Delhi Court October 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chatter Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2895/2019 CHATTER SINGH Date of decision:16. 10.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate $~28 * % STATE Versus Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rambhai ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1. Parole of six weeks is sought by petitioner vide this petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that mother of petitioner has expired on 1st October, 2019 and her satarvi is scheduled on 20th October, 2019 and maha havan is to take place on 15th November, 2019.3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that factum of death of petitioners mother stands verified.4. 5. Heard. In the interest of justice, the petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of six weeks from the date of his release on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the sati...
Intellectual Property Attorneys Association vs.the Controller General ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~6 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3851/2019 & CM Appls. 17546/2019, 29362/2019 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION Through: Mr.C.M. Lall, Senior Advocate with and Mr.Rahul ........ Petitioner Ms.Nancy Roy Vidhani, Advocates Mr.Amarjit Singh with Ms.Shubhi Sharma, Advocates for Interveners. versus 1. THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS, DESIGNS & TRADE MARKS & ANR Through: Mr.Ravi ........ RESPONDENTS Prakash, CGSC with Mr.Farman Ali, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-speaking orders passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks while refusing applications for registration of Trade Marks in violation of Section 18(5) of the Trade Marks Act.2. Section 18(5) of the Trade Marks Act mandates the Registrar to record in writing the grounds for refusal or conditional acceptance of the application for registration of Trade Marks. Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act is re...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.wakil Kumar @ Wakil Dass & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~12 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. 10.2019 + MAC.APP. 1166/2018 & CM APPL. 54554/2018 ORIENTAL INSURNACE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate. versus WAKIL KUMAR @ WAKIL DASS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 26.10.2018 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.529/2010, on the ground that the compensation apropos loss of future prospects has been awarded towards injuries suffered by the injured/victim in a motor-vehicular accident.2. The Court would note that such compensation can be granted to the injured/victim as has been held in the dicta of Supreme Court in Jagdish vs. Mohan & Ors., (2018) 4 SCC571 Furthermore, on 01.07.2019, the Supreme Court has reiterated the same principle in Parminder Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors 2019 SCC OnLine SC802 MAC.APP. 1166/2018 Page...
M/S Ambuj Hotel & Real Estate (P) Ltd vs.indian Railway Catering & Tou ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 10.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 285/2019 M/S AMBUJ HOTEL & REAL ESTATE (P) LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Mr. Sulalit Singh Sisodia, Mr. Archit Kumar & Mr.Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advs. Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Adv. for applicant. versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORP LTD ..Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.43506-43507/2019 (exemptions) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 285/2019 page 1 of 5 CM APPL. No.43508/2019 (condonation of delay) This is an application seeking condonation of 302 days delay in filing the present appeal. Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the delay in filing of the appeal is on account of cogent reasons and unforeseen circumstances a...
Nagender Kumar & Anr. Vs.anita Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 10.2019 C.R.P. 164/2018 & CM APPL. 31832/2018 NAGENDER KUMAR & ANR versus ANITA TIWARI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Mr.Divakar Kumar, Adv. Mr.Mansoor Ansari, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioners impugn order dated 10.05.2018 whereby the application of the petitioners under Order 18 Rule 17 for recall of the Witness and permission to lead further evidence to prove certain documents has been dismissed.2. Subject suit was filed by the respondent for recovery of possession, arrears of license fee and mesne profits contending that respondent is the owner of the subject property. It is contended that the subject property was licensed to the petitioners on a monthly license fee of 4000/- which was subsequently enhanced to 4500/- for the purposes of having a regula...
Sh. Virender Kumar Mutreja vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19. 09.2019 % Pronounced on :16. 10.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 814/2019 & CRL. M.A. 32954/2019 SH. VIRENDER KUMAR MUTREJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Buttan, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed this revision petition U/s 397 R/w Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 01.07.2019 by virtue of which the Ld. MM was pleased to pass the order for framing of the charge against the revisionist and others U/s 3A, 4, 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 6 r/w PC & PNDT Act and 120B (Part-I) IPC. CRL. REV. P. 814/2019 Page 1 of 11 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 18.6.16 a secret information was received by Civil Surgeon Gurgaon regarding the fact that a laboratory, owned by Ashok Gulia, proprietor of M/s Gulia Path Labs, situated at Wazirpur More, Gurgaon is running a sex determination r...
Fitwell Power Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs.voith Hydro Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~A~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 10.2019 + ARB.P. 603/2019 FITWELL POWER PROJECT PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A. Karthik, Mr. Badusha S., Ms. Smrithi Suresh and Mr. Ankit Jaglan, Advocates. versus VOITH HYDRO PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ayush Aggrawal, Mr. Vikrant B. and Mr. M. Kirshna, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator.2. Disputes and differences arose between the parties with respect to an agreement dated 17th May 2019.3. The agreement between the parties is governed by an Arbitration Clause, which reads as under:-"10.33 ARBITRATION1033.1 Any dispute or difference which may arise between the parties out of or in connection with this Contract which the parties are unable to settle amicably, shall be settled Arb. P. No.603/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. to arbitration as...
Som Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs.nbcc India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10916/2019 Date of Judgment :16. h October, 2019 SOM PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anish Dayal, Mrs. Preety Makkar, Ms. Rupam Vaid Sharma and Ms. Ayushi Makkar, Advocates NBCC INDIA LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Shilpi Choudhary, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL451302019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10916/2019 3. Since we have heard the learned counsels for the parties at the admission stage itself, with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Brief facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the respondent invited a tender on 19.07.2019 for Construction of Residential Buildings including the Podium for Department of CGST and C...
Ritika vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLICATION. No.887/2019 Judgment Reserved on:13. 09.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:16. 10.2019 RITIKA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rashid Azam, Advocate. versus Through Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI State with IO. Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Adv. for complainant with complainant in person. JUDGMENT1 Vide this order, I shall dispose of an application filed by the petitioner Ritika under section 438 read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.registered at PS Inderpuri.2. The case of the prosecution is that X (actual name withheld) the only daughter of the complainant (who was born on 20.12.2005) was studying in class-VII at Gyan Mandir Public School, E-Block, Nariana Vihar, New Delhi-110028. The complainant is an Advocate BAIL APPLICATION. No.887/2019 Page 1 of 23 by profession and is practicing at Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. The daughter of the c...
Deepak Verma vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. 10.2019 % Pronounced on :16. 10.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2418/2019 DEEPAK VERMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C.M. Verma, Ms. Upasana Chandra Shekaran and Ms. Pragati Banka, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Pravesh Kumar. Mr. Rakesh C. Agarwal, Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Dhanuka, Ms. Manju Aggarwal and Mr. Amarnath, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER Crl. M.A. No.36760/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2418/2019 Page 1 of 5 BAIL APPLN. 2418/2019 1. This is an application filed under Section 438 read with section 482 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.185/2019 U/s 408 IPC registered at Police Station- Vivek Vihar, Delhi.2. In brief the facts are that the petitioner was employee of the complainant and used to loo...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »