Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Solanki vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5212/2019 ASHOK SOLANKI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Rakesh Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. ASI Devender Singh PS Aman Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 38049/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5212/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.333/2019 dated 17.07.2019 registered at Police Station Aman Vihar instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.5212/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6...
Maple Logistics Private Limited &Anr vs.principal Chief Commissioner o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 7003/2019 MAPLE LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED &ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep, Mr. Devang and Mr. Ashutosh, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Mr. Tushar Gupta, Ms. EashaKadian and Mr. Sidharth Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral):1.... Petitioner, by way of the present petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to refund the income tax amount on account of excess deduction of tax at source in respect of Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19, and other consequential directions to adjust the outstanding amount of TDS and GST payable by... Petitioner Company against the pending refund amount without charging of any...
Iqbal Ahmed & Ors. Vs.nigar Mustafa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 343/2018 Judgment delivered on:14. 10.2019 IQBAL AHMED & ORS versus NIGAR MUSTAFA ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Zubeda Begum, Ms. Sana Ansari with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.07.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent filed the subject petition seeking eviction of the petitioner under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one room, kitchen, bath and toilet on the first floor, one room on the second floor and one tinshed room on the third floor of half of property No.1577 over and above the part of the property No.1578, Gali Meer Karor Wali, Near Bank of India, Gali Qasim...
Maanvender Singh Malik vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5144/2019 MAANVENDER SINGH MALIK ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Murari Kumar, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ASI Harish Chand PS Burari. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 37892/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5144/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.295/2017 dated 22.06.2017, registered at PS Burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.5144/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled t...
Naveen Kotiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 14, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 360/2019 NAVEEN KOTIYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Rana & Mr. Gaurav Saini, Advocates Versus ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI Through: Mr. G.M.Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with WSI Sarita JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) 1. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent/State submits that charge-sheet in this case has been filed before the court concerned and the case is now listed on 17th October, 2019 before the trial court.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is pending before the court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate and is yet to be committed to the court of Sessions and the Metropolitan Magistrate is not empowered to consider petitioners bail application. Bail Appln.360/2019 Page 1 of 2 3. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with the direction that till the case hearing FIR No.39/2019...
Bhumika Choudhary vs.all India Institiute of Medical Sciences
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 10.10.2019 Judgement pronounced on 14.10.2019 + W.P.(C) 9480/2019 & CM No.39036/2019 BHUMIKA CHOUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sanjana Saddy with Mr. Sanyat Lodha,, and Mr. Anish Chawla, Advs. versus ALL INDIA INSTITIUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dushyant Parashar, Adv. for AIIMS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that she was denied a seat by the respondent i.e. All India Institute of Medical Science (hereafter referred to as AIIMS) even though she was eligible for being considered for allotment of a seat in the MBBS Program in the OBC (non-creamy layer) category (hereafter referred to as OBC category).2. The respondent i.e. All India Institute of Medical Sciences (hereafter referred to as AIIMS) has defended its action by taking recourse to the fact that the certificate evidencing that the petitioner fell in the OBC ...
Irb Ahmedabad Vadodara Super Express Tollway Private Limited vs.nation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~A~14 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h October, 2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 247/2019 IRB AHMEDABAD VADODARA SUPER EXPRESS TOLLWAY PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Mrs. Teressa Daulat and mr. Mohnish P., Advocates. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Ms. Padma Priya, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.14155/2019 1. This is application seeking condonation of delay of 28 days in filing the rejoinder.2. Ms. Priya, learned counsel for the respondent, has no objection to the condonation of delay.3. In view of the no objection and the reason stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 28 days in filing the rejoinder is condoned. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 247/2019 Page 1 of 6 4. Application is disposed of. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 247/2019 5. The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...
Quippo Consturction Equipment Ltd vs.janardan Nirman Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~51 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :14. h October, 2019 FAO(OS) 245/2017 QUIPPO CONSTURCTION EQUIPMENT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr.Akshat Hansaria, Mr.Tushar Bhatnagar, Ms.Etisha Srivastav and Mr.Yash Kumar, Advts. versus CORAM: JANARDAN NIRMAN PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Surya Prakash, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 32384/2017 (delay) 1. This is an application filed by the appellant/applicant seeking condonation of delay of 100 days in filing the present appeal.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently opposed the prayer made in the application and submits that should the application be allowed, the appellant must be burdened with costs.3. Accordingly, the prayer made in the application is allowed and delay of 100 days in filing the appeal is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.15,000/- to be deposited with the Delhi High Court Middle Incom...
Krishan Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~7 to 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :14. h October, 2019 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent % + + + + + + + + + W.P.(C) 2184/2019 KRISHAN KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus W.P.(C) 2185/2019 SHRI SHIV OM & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. W.P.(C) 2129/2019 RAKESH KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS W.P.(C) 2257/2019 DEEPAK & ORS UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus versus W.P.(C) 2258/2019 SH. MAHENDRA KUMAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. W.P.(C) 2259/2019 VIJAY SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS W.P.(C) 2260/2019 SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. W.P.(C) 2261/2019 SH. SAMANDER SINGH AND ORS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. W.P.(C) 2262/2019...
Dharamveer Yadav @ Dharambir Yadav vs.nirmal Gupta @ Nirmala Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-14-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 10.2019 RC.REV. 14/2017 & CM APPL. 1593/2017 DHARAMVEER YADAV @ DHARAMBIR YADAV........ Petitioner versus NIRMAL GUPTA @ NIRMALA GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms. Kajal Chandra, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. S.K.Jain, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.11.2016 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction of the petitioner from one room in property No.53/12, Gali No.5, Arya Nagar, Harijan Basti, Delhi more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed to the eviction petition. Subject eviction petition was filed by the resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »