRA IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Chawla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1. The present appeal under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 is directed against the final order No.55775-55776/2017 dated 10.08.2017 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.C/53509/2015 whereby the appeal of M/s Trinetra Impex Pvt. Ltd./Respondent has been allowed and the penalties imposed under Section 112 (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter as Act) on the Director of the Respondent have been set-aside.2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s Trinetra Impex Pvt Ltd. is a holder of Customs House Agent (hereinafter as C...
Manoj Kumar Pruthi vs.m/s Magma Housing Finance
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
Through: Mr Sanjay S. Chhabra, Advocate. W.P.(C) 2067/2019 & C.M. APPL. 9676/2019 (stay) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~8 * + MANOJ KUMAR PRUTHI ........ Petitioner M/S MAGMA HOUSING FINANCE ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Through: Mr Samarendra Kumar, Advocate. versus % ORDER1110.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is heard finally.2. The present petition is directed against an order dated 15th January, 2019, passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), rejecting the... Petitioners application being I.A. No.450/2018, seeking waiver of the pre- deposit in terms of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).3. The background facts are that the Respondent demanded from the present... Petitioner a sum of Rs. 84, 17, 558/- by way of a demand notice issued W.P.(C) 2067/2019 Page 1 of 8 under Section ...
Krishna Reddy & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~27 * + CRL.M.C. 4680/2019 KRISHNA REDDY & ANR STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Date of decision:11. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. versus Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS SI Manmohan Yadav, PS, Dwarka South, New Delhi Adv. for R-2 (Appearance not given) Complainant No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1. 0014/2018 dated 12.01.2018 registered at Police Station Dwarka South and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 10.07.2017 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the CRL.M.C. 4680/2019 Pag...
Ubv Infrastructures Limited vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:02. 09.2019 11.10.2019 % + O.M.P. (COMM) 298/2017 UBV INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Siddharth Naidu, Mr. Vipin Prabhat and Mr. Aditya Shukla, Advocates. Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Ms.Arvshi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT JYOTI SINGH, J I.A. No.12005/2019 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 82 days in filing the written submissions on behalf of the petitioner. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the written submissions is condoned. Written Submissions are taken on record. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 298/2017 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation O.M.P. (COMM.) 298/2017 Page 1 of 27 Act, 1996 (Act) seeking to set ...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »