Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pawan Kumar vs.rekha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.No.4347/2019 & Crl. M.A. 34796/2019 Judgment reserved on :02. 09.2019 Date of decision :11. 10.2019 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner REKHA Through: Mr. A.K. Pandey, Advocate versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition assails the impugned order dated 02.08.2019 of the learned ASJ-02, South-West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.15/2019 whereby the learned Appellate Court though set aside the order dated 07.12.2018 of the learned MM (Mahila Court), South West in CC No.11772/2016 whereby the learned trial Court had granted interim maintenance of Rs.15,000/- p.m. in favour of the respondent, the wife of the present petitioner directed that the amount of maintenance to be given by the appellant was fixed at Rs.10,880/- per month to be paid by the appellant i.e. the present petitioner to the respondent on or before the 10th day of...
Mukhtiar Singh vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~19 * + W.P.(C)10811/2019 MUKHTIAR SINGH UNION OF INDIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anoop P. Awasthi, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Mr.Manish Srivastava, Ms. Mehak Khurana & Mr. Rijul Taneja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.44714-44715/2019 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C)10811/2019 & CM APPL. No.44716/2019 The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 04.07.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) by which the O.A. filed by the petitioner was dismissed primarily on the ground of it being barred by limitation.2. In this case, the petitioner was appointed to the post of Assistant Comptroller of Accounts on 01.01.2006 ; and it is claimed that he was eligible to be considered for promotion to the post of De...
Abhishek Kumar vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:06. 09.2019 Order pronounced on:11. 10.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 1913/2019 Abhishek Kumar ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra and Himanshu Sharma, Advocates versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr G.M.Farooqui, CORAM: APP for State alongwith W/SI Rekha Chauhan, P.S. N.A. Nagar. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI ORDER Vide this order, I shall dispose of anticipatory bail application % 1. filed on behalf of the petitioner Abhishek Kumar under section 438 Cr.P.C. r/w. section 482 CrPC.2. Brief facts for disposal of the application are that an FIR No.3dt. 21.05.19 u/s. 376/328/313/506 IPC was registered on the statement of complainant in which she alleged that she had come in contact with the applicant through mobile app happen and friendly relations had developed between them. She further alleged that Bail Appl. No.1913/2019 Page no.1 accused had proposed to marry her in Nov. 2017 and she had accepted the...
Parveen Kataria vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~23 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1608/2019 PARVEEN KATARIA Date of decision:11. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sushil Kumar, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State Mr. S. K. Gautam, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Jamia Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.3dated 03.06.2014, registered at PS Jamia Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled CRL.M.C. 1608/2019 Page 1 of 2 their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.6. Respo...
Jitender Singh vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~ 5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO4742018 Decided on:-"11th October, 2019 JITENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanchit Vashistha with Mr.Kartikay Sharma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then aged about 22 years, resident of Village Khurampur, Tehsil, Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana had concededly suffered injuries and was found in such state on the railway tracks just ahead of Rewari railway station sometime around 9.27 a.m. on 24.10.2016, and though taken to the hospital and given medical aid and assistance, suffered consequent amputation of both lower limbs. He instituted claim for compensation [(No.OA (IIu) 65/2017]. on 20.02.2017 before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi, inter alia, stating that while travelling in a railway train from his native village in Bawal to Delhi, he had suffered slip at the time of re-bo...
Vikram & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5109/2019 VIKRAM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Anand, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Tarang Shrivastava, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Ved Pal Sharma (Retd.) with Inspector Jas Pal, PS Mangol Puri Mr. Dileep Kumar Kushwaha, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37768/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5109/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.2160/2014, dated 18.11.2014 registered at Police Station Mangolpuri, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5109/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent n...
Krishan Kumar Saini (Since Deceased and Now Represented by His Lrs) vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. h October, 2019 + CM (M) 682/2015 KRISHAN KUMAR SAINI (SINCE DECEASED AND NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS) ........ Petitioner Through: Md. Z. Rahaman, Advocate with Mr. Bhupinder Singh Saini, Advocate (M- 9831094619) Mr. Vinay Kumar Saini, P-1 present in person (M-9818715408)... Petitioner No.3 present in person (M- 8447085738) versus RAJINDER KUMAR SAINI (SINCE DECEASED AND NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Angad Singh, Advocates (M-9811673338) Mr. Kuldeep Saini, LR of R-2 (M- 9868940168) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM(M) 682/2015 & CM APPLs. 13103/2015, 4768/2017, 54010/2018 1. The present petition arises out of a suit for partition between the legal heirs of Late. Shri Som Nath Saini. The suit was filed by Shri Krishan Kumar Saini (Plaintiff) against his two brothers, namely, Sh. Rajinder Kumar Saini and Sh. Surinder Kumar Saini (Defenda...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr. Vs.amit Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 10.2019 $~17 * + W.P.(C) 10783/2019 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD (Services) with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh & Ms. Laveena Arora, Advocates. versus AMIT YADAV Through : Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal & ..... Respondent Ms.Aditi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.44528/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CAVEAT PET. No.1009/2019 Since learned counsel for the respondent has entered appearance and has been heard, the caveat stands discharged. The caveat petition stands disposed of accordingly. W.P.(C) 10783/2019 Page 1 of 10 W.P.(C) 10783/2019 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set-down for hearing at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 06.12.2018 pa...
M/S Diwan Chand Basant Lal & Anr. Vs.yogeshwar Nath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 280/2019 Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2019 M/S DIWAN CHAND BASANT LAL & ANR ........ Petitioners versus YOGESHWAR NATH ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Behl, Advocate with petitioner No.2 in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Sunil Dutt Dixit, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 03.01.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from the tenanted premises being part of property bearing No.100, Bangla Sahib Marg, New Delhi comprising of a shop with verandah facing Bangla Sahib RC.REV.280/2019 Page 1 of 3 Marg, New Delhi toge...
Raghuvir Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs.ircon Internation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~A-29 and 30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 10.2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 336/2019 RAGHUVIR BUILDCON PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate and with Mr. Purvish Malkan Ms.Dharita Malkan, Advocates. IRCON INTERNATION LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Mr. Prakhar Deep and Mr. Nishant Doshi, Advocates. + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 337/2019 RAGHUVIR BUILDCON PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Purvish Malkan and Ms. Dharita Malkan, Advocates. IRCON INTERNATIOBNAL LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Mr. Prakhar Deep and Mr. Nishant Doshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.13981/2019 (for exemption) in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 336/2019 I.A. No.13994/2019 (for exemption) in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 337/2019 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. O.M.P.(I.)(COMM...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »