Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
g.hema Gowri vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2953/2012 G.HEMA GOWRI Date of Decision:14. h October, 2019 ........ Petitioner Sr.Adv. with Through: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Mr.Anshuman Sahni, Ms.Diva Mehta, Mr.Apurv Chandola, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms.Kamaldeep, Mr.P.Upendra Sai, Advs. for R-1&2. Mr.Satyakam, ASC with Mr.Akhil Dehlan, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) This public interest litigation has been preferred for the following :1. prayers:-"A. Mandamus, thereby directing the... RESPONDENTS to frame a comprehensive policy for providing education for child with special needs and more particularly for the child with intellectually impaired and autism spectrum disorder cerebral palsy etc. B. Mandamus, thereby directing the... RESPONDENTS to frame the comprehensive specialized curriculum planning, implementation and evalu...
Sh. Naveen Kumar vs.m/s Sir Ganga Ram City Hospital and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"14.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 8859/2018 SH. NAVEEN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Adv. versus M/S SIR GANGA RAM CITY HOSPITAL AND ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Harvinder Singh with Mr.Shiven Khurana & Ms.Nidhi Sanotra, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Pankaj Yadav & Mr.Priyaranjan Dubey, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the workman assails the ex- parte award dated 10.04.2018 passed by the learned Labour Court- XVII, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in LIR No.740/18. Under the impugned award the learned Labour Court had, after coming to the conclusion that the petitioners services had been terminated eight months before the scheduled date, directed the respondent no.1 to pay a lump sum compensation of Rs.35,000/- to the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is WP (C) No.8859/2018 Page 1 of 3 aggrieved by t...
Ratnamani Metals and Tubes Limited vs.indain Oil Corporation Limited ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~A-26 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 405/2019 RATNAMANI METALS AND TUBES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Raj Karma & Mr. Vishal Nautiyal, Advocates versus INDAIN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED (IOCL) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 14165/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 405/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocate, enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.3. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for passing the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 405/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. Disputes arose between the parties relating to the Agreement dated 16.04.2015. Sole Arbitrator entered upon reference on 14.03.2018 and commenced the Arbitrati...
Satish Kumar vs.khushboo Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h October, 2019 CS(COMM) 89/2019, IAs No.2499/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 9149/2019 (u/OVII R-11 CPC) SATISH KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. Versus KHUSHBOO SINGH & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. with Mr. P.S. Rana & Ms. Disha Passi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff Satish Kumar has instituted this suit against (a) Khushboo Singh; (b) Abhishek Chauhan; and (c) Aarya Fashion through its proprietor Khushboo Singh, for (i) permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants, thereby restraining the defendants and their agents, servants, relatives, associates, attorney, etc. from logging in, accessing and using the official email ids of the plaintiff including [email protected] [email protected] and further disseminating, reproducing, uploading, publishing, circulating, broadcasting, distributing...
Sh. n.k. Madhok vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~56 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :14. h October, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Rajeshwari H., Advocate SH. N.K. MADHOK + W.P.(C) 10903/2019 CORAM: versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.45093/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10903/2019 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 06.12.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal), by which the prayer made by the petitioner for grant of interest from 02.10.2004 to 31.03.2015 has been declined; and pension for the period he had rendered service with National Airports Authority (NAA) with effect from 02.08.1989 to 30.11.2003 has also been denied.4. The petitioner herein joined service on 02.04.1976 after qualifying in the UPSC exam held in the year 1975 and ...
Kamal Kishore @ Lalaji vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:13. 09.2019 % Order delivered on:11. 10.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 1006/2019 Kamal Kishore @ Lalaji ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. N. Dudeja, Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj and Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. versus THE STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State with SI Ravi Kumar, from P.S. Karawal Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI ORDER This is a bail application moved on behalf of petitioner Kamal % 1. Kishore @ Lalaji filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in FIR No.162/2012, u/s. 302/2IPC PS Karawal Nagar.2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that applicant/ accused is an old man aged 75 years who is in Judicial custody since 19.05.12 i.e. for a period of more than six years and is a disabled person suffering from several serious medical ailments like Asthama and 40% of his left body is paralyzed due to post burn contractions. He further submits that Trial Cour...
Asa Singh & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~37 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5114/2019 Date of decision:11.10.2019 ASA SINGH & ORS Through: versus Mr. Harjeet Narang, Mr. Anuj Baawra, Advs. with Petition Nos. 1-3 ........ Petitioners STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Vinod Kumar, PS Tilak Nagar Mr. Vipin, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37780/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5114/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.439/2017 dated 03.09.2017 registered at Police Station- Tilak Nagar, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the CRL.M.C.5114/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petiti...
Harbhagwan Sachdeva & Ors vs.marwari Charitable Turst (Regd) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. h October, 2019 + CM (M) 1467/2019 HARBHAGWAN SACHDEVA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Dewan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anupam Dhingra and Mr. Bharat Sachdeva, Advocates. (M:98114. 2603) versus MARWARI CHARITABLE TURST (REGD) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 44622/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM (M) 1467/2019 & CM APPL. 44621/2019 (stay) 2. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 3rd July, 2019 by which the application under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC was decided by the ld. Trial Court.3. The application sought the following relief: It is therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to frame the proposed issue stated in para No.6 above and the parties may be allowed to lead the evidence in support thereof in accordance with law, in the interest o...
M/S National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Pcl Suncon (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 276/2019 and CM APPL. 44016-44019/2019 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Padma Priya and Mr. Dhruv Nayar, Advocates ..... Appellant 1. versus M/S PCL SUNCON (JV) ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Rishabh Dheer, Mr. Amol Acharya and Mr. Rayadurgam Bharat, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The present appeal has arisen from a judgment dated 17.07.2019, ORDER1110.2019 dismissing OMP No.1232/2012 filed by the appellant/NHAI under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the A&C Act) and upholding the Arbitral Award dated 23.08.2012, passed by the Majority of the Arbitral Tribunal.2. Brief relevant facts of the case are that the appellant/NHAI had awarded the work for Four laning and Strengthening of Existing two lane Highways Section from Km 317+000 to Km 65+000 on NH-2 (Package IV- A) in the State of U.P...
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways vs.l&t Transportation Infrastr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 289/2015 Reserved on:07. 08.2019 Date of Decision:11. 10.2019 MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Mr.Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr.Ramneek Mishra, Mr.Abhishek Rana and Mr.Sidhant Kumar, Advs. versus L&T TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dayan Krishanan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Arpan Behl, Adv. for R-1. Mr.D.Balaraman and Mr.Anand Sathiyaseelan, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 12.12.2014 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Tripartite Concession Agreement dated 03.10.1997, executed between Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (L&T Ltd.) with the petitioner and the respondent no.2....
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »